• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Batman v Superman Ultimate Cut |OT| - Men are still good (out now)

Cider X

Member
It's an improvement over the TC for sure. The pacing is better (though still completely off at times, those dream sequences... Urghhh) and the expanding of subplots does the movie good and sets up character motivations much much better. I'd rate the TC 5/10 and the extended cut 7/10.
 

cr0w

Old Member
Nope, and Jena Malone i
sn't Barbara either
:/



Well that's just because you guys didn't (and apparently haven't yet) get that they weren't Batman movies, but Bruce Wayne movies - which Nolan said right from the beginning.

"Batman Begins"

Yeah, totally not a Batman movie. Bruce Wayne = Batman, no matter the semantics you want to get into. And don't start this, "you didn't get it" shit, because I guarantee you wouldn't react well if someone told you that you didn't "get" BvS. You can "get" something and still not like it. I know what Nolan gave us, and I didn't like it.

Easy there partner. It's going to take a lot more than THE TWO OF US

I'm looking to see if it's a good movie. Not this "bad batman movie" silliness. Like what kind of backwards mentality is that?

Does the cut make the movie better a la Kingdom of Heaven? Or are the issues from the TC still present throughout the film regardless of how much fat is on this thing?

There's a way to be a bad Batman movie while still being an overall good film. If a good film destroys (in someone's eyes) a character, that doesn't make it a bad film. It's like how Skyfall was a bad Bond movie, but still a good, well-made movie. Or take the Raimi Spider-Man movies (the first two, at least). Good, well-made movies. But to me, terrible Spider-Man movies.

The second question is up to you, but you admitted you won't watch it until much later so it won't be answered for a while.
 

jmood88

Member
But IS IT GOOD NOW?
The answer depends on you. If you don't like the dark deconstruction of your childhood heroes, this is not the movie for you. If you can see pass that, yes, it's an interesting and almost mature (with its flaws, and a very comic-y third act) take on a classic story that might be too convulted for his own good. But that's kinda its charm, it didn't take the easy route.
Ok, Deborah Snyder.
 

Mengy

wishes it were bannable to say mean things about Marvel
I'm waiting until the 19th to see the blu ray. I didn't care for the theater version and I doubt that this UC will fix my problems with the film, BUT I am going to give it a chance. My gut feeling could very well be wrong. Looking forward to what others think in the meantime while I wait for the 19th to roll around.
 

Anth0ny

Member
I'm actually really excited to watch this. Haven't watched BvS since opening day, been waiting for this. steelbook should be in today :)
 
30 minutes less means more showtimes which means more potential $$$. So basically it was hubris that led to a lot of this.

I mean, you could probably put together a much, much better 2:30 cut than the one we got. It's not just hubris, it's also terrible editing.

That "men are still good" is supposed to be the big lesson of the movie makes me laugh.

I, too, laugh at the truth.

It's a terrible nervous tic, it freaks people out.
 

Ahasverus

Member
You're not coming off that way to anyone who isn't familiar with you.
Well it seems I'll have to add this bit to the OP

What does still not work?
- Some plot contrivances are still there.
- It might be too long.
-
The kryptonite spear retrieval by Lois is still a big hole.
There is no explanation as to why she goes for it.
- We still have no idea how Lex knew who Batman/Superman were.
- The Martha moment is still good on paper, bad on execution.
- It's a sloooooow burn. It starts more like a thriller than an action movie.. then turns into a generic action movie in the third act.
- The motivation/knowledge to create Doomsday is still MIA.
- Superman is a little too tortured by everything. Poor guy.
- The dream scenes are jarring and have no place in the narrative
- The JL cameos are still out of place.
- The action is kind of lackluster and lacks physicality.
-
Batmurder
 

Grizzlyjin

Supersonic, idiotic, disconnecting, not respecting, who would really ever wanna go and top that
Any mention of the dead Robin's name?

