lockload said:Another shot the OP decided not to post
http://i.imgur.com/jGI8u.jpg[IMG][/QUOTE]
I think I can see why. Game looks awful before it's finished, shock and awe.
lockload said:Another shot the OP decided not to post
http://i.imgur.com/jGI8u.jpg[IMG][/QUOTE]
I think I can see why. Game looks awful before it's finished, shock and awe.
Only if you do it badly. Contrary to popular opinion the class of troll is important.starok said:And console trolling from PC GAF continues...
Funny that if you try to troll PC you'll get ban in less than 10 minutes.
Yes, yes I would. I'm a massive cock.kpop100 said:I'm mostly a PC gamer and even I'm finding these topics to be unnecessary. I mean if you were a Ferrari owner would you stop beside every Toyota Corolla on the road and laugh at the driver? Probably not.
Anerythristic said:3. In 4 to 5 years I can just buy a new PC for 500 or so dollars and hook it up to my TV, no upgrading no taking the thing apart and plugging in things and installing things, once again I'm a consumer not a hobbyist.
IchigoSharingan said:Seniors: Master Race
Juniors: PS3/360 crowd
Freshman: Wii gamers
starok said:And console trolling from PC GAF continues...
Funny that if you try to troll PC you'll get ban in less than 10 minutes.
Izayoi said:Shots downscaled to their native res...
http://www.abload.de/img/720p3j7uy.png[img]
[img]http://www.abload.de/img/720p2zjx9.png[img]
[img]http://www.abload.de/img/720p128ra.png[img]
Definitely time for a new generation no matter which way you cut it, though.[/QUOTE]
or lets wait for the Final Build and then compare ?
Kabouter said:So many cases, and not one you could actually put in your living room.
That would be far too sensible for a place like GAF.Pranay_ said:or lets wait for the Final Build and then compare ?
I think we can work a car analogy in here too. An owner of a tuned Honda Civic is more likely to get into a heated car debate with a Toyota Celica owner than a Ferrari owner.Ysiadmihi said:In the interest of fairness, DICE should announce a Wii version so 360/PS3 gamers have something to troll.
The best part about all of this is once the game is out, 360 and PS3 gamers will be at each others throats over barely noticeable differences between the two versions, all the while telling PC gamers that graphics don't matter. You know, the same thing that happened with Crysis 2.
Yeah, was just looking at the full size cases listed for that PC he linked. That mini thing looks fine.IrishNinja said:aw, im not just gonna sit here & let you spit on my Evo. she's not a looker, sure, but she's built for speed!
I say that like 99% of people complaining about huge visual difference right now won't be able to see any difference if they simply up the resolution to 1080p in the next generation. Because really that's the main difference between consoles and PC at the moment.ClovingSteam said:What say you?
You can build a mini/micro ATX machine that shits all over consoles and looks great doing it. There are plenty of living room appropriate computer cases.Kabouter said:Yeah, was just looking at the full size cases listed for that PC he linked. That mini thing looks fine.
loldr_rus said:Because really that's the main difference between consoles and PC at the moment.
dr_rus said:I say that like 99% of people complaining about huge visual difference right now won't be able to see any difference if they simply up the resolution to 1080p in the next generation. Because really that's the main difference between consoles and PC at the moment.
Something like this will sit next to a home cinema amp happily.Kabouter said:Yeah, was just looking at the full size cases listed for that PC he linked. That mini thing looks fine.
Seriously. There are many flaws to PC gaming, but none of them involve something you can seriously troll. Every flaw just involves how much time and effort you care to put in to maintaining your rig.Ysiadmihi said:Well when most console trolls consist of things that are true and most PC trolls are "LOL $2500 FOR BARELY BETTER GRAPHICS AND NO GAMES", it's not hard to see why.
Izayoi said:
see5harp said:I really don't think console users have a problem saying that PC versions usually look and perform much better. It's just hearing it from someone who doesn't even play console versions or much less play consoles that makes it burn. Why should he care about what I am playing? He's getting his DX11 enhancements, ability to tweak FOV, and finally decent controller support so I don't get why he's so concerned.
IchigoSharingan said:There is actually a laundry list of differences, from shadows to textures, to effects, to HBAO to tesselation and.....I could go on.
StuBurns said:People who are never going to play this on console are bitching that it looks shit on there? Why do you give a fuck? Some childish shit.
