• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Apple iPad revealed

Status
Not open for further replies.
SnakeXs said:
Yes, there are some and there will be exclusive apps later.

What I'm wondering is if an app has versions for both if you can buy 1 app and get them both or if you'll have to decide to go with the "better" iPad version, or getting support for both devices but dealing with an upscaled version for the iPad.
Universal apps will work according to the device they're on. There's no deciding anything.
 
Gary Whitta said:
Ha, I'm the opposite, forcing me into single-tasking where I'm not procrastinating by switching over to surf the web every five minutes is actually a bonus for me! :lol

You know now that I think about it, this would be a cool device for a creative writing. Wake up in the middle of the night with an idea, no need to boot up your laptop, just insta-on and jot your idea down.

If you don't like distractions, there is a cool program for OSX that creates a blank screen called Write Room. There is a free version of this for PC called dark room.

http://www.hogbaysoftware.com/products/writeroom
 
People talking about the initial reaction to the iPhone seem to have forgotten that a lot of those complaints were significant, and fixed pretty quickly. $600, and no Exchange email, and slow.

As far as popularity, everybody needs/has a phone. Not everybody needs/has a tablet.
 
RobotChant said:
People have the audacity to say this current device may not get everything right but it's a good start, yet they shit on netbooks. They look forward to future versions of the ipad, but netbooks are also in its infancy. There's still a lot of room to grow and get it right with better hardware and software.

As for the UI, how easy it is to use for non computer literate folks is overblown. Ipods are inelegant with it's need for Itunes, installing and syncing, charging, yet people figured it out. People were so successful at figuring it out they made Ipod one of the most successful devices ever. These same people are not going to have trouble using a full OS on a tablet doing the equivalent Ipad stuff like movie, music, pictures and browsing.

I see the physical keyboard and kickstand case as just confirmation of how flawed the designs are for devices like these.
Good points. I didn't really think about that. People who find the ipad easy to use, but not a regula computer still need a way to sync. I wonder how stand alone this product will be? For example, can you print from it? Can you transfer files without a base computer? It may be easy to use but you still really need a computer to go with it.

And yes, I always saw the stand ad a necessary thing to be made available. That just goes with the form factor of only having a screen.
 
Hari Seldon said:
You know now that I think about it, this would be a cool device for a creative writing. Wake up in the middle of the night with an idea, no need to boot up your laptop, just insta-on and jot your idea down.

If you don't like distractions, there is a cool program for OSX that creates a blank screen called Write Room. There is a free version of this for PC called dark room.

http://www.hogbaysoftware.com/products/writeroom
Yeah I use WriteRoom a lot because I'm too easily distracted and blanking out all other apps and windows is sometimes what it takes to get me to focus.
 
MThanded said:
:lol :lol

Yet, some get completely offended at the idea that the iPad is a giant iPod Touch. I still say it's lazy industrial and UI design to just upsize everything the way it's been done. It may fit a niche for the terminally computer illiterate, but I have little use for such a thing that I can't do any development work on at home.
 
sprsk said:
By the way, we are NOT these people.
I think I am. Pretty much all I do on my computer is browse the web.

Hell, quite a lot of the time I'm happy just to lay on my sofa browsing the web on my iPhone. I think I could get by quite well with an iPad, whether I choose to or not, however, is another matter.

I think the iPad is closer to the netbook market than Apple would let on, but I could absolutely see netbook people buying an iPad.
 
Burger said:
Last I saw it was still 2 UMPC's taped to a ring binder.
Exactly hat I was thinking. It's still just a concept. The thing with the ipad is thaT it's a real product. Somethig apple seldom do is announce anything before it's something you can hold. What if the courier is still a year away? The ipad coul be something very different in a years time.
 
Hari Seldon said:
The problem with word processing on the ipad is that you cannot multitask. I dunno about you, but when I write documents I like to have a web browser open for pulling up info, maybe a pdf or two open to get info from, etc. I don't think the iPad will be very good for word processing, but that is just my opinion.
Yup.

Hopefully iPhone OS 4.0 solves this issue, but still... it's square! I'll wait for the 16:9 version with a front facing camera.
 
teiresias said:
Yet, some get completely offended at the idea that the iPad is a giant iPod Touch. I still say it's lazy industrial and UI design to just upsize everything the way it's been done. It may fit a niche for the terminally computer illiterate, but I have little use for such a thing that I can't do any development work on at home.
WTF man I really like the courier design but i would like to see it actually created sooner rather than later. No need to get offended.

Also trust me I am not terminally computer illiterate. If name calling makes you feel better about yourself then go ahead.

Also, I run windows 7 on my desktop at home and my desktop in my office at school... I'm assuming you think I am a Microsoft hater. Far from it.
 
teiresias said:
Yet, some get completely offended at the idea that the iPad is a giant iPod Touch. I still say it's lazy industrial and UI design to just upsize everything the way it's been done. It may fit a niche for the terminally computer illiterate, but I have little use for such a thing that I can't do any development work on at home.
The computer illiterate is not a niche, that's the mainstream. You are the niche.
 
Hari Seldon said:
You know now that I think about it, this would be a cool device for a creative writing. Wake up in the middle of the night with an idea, no need to boot up your laptop, just insta-on and jot your idea down.

a $500 computer you can use when you wake up in the night and need to write something down?

The best part is now watching everyone try and think of a scenario that justifies this device.
 
Hrm, while I had heard and believed the rumours that it'd be a giant iPhone, i didn't think it would be just that and nothing more though

fake edit: was the thread title made before the specs and info came out, because I can't see any practical use for this for anyone who has a smart phone? (i have an iphone)
 
jts said:
Universal apps will work according to the device they're on. There's no deciding anything.

Yeah I mean if an app has a regular iPhone/universal version AND an enhanced, just for iPad version.
 
Gary Whitta said:
The computer illiterate is not a niche, that's the mainstream. You are the niche.

Seriously the people in these threads would be amazed if they knew how computer illiterate the average person is.

I can't tell you how many times when a teacher hooks their computer up to a projector in class or when I'm walking around office cubicles that I see an endless supply of unorganized folders and documents.

And no this isn't a "gender" or "age" thing.
 
Kodiak said:
less and less so as all the old people die.
I'm sure Apple will address that with a new product in 15-20 years when that actually happens. For right now, they're going to make a lot of money with a product that almost all people find delightfully easy to use, just as they have been doing since the launch of the first iPod.
 
TheEastonator said:
Eh, I am underwhelmed by the announcement. It certainly looks cool and slick, but I just can't come up with any reason to purchase this over a similarly priced (or even cheaper) netbook. The main sticking points for me is the lack of multi-tasking and flash player (I know, there are reasons behind it, but still - it means a lot of pages I frequent and would want to casually surf to wouldn't work). I just can't figure out who this product is aimed at...people who love their iPhone but want to surf the internet on it more often with a bigger screen?

The battery life is roughly equivilant to a netbook, the price is higher, and it's more limited...what's the point? Not trolling, just genuinely curious what the appeal they're going for here. One of my teachers today made a good point: "Apple is always good at showing me why I need their latest product...but I didn't get any of that from the iPad."

I couldn't agree more. I was just dying to be all excited about the Apple tablet but the iPad is such a letdown. I don't need a second bigger iPod Touch. My iPhone does just fine. It is way too limited to replace a full laptop with its lack of multitasking and limited iPhone OS. For that same price of $500 you can get a decent netbook or laptop with waaayyyy more functionality. The pretty Apple interface just isnt worth the premium to me.

I am really surprised that they launched this so called "revolutionary" product with no revolutionary features. It is for all intents and purposes an iPod Touch with a larger screen. Where is the new interface that makes tasks like web browsing or email more intuitive? Where are the groundbreaking features I can't find in any other product or form factor? There really isn't any. They REALLY should have expanded the OS MUUUUCCHHHH more.
 
D4Danger said:
a $500 computer you can use when you wake up in the night and need to write something down?

The best part is now watching everyone try and think of a scenario that justifies this device.

Isn't that what we do with every device?

The scenarios will ring true for some people, other people won't be able to come up with a compelling reason.
 
tabsina said:
Hrm, while I had heard and believed the rumours that it'd be a giant iPhone, i didn't think it would be just that and nothing more though

fake edit: was the thread title made before the specs and info came out, because I can't see any practical use for this for anyone who has a smart phone? (i have an iphone)
Guess i don't exist.
 
Kodiak said:
less and less so as all the old people die.

That's not at all true. People learn to deal with computers to get to the things they DO do. People rarely know much more beyond that. People who do are geeks, and they're the people that the illiterate people call when they have a problem, like aforementioned deleting of the internet.
 
I'll probably be interested in the year 2 or year 3 version. Give it higher resolution, some level of multitasking, and an eye-popping screen, and it'd probably make a great portable image viewer (photo sharing, comic reader, etc.), and occasional movie viewer and "couch" web browser. But this model seems very first gen, not nearly attractive enough to buy yet.
 
Kodiak said:
less and less so as all the old people die.
It's not even an old people problem.

Younger people know how to type fast (usually) and can get around the Internet, but their computers are still a fucking mess, and they don't know anything once you tell them to open the file explorer or Control Panel. Going into either of those completely trips them out.

When all of us can honestly say that we have never had a friend or relative bug us about fixing or helping with anything computer-related at all, we can say that computer illiterates are not the majority of people.
 
Flying_Phoenix said:
Seriously the people in these threads would be amazed if they knew how computer illiterate the average person is.

I can't tell you how many times when a teacher hooks their computer up to a projector in class or when I'm walking around office cubicles that I see an endless supply of unorganized folders and documents.

And no this isn't a "gender" or "age" thing.

I think people confuse illiteracy with laziness a lot. A genuinely illiterate person wouldn't be able to use a computer in a way that would produce a desktop covered in files.

And I don't think most Apple products actually cater to -- or for that matter market to -- computer illiterates. The vast majority of iphone and mac owners I know are anything but illiterate on any scale. The only notable exception imo is the classic ipods.
 
I see a lot of people referring to it as a Tablet here and there. I'd say, post briefing, that there isn't really anything Tablet left to the device. Its very much its own thing from the iPhone/iTouch side of things, and you wouldn't call them "tablets" (or "pills", haw haw haw).

I'm surprised actually that so little time or depth was given to the "digital magazine" side of things more, which still feels like the big "exclusive" thing this device would be driving, instead having a disproportional focus on iWorks trying to convince students and the like that this could feasibly replace their laptop (it wont)
 
Gary Whitta said:
I'm sure Apple will address that with a new product in 15-20 years when that actually happens. For right now, they're going to make a lot of money with a product that almost all people find delightfully easy to use, just as they have been doing since the launch of the first iPod.


I really don't think there is room for a third pillar just because apple says there is. Even with the mainstream. This product will is MB Air 2.0
 
EviLore said:
I'll probably be interested in the year 2 or year 3 version. Give it higher resolution, multitasking, and an eye-popping screen, and it'd probably make a great portable image viewer (photo sharing, comic reader, etc.), and occasional movie viewer and "couch" web browser. But this model seems very first gen, not nearly attractive enough to buy yet.

I said before, LED backlit IPS is about as good as can be before going OLED. Given year 2 or 3 I could see 10 inch OLEDs being feasible but the screen's bound to be a stunner.
 
SnakeXs said:
Yeah I mean if an app has a regular iPhone/universal version AND an enhanced, just for iPad version.
I know that iPhone apps work on all devices, but universal apps are not just regular iPhone apps, they are apps targeted and optimized for both devices ;)

No choosing. Single binary.
 
I'm not sure why people are high fiving a zing against the MS Courier when Apple didn't even come close to showing something to be celebrating over.
 
SecretBonusPoint said:
I see a lot of people referring to it as a Tablet here and there. I'd say, post briefing, that there isn't really anything Tablet left to the device. Its very much its own thing from the iPhone/iTouch side of things, and you wouldn't call them "tablets" (or "pills", haw haw haw).

I'm surprised actually that so little time or depth was given to the "digital magazine" side of things more, which still feels like the big "exclusive" thing this device would be driving, instead having a disproportional focus on iWorks trying to convince students and the like that this could feasibly replace their laptop (it wont)

The iPhone is nothing more than a 3.5" tablet computer. I've said that many times.
 
