• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Best software to listen to music on your PC?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I moved around a while then settled on Winamp last year. It's the only thing I've used that can easily organize and separate 50+ gigs of music across multiple genres (hello category tag).

Nothing is worse than mixing genre naming conventions.
 
I've been using iTunes for ages, I just really like the way it grabs album art for my songs. But I do have a question... I know that there are several freeware tools for filling in missing pieces of song tags, but do any of them actually work well? I feel like the songs that I have that are missing/have incorrect tags won't be caught by them because of typos or something.
 
Only one for me is Foobar due it being very customisable:

llFKyMy.jpg
 
I've been using iTunes for ages, I just really like the way it grabs album art for my songs. But I do have a question... I know that there are several freeware tools for filling in missing pieces of song tags, but do any of them actually work well? I feel like the songs that I have that are missing/have incorrect tags won't be caught by them because of typos or something.

http://www.mp3tag.de/en/
 
foobar2000 is good if you enjoy messing about getting it look just how you like. I used to use it all the time but after losing all my settings once I decided to try something else.

Now I use MusicBee. Superb program that looks great as is, has lots of useful features and a small footprint.

Other notable mentions are Spotify (which is fine as a music player but not so good as a music manager) and classic Winamp just coz.

Stay away from iTunes (on Windows), unless you have to use it. The new one especially has such a bad interface, and I have no idea why it's always so sluggish.
 
Checked out MusicBee last night from the posts in this thread, really liking it so far. I've tried out a few other ones over the years, but feels like I've been using Winamp for close to 15 years now, so it's nice to change it up to something that looks like it will stick.
 
It's 2013, and if you're not using some sort of streaming service (namely Google Play Music or Spotify), you're doing it wrong. 320kbps streamed audio is basically indistinguishable from lossless to anything but an oscilloscope.
 
The only thing that's stopping from completely getting me to switch to Play Music fulltime is the lack of a desktop player/the web player having desktop playback controls. (well that and the fact that Google doesn't consider Canada a real country)

There are unofficial desktop players but i don't really trust em.
 
foobar is terrible...Whichever way I try to organize my music, by artist, album, or song, it always manages to **** the order up somehow.

Browse by Folder Structure

Main reason I use foobar. I don't have to fuck with tags or anything. Just name the folder and that's how it shows up in my player.
 
It's 2013, and if you're not using some sort of streaming service (namely Google Play Music or Spotify), you're doing it wrong. 320kbps streamed audio is basically indistinguishable from lossless to anything but an oscilloscope.

That's great if everything you want to listen to is actually available on a streaming service.

I use foobar2000, as much for its robust custom metadata support as anything else.
 
used to use zune, but since MS stopped support switched exlusively to itunes.

Gotta say, itunes on mac is still the best software for that OS, and th pc version has improved a lot too.
 
It's 2013, and if you're not using some sort of streaming service (namely Google Play Music or Spotify), you're doing it wrong. 320kbps streamed audio is basically indistinguishable from lossless to anything but an oscilloscope.

I'll keep an actual library thank you very much
 
you can't. you have to do science to make that thing even remotely good. Why would you want to deeply invest time in making a music player pleasant to use? I could never figure out why you would spend more than 10 minutes on this stuff and installed musicbee. Seems alright.
I don't do it any more, but I used to enjoy learning and coding foobar layouts. If you spend a lot of time in the program then why not set it up to be perfect for you?
 
I prefer iTunes. I don't mind it being slower than the others. The UI is easy to use and aesthetically pleasing. It has some quirks but the integration between the iDevices negates all the negatives.
 
Foobar2000 is great, but for some reason it just cannot keep my music properly sorted. Every other media player I have used gets the ordering right too, it's pretty annoying.
 
I use iTunes but it's because of iTunes Match and having all my music from my laptop easily accessible in the cloud. If it wasn't for that I'd go back to using Foobar probably.
 
That's great if everything you want to listen to is actually available on a streaming service.

I use foobar2000, as much for its robust custom metadata support as anything else.

This is exactly why google music has become my go to service.... I keep everything there now because you can augment your own collection with what is available on the all access pass and its one place I can go to on any computer and access my entire collection.

Had been using zune/xbox music but having to manage a local collection became a chore especially when I have multiple computers trying to keep everything in sync and then keeping track of what was available through the zunepass. They really should have enabled a cloud music collection in skydrive years ago.
 
I never had much joy with he auto-tagging here but for manual jobs (adding artist, genre etc) I love it.

As for auto-tagging. I have had some joy with the graceonte support in newer versions of winamp (something like right click > send to > auto-tag).

It's 2013, and if you're not using some sort of streaming service (namely Google Play Music or Spotify), you're doing it wrong. 320kbps streamed audio is basically indistinguishable from lossless to anything but an oscilloscope.
Google is not this. Downloads via the browser (for me) are 22khz, 160kbs (for 44khz 320kbs you have to use the cummy manager app that only downloads newly purchased songs or the entire library, no options inbetween) so it would be absurd if streaming was better.

Spotify likewise is only that if you subscribe to the premium version.
 
The problem I have is I don't like iTunes either because its such a resource hog with my 250gb of music. Disk access lasts for ages each time windows loads up on this very fast PC.

However, I'm forced to use it because of my other Apple devices and iTunes Match. It synchs to them etc too.

Having said that though iTunes Match only let's me upload so much so its limited in that regard. I basically wanted iTunes Match to back up all my music to the cloud (or have some version of the song out there thats identical to mine so I can use iTunes Match to stream music to the iPhone instead of storing it locally on the phone) but it doesn't anymore as it's reached it's limit from my collection now. I think it was 200gb limit.

I wish I could use an alternative but Apple has backed me into a corner with iTunes.
 
I never had much joy with he auto-tagging here but for manual jobs (adding artist, genre etc) I love it.

As for auto-tagging. I have had some joy with the graceonte support in newer versions of winamp (something like right click > send to > auto-tag).


Google is not this. Downloads via the browser (for me) are 22khz, 160kbs (for 44khz 320kbs you have to use the cummy manager app that only downloads newly purchased songs or the entire library, no options inbetween) so it would be absurd if streaming was better.

Spotify likewise is only that if you subscribe to the premium version.

Yeah, that's not the case for me. I just downloaded a song from the browser that i had purchased a while back and it was 320kbps. I also downloaded another song that I had uploaded as a FLAC and it also came back down as 320kbps. The only song that was less than 320kbps was a 256kbps AAC that I had uploaded.
 
When iTunes updated to 11, I switched to MediaMonkey
because fuck that new interface, what was Apple thinking?? I MISS STEVE JOBS
and haven't even looked back once. Tried fubar and winamp and couldn't really dig either one.

Bro you can configure it to look just like it always has.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom