Is this true? Please let this be true.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Assassin's Creed Unity - PC Performance thread
- Thread starter MayMay
- Start date
Is this true? Please let this be true.
Porygon is a fake site I think.
World looks fine with 4x MSAA. But what the hell is going on with the player/NPC models? They all look blurry. :/
google translate makes it look like hes suffered from a long term gambling problem lol
LOL!
jim2point0
Banned
Yeah. Seems like the game runs fine to me. Though it certainly doesn't look as impessive as I'd hoped. I haven't seen it in person in order to judge, but based on these screenshots.... eh.
Lockjaw333
Member
I would definitely turn them off then. 10fps hit for slightly more realistic shadow edges at a distance? Nah brah.
Yeah, I don't understand. Even if you can't get a stable 60 fps, you're still getting 30+ more FPS than consoles can hope to dream for and higher resolutions!
What is going on here?
lashman
Steam-GAF's Official Ambassador to Gaming-GAF
Still looks blurry and dat AA good grief still seeing jaggies.
Yeah I noticed that too. If that is on max settings, it's really disappointed.
SliChillax
Member
My 4GB GTX680 is crying... I play at 1440p 
It does have a performance penalty, of course, but it's usually within reason and makes a huge difference.
MSAA doesn't work for texture/transparency aliasing.
FXAA is honestly the best compromise in a game like this. I don't know why they didn't include somehting like SMAA with a temporal filter. That woudl be godly.
Fuck, when r we getting MFAA from Nvidia? Anyone know anything?
dampflokfreund
Banned
He has a High End PC with one of the best GPUs in the world. He is totally right and you are defending bullshit, that is ridiculous.
Gaffercake
Member
What did PC maxed AC4 look like? Anyone have any shots?
nelsonroyale
Member
Hrmm, those PC shots don't look so awesome either. Seems PC has some of the roughness as well.
How do they explain the console performance?
ME. And they are silent about codes. I asked them 3 times today on twitter and no answer from them.
"It's designed for NEXT-next-gen consoles."
Thaumaturgic Tomato
Member
Little known historical tidbit: During the reign of Louis XV, the nobles in Versailles wore cowpies on their heads to distinguish themselves from the lower class commoners and farmers. The fresher the pie, the better for molding.
In preparation for palace parties, it was usual for a nobleman to save the cowpie for last, often making a servant recover the contents directly from the cow by hand, to achieve optimum malleability. Those with freshest pies were the envy of the party and gained royal favor.
I say these cowpie heads are emulated perfectly.
Out of curiosty how much did you pay for that PC?
SliChillax
Member
What's the Vram usage at max settings?
KINGofCRA5H
Member
Looks good. What kind of FPS are you getting with that? Playable?
Didn't Black Flag have that?
Chance Hale
Member
Take the resolution up to 2560x1440 so I can know what to expect My 780Ti is at least a bit better, TXAA is definitely something I want so I might have to end up turning the crazy shadows off. There is 2X and 4X TXAA right?
And FXAA is a horrible abomination, while TXAA adds a slight blur FXAA just pours Vaseline all over the screen while still leaving aliasing everywhere.
My 780Ti is at least a bit better, TXAA is definitely something I want so I might have to end up turning the crazy shadows off. There is 2X and 4X TXAA right?And FXAA is a horrible abomination, while TXAA adds a slight blur FXAA just pours Vaseline all over the screen while still leaving aliasing everywhere.
Take the resolution up to 2560x1440 so I can know what to expect
Nope - just "TXAA" so who knows if thats 2X or 4X
Not sure off hand. The 970s were $349 a pop. Forgot how much CPU and Mobo was. Case was about $80. HDDs vary due to sales. Monitor was $799.
AC III texture settings doesn't work.
AC IV texture settings doesn't work.
AC U texture settings... it seems doesn't work.
I guess texture quality is the same but the pool size is what you can change with the option.
Time to break out the LN2
My GPU is better - I got a 780ti, and will report my stats once I get the game. The 970 and 980 are also better.
In the meantime, what exaclty were you expecting? I'm not denying that anvil next is a DOG. The game doesn't look much better than previous games did on PC and forthe way ti looks it should be running better, but this is an engine thing.
His card is running the game at a higher reoslution, on higher setitngs and at double the framerate of a PS4. Sounds about right for a GPU that's about twice the power of a PS4. RIght on what we would be expecting - given the obvious limitations of this engine.
So the long and the short of it is that ACU looks much, much better.These are not maxed out but settings are high enough
alexandros
Banned
He has a GPU that is roughly 2-2.5x the raw power of the PS4 GPU. He's running the game at a resolution that is roughly 45% higher than the PS4 (1080p vs 900p), at double the framerate and at higher visual settings. The game's performance seems absolutely fine to me.
Edit: Heh, beaten like a chump!
jim2point0
Banned
Black Flag had SMAA, FXAA, MSAA (up to 8x), and TXAA (2x\4x).
I think maybe you're remembering that game wrong. It look alright... but not better than what I've seen form Unity so far. I'm seeing the same issues that Black Flag had in terms of NPC models and LOD.
800 for the display?
Wow.
Zombie James
Banned
Regular old MSAA really doesn't cut it anymore. It doesn't cover shader aliasing at all, for example.
Similar threads
- Poll