Neuromancer said:I've played worse.
Hey unlike Call of Duty Black Ops, at least there isn't an infinite amount of enemy spawns.Sega1991 said:"This isn't the most foul smelling turd I have sniffed."
Yeah on a technical level it's fine.Warm Machine said:It doesn't look awful at all. The colour palette is based off the movie which is pretty monochromatic from what I can tell. It looks like an FPS done at completely average level. Not great, not terrible.
I just got back from seeing the movie and the length isn't surprising at all considering the screen shots are only from 3 scenes in the movie, most of which the are last battle.Htown said:Yeah on a technical level it's fine.
But still. Forty-five minutes.
I was noticing things seemed to blow up real good in your stream, At least it has that.Htown said:Yeah on a technical level it's fine.
But still. Forty-five minutes.
That's fucking hilarious. Wow!Htown said:Yeah on a technical level it's fine.
But still. Forty-five minutes.
I've played longer Atari 2600 games. That's pretty damn weak.Htown said:Yeah on a technical level it's fine.
But still. Forty-five minutes.
I NEED SCISSORS said:Microsoft, if you have sense, you will not give the Halo: Combat Evolved remake to these guys.
You forgot option 3: a short campaign that's complete shit. That's the option that this game falls under.get2sammyb said:Probably a bit unfair. They probably had like six months to make it. The video actually looks ok, so they were probably smart to make a short campaign that's fine, rather than a drawn out campaign that's complete SHITE.
Unlike CoD though, you can actually clear out an area before you move forward. The enemies don't just spawn infinitely. Now I'm not saying this is the better game because of it, but that is a point in this game's favor.Shig said:You forgot option 3: a short campaign that's complete shit. That's the option that this game falls under.
People complain that modern FPSes are glorified shooting galleries; This is by far the most literal application of that. Move on a straight path into a little carefully-arranged set and take your mark, several aliens pop up and just stand there waiting to be shot. The movement is plodding, the guns feel horrible, there's no feedback to hitting an enemy, and there's no satisfying indicator that you've killed one, they just sort of slink out of view of your sights and leave you saying "oh, I... guess they're dead."
If you've ever said a bad word about Call of Duty and even think about rushing to this game's defense, fuck you. This game makes COD's gameplay look like Quake III Arena.
Adam Prime said:You mean Resistance 3 ISN'T the offical tie in/
Neuromancer said:Unlike CoD though, you can actually clear out an area before you move forward. The enemies don't just spawn infinitely. Now I'm not saying this is the better game because of it, but that is a point in this game's favor.
Also I think it's kind of satisfying when you kill one of the pumpkinheads at range with a sniper rifle.
I never said there weren't.Sega1991 said:There are many, many, many other, better games that offer both these things.
45 minutes? LOLHtown said:Yeah on a technical level it's fine.
But still. Forty-five minutes.
I loved it and a lot of other people liked it too, couple hated, but I'd say more positive than not. Check for the thread in the OT.wondermega said:um... how's the film?
It's pretty good. A decent popcorn movie.wondermega said:um... how's the film?
wondermega said:um... how's the film?
SHOTEH FOCK OP said:Should have been a free "adver-game". Cycle through different trailers every time the game boots up. Maybe a "commercial break" a couple times during the playthrough with the movie trailer. Why not? Seems like it would do more good in the long run.
But then CoD has a huge multiplayer section that people can spend 100's of hours playingHtown said:if you think about it, it's basically the same campaign hours per dollar as a CoD or a lot of other games. Is 10 bucks for 1 hour really that much worse than 60 dollars for 5 hours?
Zenith said:Twice as long as the game!
Rated-Rsuperstar said:Would have been funny if the Resistance 3 billboard was in the game as well.
Dark Octave said:I think some people are expecting too much from a $10 game. It's not fair to compare it to CoD.
On top of this, it's a game that's based on a movie, and we all know that those are always the best games ever made.
Giant bomb could do a quick look of this game and itd wind up being the endurance run.Htown said:Yeah on a technical level it's fine.
But still. Forty-five minutes.
beefy jerky baby! BEEFY JERKY!Manos: The Hans of Fate said:45 minutes? LOL
Man I'm saving my 10 bucks for seeing the movie again or some beefy jerky.
I'm curious as to why you're so bent out of shape about it. :lolSega1991 said:I don't see why anybody feels the need to apologize for this game or justify it somehow.
It's crap. End of story. Yes, it's only $10, but you know what? Dead Rising 2: Case Zero is $5 and is almost three times longer than this is and way, way, way more fun to play.
Neuromancer said:I'm curious as to why you're so bent out of shape about it. :lol
Come on dude. We're talking about a $10 XBLA movie tie-in FPS here. You are, essentially, shitting on shit.