Sony doesn't kill their consoles when a successor gets released. In recent generations they released a new generation every 7 years, but each console lasted for a dozen years or so.Bold of you to assume that next gen is happening in 2027. AFAIK the last statement from Sony at least is that we're only about halfway through this gen. So unless something has changed then I don't see next gen happening until at the earliest 2030.
I'm on PC so next Gen is already here.
What are you looking forward to next Gen, path tracing? I've been enjoying that since 2023. good gif though, I really laughed.
Normally I would agree but there's multiple factors that make this a unique exception to the standard 7-8 year cycle. The first being that the consoles released during the pandemic. That alone delayed the entire industry (and truthfully the world) by two to three years MINIMUM. Second, the inflation index alone would bar most of these companies from turning profits of any sort even years post launch of a new platform. Third, the price of RAM isn't coming down ANYTIME soon and in fact will probably continue to go up. Those three reasons are enough to reasonably suspect that Next Gen is still a WAYS off. To be honest, to think otherwise is pure unfiltered hopium.I think we'll get the next gen released around a year and a half from now, and I think it's ok, but I think the current gen has a ton more to offer during many years more.
I don't feel this gen is getting old, I think it's starting to gets its main games now. As an example this year with games like RE Requiem, Marathon, Pragmata, Marvel Tokon, Onimusha, Wolverine, GTA6, 007 or the new Control. I assume next year may get the next big games (also the first non PS4 gen games) from people like ND, SSM or big IPs like CoD.
So while I think next gen getting released is cool and I can't wait to see what it offers and how good games look there, I also think it's going to be totally fine to continue some years more in the current gen and instead of getting a base PS6 on release day (as usual) I'll be able to wait and get PS6 Pro at launch whenever it releases around 3 years later or so. Particularly because rising budgets very likely will force its games to be crossgen with PS5 gen and related portables (which could include the Sony one).
Sony doesn't kill their consoles when a successor gets released. In recent generations they released a new generation every 7 years, but each console lasted for a dozen years or so.
Meaning, what they meant is that PS5 will continue alive until at least 2032 or so. Which doesn't mean that they'd release PS6 in 2032 or so. Very likely PS6 will be released November 2027 keeping the 7 years distance tradition.
Normally I would agree but there's multiple factors that make this a unique exception to the standard 7-8 year cycle. The first being that the consoles released during the pandemic. That alone delayed the entire industry (and truthfully the world) by two to three years MINIMUM. Second, the inflation index alone would bar most of these companies from turning profits of any sort even years post launch of a new platform. Third, the price of RAM isn't coming down ANYTIME soon and in fact will probably continue to go up. Those three reasons are enough to reasonably suspect that Next Gen is still a WAYS off. To be honest, to think otherwise is pure unfiltered hopium.
Kudos for being an optimist. I just don't see it happening.The consoles are coming out as long as MS/Sony can get the materials.
Wasted yes.Yea all that wasted power on 60fps. What an insane comment to read for a first reply.
Consoles have stopped being "new developments in gaming" since circa AMD taking the lead on h/w for all console makers.I don't know man... Sad to see gaming enthusiasts not enthusiastic about new developments in gaming. It's literally one of the two things you spend on for this hobby. Hardware and Software. I know money doesn't come easy for everyone, but not even looking forward to it requires some level of disillusionment and cynicism towards the activity that you love...
It's like a Ferrari lover rolling their eyes when a new Ferrari is announced. You don't need to buy it, but are you not even excited for it? Not criticizing the majority here. You feel what you feel and expressing it is honest. But it's just sad to see that's where we are as a community.
You didn't like Elden Ring, Astrobot or Baldur's gate?What power if all games will keep carry on with cross-gen releases, lmao, I barely played anything worth it on PS5, can't imagine how lame the PS6 library is gonna be...
They certainly were this gen with I/O. Not sure how much it ended up mattering though.Consoles have stopped being "new developments in gaming" since circa AMD taking the lead on h/w for all console makers.
Not saying that it's AMD's fault (although to some degree it is; they have been incredibly slow with h/w advances since GCN1) since this is mostly driven by the economy of production but it is what it is.
PS4/XBO were boring as hell, using low end CPUs and mid-range GPUs.
PS5/XS weren't much better although they did use somewhat modern CPUs but all that amounted to as of now are all games running at 60 which to me as a PC gamer first is a waste.
This next gen will probably be similar to this one, so nothing too exciting aside from possibly RT becoming ubiquitous which would be nice, been waiting since 2018 for that.
Yes, all this is true.Normally I would agree but there's multiple factors that make this a unique exception to the standard 7-8 year cycle. The first being that the consoles released during the pandemic. That alone delayed the entire industry (and truthfully the world) by two to three years MINIMUM. Second, the inflation index alone would bar most of these companies from turning profits of any sort even years post launch of a new platform. Third, the price of RAM isn't coming down ANYTIME soon and in fact will probably continue to go up. Those three reasons are enough to reasonably suspect that Next Gen is still a WAYS off. To be honest, to think otherwise is pure unfiltered hopium.
This is just my opinion, but when we started to hyper fixate on things like FPS and resolution, we took many steps backwards into this new form of neo tribalism. Games are "bad" now if they don't have 60-120 FPS or have hyper realism and ray tracing. We've reduced the hobby down to numbers and stats rather than admiring if for being a form of art. Obviously that doesn't apply to everyone, but this is just what I've observed. They always hit back with "I have standards, console peasant." It's like… okay, but does your standards allow for nuance and can you even identify a good game or are we just gonna continue to hyper focus on numbers that mean literally nothing to anyone outside of the game engineers and financial departments?I don't know man... Sad to see gaming enthusiasts not enthusiastic about new developments in gaming. It's literally one of the two things you spend on for this hobby. Hardware and Software. I know money doesn't come easy for everyone, but not even looking forward to it requires some level of disillusionment and cynicism towards the activity that you love...
It's like a Ferrari lover rolling their eyes when a new Ferrari is announced. You don't need to buy it, but are you not even excited for it? Not criticizing the majority here. You feel what you feel and expressing it is honest. But it's just sad to see that's where we are as a community.
I mean, for consoles it mattered like A LOT. For PC though? I've been running games off SSDs since late 2000s.They certainly were this gen with I/O. Not sure how much it ended up mattering though.
What is the new development? Like what are you getting out of it?I don't know man... Sad to see gaming enthusiasts not enthusiastic about new developments in gaming. It's literally one of the two things you spend on for this hobby. Hardware and Software. I know money doesn't come easy for everyone, but not even looking forward to it requires some level of disillusionment and cynicism towards the activity that you love...
It's like a Ferrari lover rolling their eyes when a new Ferrari is announced. You don't need to buy it, but are you not even excited for it? Not criticizing the majority here. You feel what you feel and expressing it is honest. But it's just sad to see that's where we are as a community.
Their I/O APIs made them faster for the exact same drive speed. DirectStorage is helping but it's not well supported.I mean, for consoles it mattered like A LOT. For PC though? I've been running games off SSDs since late 2000s.
It's mostly useless. PCs did have an NVMe support problem but this one isn't down to DXS, it's down to drivers which are emulating SCSi up till this date.Their I/O APIs made them faster for the exact same drive speed. DirectStorage is helping but it's not well supported.
Why buy a PS6 Pro 2-3 years after when you could get a PS7 2-3 years further out? At the end of the day people need to make a decision to buy in or wait based on their desire for available games.Why even buy a ps6 when they release a ps6 pro 2-3 years after and all games in the meantime and 2-3 years after are crossgen with ps5 anyway, hell with 6-7 year dev times not even sony can guarantee when and if first party games are releasing now.
What is the new development? Like what are you getting out of it?
Consoles have stopped being "new developments in gaming" since circa AMD taking the lead on h/w for all console makers.
Not saying that it's AMD's fault (although to some degree it is; they have been incredibly slow with h/w advances since GCN1) since this is mostly driven by the economy of production but it is what it is.
PS4/XBO were boring as hell, using low end CPUs and mid-range GPUs.
PS5/XS weren't much better although they did use somewhat modern CPUs but all that amounted to as of now are all games running at 60 which to me as a PC gamer first is a waste.
This next gen will probably be similar to this one, so nothing too exciting aside from possibly RT becoming ubiquitous which would be nice, been waiting since 2018 for that.
The same thing you get out of a new bow, if you are into archery. Or a new model of a racket, if you are into tennis. Or a new car, if you are into racing.
This is the thing once cynicism sets in. Mere evolution is not enough. People want a revolution every few years. Anything short of that is... boring? Sounds pretty jaded to me.
Path tracing, once seen as an unachievable holy grail being available in real time, is mind blowing to me. The fact that a whole ass game level with all its complexity can now load in 2 seconds is mind blowing to me. What Sophy does in Gran Turismo is mind blowing. How that could inspire other devs to implement actual AI (as opposed to scripted routines) in gameplay is exciting. A lot of these have generational dependencies, so a new generation automatically brings excitement, if you are into that sort of thing.
It's all mind blowing because I'm a gaming enthusiast. By definition, the little advances should matter to an enthusiast. Otherwise, what's the difference between an enthusiast and a casual consumer that just likes to be loud on the internet? It's fine to be a casual consumer, that's their prerogative. But if that's what the majority of this forum is, then this is either not the place for enthusiasts or gaming enthusiasts are becoming a dying breed. Or everyone is just jaded with the hobby altogether. All of that makes me sad is all.
Probably the first time im not.
Feels like current gen is untapped and Microsoft wants to merely jump the gun to remain relevant.
Fair enough. I certainly obsess over tech more than it is necessary, so I will concede to that.The jump between PS5 Pro and PS6 will be the smallest "generational leap" we've ever had. I don't need a PS6 to keep enjoying videogames whereas, in the mid 1990s, you really needed a PS1 to start getting all this 3D stuff that just didn't exist before.
The jump between Pro and PS6 isn't a generational leap. But I certainly believe the jump from PS5 to PS6 is going to be bigger than PS4 to PS5. When devs get onboard with path tracing and stop paying any attention to baked lighting, cross gen will start looking really ugly. And when they stop baking lighting altogether or build anything fundamental to the game on top of the ML hardware (for rendering or otherwise), the base consoles will truly be left behind, just like the jump to 3D.The jump between PS5 Pro and PS6 will be the smallest "generational leap" we've ever had. I don't need a PS6 to keep enjoying videogames whereas, in the mid 1990s, you really needed a PS1 to start getting all this 3D stuff that just didn't exist before.