Nope. This isn't a new sandwich. You're getting a bigger burger, but no extra toppings. The scenes that were added just expand subplots that were already in the movie. You'll have a better grasp of what people were doing, but there aren't any cool things like that. There is a tiny thing with Lex that WB put up on YouTube awhile back. It's mainly just beefing up the first 2 acts of the film.

It's a conflicting experience because if someone wanted to watch this, I would have to recommend this cut because it lets you grasp the full scope of what they were attempting. But the pacing is even worse with the extra time added on.
 

shoreu

Member
y6wQxN2.png


Found it for 20 here.
 

Daft_Cat

Member
Wait-what?

Dudes, there was a reason why Batman Begins/The Dark Knight was good and this wasn't.

There's some serious overselling of this movie going on here.

Yup. Also, Snyder using the term "deconstructive" as a defense for BvS rubs me the wrong way for three reasons:

1) What, exactly, is being deconstructed here? I guess there's an effort to deconstruct the relationship between the people of earth and Superman... but as far as his actual character is concerned, I don't see it. What I do see is an arguable misinterpretation of Superman as a character. The same goes for Batman, whose philosophy is definitely challenged (if not flat out misunderstood by the filmmakers), but not really "deconstructed".

2) "People don't like their heroes deconstructed." Or, in other words, it's not that the film is tonally jumbled, narratively flawed and poorly put together - it's simply that it wasn't quite what audiences wanted! Otherwise, a job well done!

3) Deconstructive narratives are typically regarded as self-reflective, as well as structurally and thematically challenging. For Snyder to suggest that the film was dismissed by the majority of critics and some fans because it was "deconstructive" is basically like saying "2smart4u", which is bullshit.

I'll definitely watch the extended cut. Didn't *hate* the film as much as a lot of people, but man does Snyder's attitude strike me as pretentious in the midst of what is clearly a huge shift in direction moving forward.

Dude should just come out and say "Yeah - I had my head up my own ass a bit," and so much good faith would be restored.
 

Toa TAK

Banned
There's a way to be a bad Batman movie while still being an overall good film. If a good film destroys (in someone's eyes) a character, that doesn't make it a bad film. It's like how Skyfall was a bad Bond movie, but still a good, well-made movie. Or take the Raimi Spider-Man movies (the first two, at least). Good, well-made movies. But to me, terrible Spider-Man movies.

Let me rephrase this then:

Is the film good? Regardless of how the characters were adapted from the comic? Batman Begins and The Dark Knight were good films because of how the characters and story were handled despite what the source material said. It's an adaption so things like that will change for better (Spider-Man 2, The Dark Knight) or worse (Spider-Man 3, X-Men The Last Stand).

To me, the source material doesn't even factor into the conversation because the move is going to stand on its own no matter what. Most people seeing this don't know the ins and outs of these characters as well as most here would believe and they don't care either. I don't care about the source material as I go into these things, I just want the movie to be good. BvS was a bad movie with unlikable characters and a senseless plot. If BvS Ultimate Cut somehow undoes that, that's great! But if it still suffers from this, then why bother?
Well it seems I'll have to add this bit to the OP

What still doesn't work?
- Some plot contrivances are still there.
- It might be too long.
-
The kryptonite spear retrieval by Lois is still a big hole.
There is no explanation as to why she goes for it.
- We still have no idea how Lex knew who Batman/Superman were.
- The Martha moment is still good on paper, bad on execution.
- It's a sloooooow burn. It starts more like a thriller than an action movie.. then turns into a generic action movie in the third act.
- The motivation/knowledge to create Doomsday is still MIA.
- Superman is a little too tortured by everything. Poor guy.
- The dream scenes are jarring and have no place in the narrative
- The JL cameos are still out of place.
- The action is kind of lackluster and lacks physicality.
-
Batmurder
Gah. I was afraid of this, but thanks for putting this together anyways.
 

atr0cious

Member
That "men are still good" is supposed to be the big lesson of the movie makes me laugh.
Wait, America nukes their savior and that's what you got out of it? If anything, its that Superman exists because good men are a rarity. It's the reason Bats tries to kill Clark afterall.
 