Gary Whitta said:
I hope someone is keeping tabs on some of these posts so we have nice crow-eating thread a la Avatar in a few months' time :lol


hey I was totally waving the "Avatar will be huge" flag.


This, I just don't see it.

Maybe it's just because everyone I've spoken to is completely underwhelmed by it, whereas with the iPhone it was massive excitement.
 
Marty Chinn said:
I'm not sure why people are high fiving a zing against the MS Courier when Apple didn't even come close to showing something to be celebrating over.

Neither has MS. When MS delivers the Courier and has a fleet of real software like the video it'll get it's due praise. Until then it's just PR piece.
 
Marty Chinn said:
I'm not sure why people are high fiving a zing against the MS Courier when Apple didn't even come close to showing something to be celebrating over.

Because the Courier doesn't even exist yet.
 
SnakeXs said:
Neither has MS. When MS delivers the Courier and has a fleet of real software like the video it'll get it's due praise. Until then it's just PR piece.

Ya but nobody is saying MS knocked it out of the park. If anything, people were jumping on MS for not showing it at CES. Seems like a weak deflection point because of Apple's shortcomings rather than MS failing or even boosting which they didn't. The only thing being said is it looks like MS at least looks to be trying something interesting and different by comparison.
 
It will find its market and grow from there to become what the iPod and iPhone have become, its just going to take time. I really excited to see this in 2-3 years. If only it had a stylus and a note taking thing for lectures, that would be awesome :)
 
I can't see the iPad as anything but a MASSIVE FAIL.

For ~$850 I can get a Dell 17" laptop, an iPhone 3G, AND a Kindle.

Why would I spend that kind of money and get 1/2 the functionality?

Apple says they want to be at the intersection of arts and technology, but what use is a tablet you can't sketch on?

The iPad is a iPhone without the phone, and a tablet computer without the computer.
 
Gary Whitta said:
I hope someone is keeping tabs on some of these posts so we have nice crow-eating thread a la Avatar in a few months' time :lol

what going to change in a few months?

The things people don't like about it can't be fixed with software updates.
 
cjelly said:
I think the iPad is closer to the netbook market than Apple would let on, but I could absolutely see netbook people buying an iPad.
This is exactily what they are going for. This is their version of the netbook. But the thing is, you can buy a cheaper netbook with more power, more storage, real keyboard etc.. for almost half the starting price of this. Now obviously this thing has a Touch Screen which jacks up the price. But in terms of usability, the netbooks can do more for less.

The people that buy netbooks are looking for a cheap computer, the Apple brand may help sale the thing to these consumers but I still feel if they had a choice they would either pay for the cheaper Netbook or pay a little more and get a nice laptop.

And yeah the Ipad will probably be easier to use for the uninformed, but normal people really only browse the web and check email, and if you don't know how to do that on a normal computer...

This thing is still going to sell though, especially with apple's recent successes and their marketing power.
 
Gary Whitta said:
Yeah I use WriteRoom a lot because I'm too easily distracted and blanking out all other apps and windows is sometimes what it takes to get me to focus.

i do the same... i even activated the single app mode in mac os x and for me there is no going back... as i see multi tasking is way over rated by people that havent tried single tasking
 
If the MS Courier is anything like the video, then it won't even compete with the iPad. They will be two entirely different devices: iPad for fun, Courier for work. I could see many people buying both. That is what I will do if the Courier lives up to the video.
 
Tobor said:
I really think multitasking just isn't ready yet. They're going to want it to work well before they introduce it. No "Advanced Task Killer" in the app store, please. :P
I buy that, but I don't think we need to downplay the merit of multitasking in the meantime.

And with current revs of Android OS, Advanced Task Killer really just caters to control freaks because the system controls resources behind the scenes very well now. It's a legacy app at this point.

mrkgoo said:
Assumingthe processor is optimized for it, the is allows for that already. Right now, I can type this message and at any time just close it open another app do want I need to there and come back.

I the speed of the device is fast enough, then it's practically imperceptile. I'm thinking it will have more ram allowig things to load very quickly and keep things like safari running with multiple pages cached.
That heavily depends on the app, some apps inflict a heavier startup cost than others, and whatever those apps may be caching in their saved instances. It's a prime reason why people rely on multitasking when document editing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom