Not that 1080 isn't piddly by this point, but you are not playing those games at that resolution even with a Tri-SLI setup.
Yes, you can. All you need to do is to lock these games at 30fps, i.e. the same fps as most console games anyway.
Not that 1080 isn't piddly by this point, but you are not playing those games at that resolution even with a Tri-SLI setup.
Yes, you can. All you need to do is to lock these games at 30fps, i.e. the same fps as most console games anyway.
Some pixelation in textures/fire at that resolution. If l had your GPU setup i'd rather play with supersampling at 1080p.
Well, I know this isn't a personal screenshot (it's from the Dead Kings DLC trailer), but it looks cool. I really like the atmosphere in this shot.
The order has 100% ingame custscenes and they are even interactive. you won't stay passive in many of them and you can control what the character does like when he is checking his gun, you can move your hand to turn it around in the cutscene to check more angles of it. You can move the scope and zoom in in the part where the character is checking sth far in the cutscene. etc.
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/gaming/...-cinematics-and-gameplay.html#~oWq3PGmIHzhTpn
I'd rather play in 1080p/60fps than 2160p/30fps quite honestly.Once you go 4K, you don't go back, especially on a 4K screen. 1080p even with amazing AA looks lackluster in comparison. Unless of course the gameplay requires high fps/refresh-rates. I lock the newest games at 30fps and play in 4K at the best settings possible to maintain that framerate.
Some of these games nowadays just look insane on high end hardware.
The problem I have with The Order (I looked at the gameplay footage for about 30 mins last night) is that it seems to be a 'smoke-n-mirrors' kind of game. The graphics footage looks photoreal and CG no doubt. But they are able to do that by putting the gamer on rails most of the time. During that footage, there was only 1 scene where you could both control the camera a full 360 degrees longitude and latitude as well as move the character at the same time. All the other footage was basically reminiscent of "House of the Dead" kind of gameplay. Perhaps this is what people are complaining about with the game. It's too scripted and controlled.
the aditional aa options are worse than what the ps4 uses so no point in even mentioning them
Once you go 4K, you don't go back, especially on a 4K screen. 1080p even with amazing AA looks lackluster in comparison. Unless of course the gameplay requires high fps/refresh-rates. I lock the newest games at 30fps and play in 4K at the best settings possible to maintain that framerate.
Some of these games nowadays just look insane on high end hardware.
I'd rather play in 1080p/60fps than 2160p/30fps quite honestly.
Ryse cutscenes have been confirmed to be pre-rendered, but they share the same models as the gameplay.
No they aren't. Not if you have MFAA capable graphics cards (the 900-series boards).
They did it with Uncharted 2, 3 and the last of us.
Anyone have a screenshot of that the prophet from Ryse?Not all of them. Easy to see when you have a GPU that isn't capable of a locked 60FPS - the in engine stuff will drop frames whereas the videos won't.
And yeah, AC:Unity is stunning in terms of complexity and the lighting is fantastic.
However, the character models are not on a par with Ryse. Nothing is. I realise that AC:Unity is doing more, but Ryse has significantly better IQ to me. I just think it looks better. And yes, of course a linear action game would, but that's besides the point. I've yet to see anything that tops Ryse in terms of character models, especially the facial animation. AC:Unity's faces look super videogamey and suffer from the same weird low-res skin that Infamous had.
Anyone have a screenshot of that the prophet from Ryse?
And Nero
I really don't understand this.
Do people really think that Naughty Dog can do something that hasn't been implemented before at other companies and ONLY on the PS4? Like I'm not sure why people think this. The rationale seems to be that ND will produce something on the PS4 that cant' be done on a high end PC. Why? The PS4 *is* a PC albeit a downsized one.
things that cant be done on a PC? no of course not. but i think uncharted 4 will be graphically far ahead of anything on the pc for quite some time should it be a 30 fps title.
Nope, Star Citizen will practically kill any tech race for next several years.
Holy shit! O.OI have something better. This is how normal soldiers look like:
They did it with Uncharted 2, 3 and the last of us.
Trust me. It isnt this way at all. It's linear, sure, but it certainly is no house of the dead.
Also, if you can interact than it's not a cutscene.
It's nice to finally have another high budget PC exclusive that will look better than any game for years, disproving the console magic myth. 50+ million dollar budgets are nice!Nope, Star Citizen will practically kill any tech race for next several years.
i expect uncharted 4 to look much better than star citizen, even if star citizen does have a longer list of tech features.
its so well documented how useless the hardware aa methods are in this title. every single tech portal that has covered this game has come to the same conclusion, stay away from anything other than fxaa.
But they didnt. There is not a single tech feature in ND games that was not available in games on PC, except for indirect shadows tech for characters in TLoU.
I don't get what you are saying. MFAA is an Nvidia-only feature. It will support the list of games that is on the list. Has nothing to do with Ubisoft. The other AA methods in the game are too taxing for even the best hardware. If that's a problem for you.. oh well.
Holy shit! O.O
Nah, it would be like saying that Crysis 3 looks worse than TLoU.
Star Citizen will like Crysis 3, 'mid gen' game, before next gen.
neither txaa nor 4xaa are too taxing, they just have extremely lousy coverage. mfaa doesnt fix anything, it just provides a perf boost for "4xaa"
They are too taxing for AC:U. As most people gain 10fps switching to FXAA. I get the equivalent of 4XAA with the speed of FXAA. That's a good tradeoff for having a 900-series card.
you dont get 4x msaa at the speed of fxaa, you get it at the speed of 2xaa. and you are missing my point. its not about performance, its the fact that msaa/txaa in this game provide horrible AA coverage
Has P.T. Demo been modeled after your house?
Has P.T. Demo been modeled after your house?
How do you mean? That sounds mighty blurry in comparison, he'd be better turning on FXAA in AC:U...no? The jaggies aren't even that bad.
I don't quite understand 1080p with super sampling tbh that much :S Downsample all the way to 1080p from 2160 ?
So the PS4 owners are hoping that UC4 and The Order 1886 will dethrone (graphically) anything that plays on the PC at MAX settings even though it's hardware is nowhere near as powerful? Is that what I'm hearing?
So top 2 games currently on the PC that destroy anything console related:
AC:Unity
Ryse
Hmm.. pretty bold hopes..
i expect uncharted 4 to look much better than star citizen, even if star citizen does have a longer list of tech features.
Imo this thread isn't giving Killzone:Shadowfall the love it deserve in regards to technical prowess, I'm pretty sure the game is using every kind of graphics tech under the sun.
I suspect you will need to eat massive amount of crow.
Yeah, it does deserve mention.
This many?I suspect you will need to eat massive amount of crow.
When i buy PS4, i'll definitely buy KZ:SF. I love the area lights speculars.I just hope to see as much tech pushed on pc as possible because I'm in for the high end PC experience too. I've seen killzone screenshots and I get this urge to play it solely for that reason but then I see the overall gaf opinion about the game and I just don't know... Maybe if I'll get it cheap or used.
Right now, in term of "how incredible this graphics looks" DriveClub is superior to AC Unity.
You (Veteran_FX) are very, very passionate about this game and this is nice, I respect that ... really, but I think you need to be a little bit more objective ... well, just saying ...
Is it really all that fair to compare two games that are completely different in all regards to what they represent. IMO both will be as equally as impressive in what they set out to be.I suspect you will need to eat massive amount of crow.
.
pc games dont take proper advantage of the hardware. and ryse on pc is near identical to the xbone version.