IconGrist

Member
Yup. Also, Snyder using the term "deconstructive" as a defense for BvS rubs me the wrong way for three reasons:

1) What, exactly, is being deconstructed here? I guess there's an effort to deconstruct the relationship between the people of earth and Superman... but as far as his actual character is concerned, I don't see it. What I do see is an arguable misinterpretation of Superman as a character. The same goes for Batman, whose philosophy is definitely challenged (if not flat out misunderstood by the filmmakers), but not really "deconstructed".

2) "People don't like their heroes deconstructed." In other words, it's not that the film is tonally jumbled, narratively flawed and poorly constructed - it's simply that it wasn't quite what audiences wanted! Otherwise, a job well done!

3) Deconstructive narratives are generally self-reflective, and thematically challenging. For Snyder to suggest that the film was dismissed by the majority of critics and some fans because it was "deconstructive" is basically like saying "2smart4u", which is bullshit.

I'll definitely watch the extended cut. Didn't *hate* the film as much as a lot of people, but man does Snyder's attitude strike me as pretentious in the midst of what will clearly be a huge shift in direction going forward.

Dude should just come out and say "Yeah - I had my head up my own ass a bit," and so much good faith would be restored.

You realize that line was from Deborah Snyder, right? Lol
 

cr0w

Old Member
Let me rephrase this then:

Is the film good? Regardless of how the characters were adapted from the comic? Batman Begins and The Dark Knight were good films because of how the characters and story were handled despite what the source material said. It's an adaption so things like that will change for better (Spider-Man 2, The Dark Knight) or worse (Spider-Man 3, X-Men The Last Stand).

To me, the source material doesn't even factor into the conversation because the move is going to stand on its own no matter what. Most people seeing this don't know the ins and outs of these characters as well as most here would believe and they don't care either. I don't care about the source material as I go into these things, I just want the movie to be good. BvS was a bad movie with unlikable characters and a senseless plot. If BvS Ultimate Cut somehow undoes that, that's great! But if it still suffers from this, then why bother?

Gah. I was afraid of this, but thanks for putting this together anyways.

That's really going to be entirely up to you. There's nothing anyone can say that will matter more than your own opinion on it. I'm a massive champion of the UC, if I had the ability I'd give you my Vudu credentials to check it out but, alas, that wouldn't work.

I really don't mean to come across as hostile about the film, if it seems that way. I just feel really strongly about it, but in the opposite way most do.
 

Bleepey

Member
Well it seems I'll have to add this bit to the OP

What still doesn't work?
- Some plot contrivances are still there.
- It might be too long.
-
The kryptonite spear retrieval by Lois is still a big hole.
There is no explanation as to why she goes for it.
- We still have no idea how Lex knew who Batman/Superman were.
- The Martha moment is still good on paper, bad on execution.
- It's a sloooooow burn. It starts more like a thriller than an action movie.. then turns into a generic action movie in the third act.
- The motivation/knowledge to create Doomsday is still MIA.
- Superman is a little too tortured by everything. Poor guy.
- The dream scenes are jarring and have no place in the narrative
- The JL cameos are still out of place.
- The action is kind of lackluster and lacks physicality.
-
Batmurder

Doesn't Clark supposedly give her a look like get rid of the spear, and when she sees Doomsday eye blasting everything she realises it's Kryptonian in origin.
 

Toa TAK

Banned
That's really going to be entirely up to you. There's nothing anyone can say that will matter more than your own opinion on it. I'm a massive champion of the UC, if I had the ability I'd give you my Vudu credentials to check it out but, alas, that wouldn't work.

I really don't mean to come across as hostile about the film, if it seems that way. I just feel really strongly about it, but in the opposite way most do.

