BibiMaghoo
Member
Good for him. I wish him the best.
donotbelievehisgies.gif
I don't think you can use cosplay to give a character feminist cred. Cosplay has long had an undercurrent of unreconstructed objectification, ever since guys at old cons were leering at 14-year-old Heidi Saha dressed as Vampirella and buying her "pictorial history."
http://junglefrolics.blogspot.com/2010/01/much-of-whats-written-about-heidi-saha.html
I guess this explains the recent promotions that Allegra Frank and Chelsea Stark got and announced on the Polygon Show last weekend. I think Polygon is one of the media outlets that gets an unnecessary amount of flak on GAF and gets dismissed by people every time there's a Polygon thread.
I visit the website regularly and they consistently output solid content such as the aforementioned podcast and their feature articles are the best in the business. I mean sure, there are dozens of GoT articles and Pokemon news but hey it gets the clicks to fund more feature articles so I don't mind because I don't read them.
That being said I never read much of Gies' work but I never understood the hate that he gets aside from being what? Xbox fanboy? Okay, cool. Everyone has favorite games on different platforms. I don't agree with a good chunk of Jeff Gerstmann
You are tunnel visioning incredibly hard on just one remark in his comment.
If women find a Bayo to be empowering, then she is an empowering female character to them. That's worth discussing even if you think the development intentions may have been different than the outcome.
I'm pretty sure everyone is aware that it's not perfect, it's made in Japan. There just aren't that many games that offer this particular experience.
So the whole, the theme of her attacks is 'sexiness.' ... I'm having fun with the team thinking, 'So what should we do with Bayonetta to make her look sexy?' And they're like, 'Oh, maybe this move might be good. This motion might be good.' So that's what we're thinking right now."
This disappointing reply is the original reason I didn't respond to your post. You seem interested in derailing the thread toward ad hominem, which is a bad place to go considering GAF's strict moderation that could penalize me for firing back. Fool me once.
If his history at Polyon is an indicator he is probably going to study MS Paint.
I feel like if you worry about your response getting you banned, doesn't that make what you're thinking a bit of an issue?
I understand the issue some people have with Bayonetta's character design. My problem is that I don't believe you're coming at it from an honest point of view.
The nearly sarcastic sounding "I thought GAF was woke" comment was strange and I really think that if your first description of the problematic outfit a woman is wearing is that it's "slutty," it clouds your entire argument.
There are many women who were telling Arthur that they thought Bayonetta was an empowering woman. His brushed them off as if he knew what he was talking about more than them. This comes with a history of acting as if his opinion was the opinion. If you even politely questioned him, he was known to block you on Twitter. And then, in your defense of Arthur's article, you called the character "slutty."
Sorry, it just sticks out. We don't need to go back and forth on this any further before it stays too far from the topic of Arthur's history but any man using the word "sluty" to describe a female character's clothing in an attempt to defend women is really off the mark in what they're doing.
Holy pretention.
"I hope I made the world a better place" says man who wrote product reviews for one portion of the entertainment industry.
He's right. It sounds like he does understand it better than her. This "if you criticize even the most depraved and demeaning objectification, you're not being sex positive" cudgel is the one GamerGate loves to beat Anita Sarkeesian with.
All I'm going to say about this is that it's classic ad hominem. You don't have an argument here. You have straw version of me with dishonest, sinister and suspicious motives you've created to attack, eagerly and ignoring my attempts at apologia for the poor word-choice. It's shameful and pathetic.
Holy pretention.
"I hope I made the world a better place" says man who wrote product reviews for one portion of the entertainment industry.
Eh, it's hard to say that someone is "sex positive" when they promote the idea that women must be paid escorts because they are "too hot" for their dates.
Lost all respect for Gies when he hitched his wagon to that horse.
Wait, what? I must have missed that one.
Pretentious? Nah. Read one of Tim Rogers' War and Peace-length articles on Kotaku for that. Gies is just a self-important blowhard. He'll fit in well with a graduate student art class with that temperament.
You tried to edit it just to add the word "pathetic" but replied twice instead.
Thanks. I'm keeping the second one because it is pathetic.
there was some hubbub about a minecraft party where the women in attendance were attractive. ( so someone assumed Notch paid them to be there and twitter shenanigans ensued)
You're handling this back and forth in a very Arthur Gies fashion, to be honest.
If you want to continue arguing, please PM me instead as I don't feel comfortable going back and forth here now that you've decided to become insulting towards me.
there was some hubbub about a minecraft party where the women in attendance were attractive. ( so someone assumed Notch paid them to be there and twitter shenanigans ensued)
You're handling this back and forth in a very Arthur Gies fashion, to be honest.
So you criticism him instead of her who took indirect passive aggressive shots at him?
What does her working for Nintendo have to do with it? Why does that make her right and him wrong?
Furthermore, she is obviously strawmanning as I sincerely doubt Gies has a problem with the mere fact that Bayonetta is sexy, but rather the particular way in which it's portrayed.
Finally, "mansplaining" is often misused as a bullshit gotcha card, with the implication being that a man can never be right and a woman wrong about feminist issues (not that Gies is right here and Rapp wrong regarding Bayonetta). A lot of it is tone, of course, but considering Rapp was the one starting the condescending bullshit in this Twitter chain, I can understand his reflex to respond in kind
Again, looking at this situation, it appears Rapp started shit with Gies because she didn't agree with his opinion about Bayonetta. I don't know why you are singling out Gies here. I understand that in other instances he has come across terribly, but in this particular situation he was just defending himself, and I don't believe he said anything out of line.
Yes, I'm criticising him going out of his way to try to try to correct somebody.
Someone posted his Twitter conversation with Rapp and I wasn't the first one in the thread to think he looked bad in that exchange.
Yes, she started the argument. Because she took issue with his mansplaining article.
Exactly this. She is in a better place to comment on a female character being used a sex positive icon -- and whether or not it's successful -- than he is. And yet, he decided to try and act as if he knows better in the situation. He doesn't.