LordCanti said:I'm face palming so hard right now. Unfinished build, encoded to make bandwidth demands lower for DICE (they just want to see bugs according to the guy that leaked the video on reddit), and a low ass resolution to top it all off.
The finished game is not going to look like this. Seriously people, the game has been demo'd on PS3's over and over again at PAX, Gamescom, etc, and it looked just fine. They aren't going to put out a 360 version that looks like the leaked screenshots/video look. They just aren't.
ghst said:thread totally misses the point. consoles are right where they need to be, nestled between the dvd players and the white kitchen goods walmart. not everyone is some neckbeard forum posting enthusiast who knows who releases what, when and for which platforms, they just want to pick up some set top videogame box on the way home from work, sink back into their couch and blow away some dudes.
i mean of course people like us want options, but we're gamers, enthusiasts, not the majority. we've got our nvidia 580s and amd 6950s and you just know we're gonna clock those things till steam rises out, but not everyone is a connoisseur. people buying consoles probably don't even know the difference between a ps3 and 360 other than one plays that indiana jones game and one plays the motorcross spaceman game; that's fine, that's exactly who they're for. people like these are precisely why a tumbling price and longer generation can only be a good thing, who are we to tell them how much they should be spending?
gaf can be so myopic at times.
see5harp said:I really don't think console users have a problem saying that PC versions usually look and perform much better. It's just hearing it from someone who doesn't even play console versions or much less play consoles that makes it burn. Why should he care about what I am playing? He's getting his DX11 enhancements, ability to tweak FOV, and finally decent controller support so I don't get why he's so concerned.
You deserve tagging for this. In a nice wayAnerythristic said:you could go on because you give a shit about any of that stuff, i have no idea if its good or bad that i have no idea what half of those things you mentioned are. is the game fun or not? is first on my list. does the game run at 1400p and have superior tessalation and HBO is like fifteenth on my list, probably lower to be honest. so i guess pc gaming is really not for me. i mean i can't even tell the difference in feet per second.
Yeah, but you also probably cranked the AA/AF, did you not? There are many things aside from resolution that go into making PC games look better than their console counterparts.Ysiadmihi said:Well to be fair, something like Xenoblade at 1080p in Dolphin looks better than most 360/PS3 games I've seen.
The main difference is that people sit close enough to a PC monitor that 1080p matters. A lot. That's typically not the case for the consoles. HDTVs are farther away and they have excellent scalers. BF3 is going to look just fine in the living room.dr_rus said:I say that like 99% of people complaining about huge visual difference right now won't be able to see any difference if they simply up the resolution to 1080p in the next generation. Because really that's the main difference between consoles and PC at the moment.
Sn4ke_911 said:For the doubters.
/thread
StuBurns said:People who are never going to play this on console are bitching that it looks shit on there? Why do you give a fuck? Some childish shit.
Ysiadmihi said:Do you say the same thing about comparisons between 360/PS3/Wii? Just curious.
Izayoi said:Yeah, but you also probably cranked the AA/AF, did you not? There are many things aside from resolution that go into making PC games look better than their console counterparts.
starok said:I don't see any comparison thread made from PS3/360 gamers whose purpose is just to shit on the wii version.
Well you could tell me that's probably because there aren't any new games coming to wii anymore too.
duckroll said:For your sake, I hope I never see you talking about how a multiplatform game on the Xbox360 looks worse than the PS3 version... again! Pot/Kettle?
duckroll said:For your sake, I hope I never see you talking about how a multiplatform game on the Xbox360 looks worse than the PS3 version... again! Pot/Kettle?
I'm virtually 100% sure I have never complained about anyone playing an inferior version of any game. Not Bayonetta on PS3, or FFXIII on 360, or anything else. I've certainly never made a thread just to mock an audience.duckroll said:For your sake, I hope I never see you talking about how a multiplatform game on the Xbox360 looks worse than the PS3 version... again! Pot/Kettle?
see5harp said:Stating that PC versions look better isn't exactly what is happening with this thread.
They can be. They were destroyable in BC2.MarkMclovin said:Why do I have a feeling those telephone poles can't be taken down, yet whole buildings can?
see5harp said:Stating that PC versions look better isn't exactly what is happening with this thread.
Regardless, this is not a comparison thread, it's a point and mock consoles thread.duckroll said:Did I use the word better in my post?