What no, you're not coming across as hostile at all. It's all good here. ;)

But after the recent information Ahasverus put up, I feel a lot more at ease knowing both the issues and fixes.
 

IconGrist

Member
My bad. Still, she's his wife, and the producer of the movie. Doesn't really change the substance of what I'm saying. That's clearly the line the filmmaking team is towing.

Nah, I got you but it was just amusing to me, haha. Zack did basically admit maybe his view of the characters was not what people wanted. It was one of the rare times where what he said sounded smarter than what his wife said.
 

Dead

well not really...yet
Doesn't Clark supposedly give her a look like get rid of the spear, and when she sees Doomsday eye blasting everything she realises it's Kryptonian in origin.
I dont remember the look.

But its not even a plot hole, she can clearly infer what is going down based on the info she knows. It's the epitome of nitpicking.
 

Ahasverus

Member
Doesn't Clark supposedly give her a look like get rid of the spear, and when she sees Doomsday eye blasting everything she realises it's Kryptonian in origin.
The first part is true, but she doesn't see a fire blast, she sees an energy explosion. I mean, you could guess she is using her detective abilities to make a super quick conclusion, but it could have been executed better. I bet the script said that she saw some Kryptonian stuff, but it isn't translated well by the SFX team.
Great OT, Ahasverus.
Thank you Guek!
So after all the speculation and expectation, Jena Malone ends up being who?
STAR labs director. An actual character from the comics... of the 70's.
 

IconGrist

Member
Doesn't Clark supposedly give her a look like get rid of the spear, and when she sees Doomsday eye blasting everything she realises it's Kryptonian in origin.

Nah, there's no look. She clearly makes the same assumption of Doomsday's origin as Batman does. I don't know why people take such issue with it. Yea it's a bit unnecessary but made sense just because it was Lois. She loves Clark and wanted to get rid of the one thing that can kill him then realized they need it to kill Doomsday (who was not around when she threw it away) so she tries to go back for it. If Batman had thrown it away and then was like "shit, my bad" that would be really weird.
 
Jason Todd obviously

Their not gonna kill Damian until the batman and Robin movie

I'm still feeling the idea that the "dead" Robin is Dick Grayson and that he's not actually dead but instead became The Joker we see in Suicide Squad, since Dick becoming The Joker happened in The Dark Knight Strikes Again, and we all know how much Snyder loves Miller...
 
I dont remember the look.

But its not even a plot hole, she can clearly infer what is going down based on the info she knows. It's the epitome of nitpicking.

Not particularly. It's an extremely clunky way of putting Lois in danger(again). Why even write that she tosses the spear in a convenient pool? Just leave it on the ground.
 

IconGrist

Member
Not particularly. It's an extremely clunky way of putting Lois in danger(again). Why even write that she tosses the spear in a convenient pool? Just leave it on the ground.

Why would she want to leave it there? So someone can just happen upon the only thing in the world that can kill her boyfriend?
 

Alienous

Member
I'm still feeling the idea that the "dead" Robin is Dick Grayson and that he's not actually dead but instead became The Joker we see in Suicide Squad, since Dick becoming The Joker happened in The Dark Knight Strikes Again, and we all know how much Snyder loves Miller...

Man, I hope it's just Jason. Seeing as Snyder likes Miller so much, I hope he reads The Dark Knight Returns - The Last Crusade; that's a damn good Batman story that would hopefully inform Snyder's perspective of Frank Miller's Batman.
 

Blader

Member
I, too, laugh at the truth.

It's a terrible nervous tic, it freaks people out.

uh...huh? I did't say it was a lie, lol. I'm just saying it's laughable that that's supposed to be the theme.

Wait, America nukes their savior and that's what you got out of it? If anything, its that Superman exists because good men are a rarity. It's the reason Bats tries to kill Clark afterall.

No, I didn't get that out of the movie at all. But it's in the title of the thread and was repeatedly batted around the last OT as supposedly the moral of the movie.
 
Top Bottom