ElBoxyBrown
Banned
No retina display
Yep. Retina is godlike.
No retina display
2x USB C
2x USB 3.1 A
Headphone Port
Access to replace RAM/Battery/M.2
No Touch Strip
And maybe even $200/$100 off the current price (current intel/nvidia stuff)
Shit would fly off the shelves so damn quick.
Kaby Lake doesn't allow for 32GB with low-power DDR RAM (specifically LPDDR4 that they'd need to get to 32GB with the space they have) so they're stuck at 16GB until the next major Intel refresh after KL.Kaby Lake and 32GB of RAM seem like very likely additions, and would be enough to get me to buy.
Ideally, I'd like to see a slightly better GPU than the 4GB 460 they have in the BTO right now. Sure, a 1050/1060 would be ideal, but I can't imagine them going Nvidia. AMD works better with their pro software like FCX. But "better" would be nice.
And finally, I'd happily forgo the Touchbar in favor of better battery, but I highly, highly doubt that will happen.
now thats what i call edgy
A tiny minority? Bullshit, it's a total deal breaker for any software developer or IT admin. They even removed the physical Escape key. It's a stupid idea, period.
hugocésar;237020406 said:I have the 2016 MacBook and I'm pretty happy with it. Only major negative is that it feels like it's gonna blow up on my legs when I try and use chrome with it.
Maybe a re-designed Mac Mini?
I saw one in person for the first time recently and though it looked pretty huge.
Kaby Lake and 32GB of RAM seem like very likely additions, and would be enough to get me to buy.
Ideally, I'd like to see a slightly better GPU than the 4GB 460 they have in the BTO right now. Sure, a 1050/1060 would be ideal, but I can't imagine them going Nvidia. AMD works better with their pro software like FCX. But "better" would be nice.
And finally, I'd happily forgo the Touchbar in favor of better battery, but I highly, highly doubt that will happen.
2x USB C
2x USB 3.1 A
Headphone Port
Access to replace RAM/Battery/M.2
No Touch Strip
And maybe even $200/$100 off the current price (current intel/nvidia stuff)
Shit would fly off the shelves so damn quick.
Yep - forgot all about the RAM limitation by the CPU. Drats.
***
I "downgraded" from a top-spec 2013 15" to a 2016 rMB 12". I love the portability and battery life - but everything else kinda sucks if you need to do anything more than Word/Excel/Internet/Email.
Lightroom, even when just working through ~100 or so photos off your memory card for an import, is basically unusable. Just... awful. Beachballing just switching between photos.
I'm very, very eager to "re-up" to the 15", so I'm glad it looks like we might get an update, regardless.
What about the iMac?
A little surprised they would bother with the Air considering how poorly it shows itself. That screen is the dregs at any price, to be frank. It's awful to look at next to another Macintosh of any sort. Though if they lower prices on the MBP line (it's been a year now, so I wonder if they can), maybe the base 13" can move close to filling that space.
It's a $1,499 model now so it's tight. But I really prefer it to keeping the Air with poorer specifications, a poor screen, and larger dimensions.
hugocésar;237020406 said:I have the 2016 MacBook and I'm pretty happy with it. Only major negative is that it feels like it's gonna blow up on my legs when I try and use chrome with it.
2x USB C
2x USB 3.1 A
I'm waiting for Google to wake the fuck up and release a version of Chrome that doesn't turn my laptop into a volcano. Can't we have a lightweight browser in 2017?
Chrome on Mac is probably not a big priority for Apple considering how you can just use Safari instead.
Just chiming in to say I hate my touchbar mac with the passion of 1000 suns. They are going to drive me to a PC, and that is saying a lot.
Apple has nothing to do with Chrome for Mac.
Also unless you absolutely need to use Chrome for whatever reason, you should be using Safari.
It's not a MS-type case where you should swap Internet Explorer/Edge for an alternative as soon as possible.
Wonder what they'll remove from them this time.
Ditching flash is not a choice. If you want to do anything that uses flash then you can't. It's not very complicated. Things that don't don't.Yeah you're probably much better off using Safari and ditching flash IMO. Safari is made to conserve energy usage.
Why are you using Chrome when you have Safari right there?
2x USB C
2x USB 3.1 A
Chrome on Mac is probably not a big priority for Google considering how you can just use Safari instead.
I'd be all in for an updated 13" Air. Apple's managed to make the rest of the range completely unappealing.
Ditching flash is not a choice. If you want to do anything that uses flash then you can't. It's not very complicated. Things that don't don't.
32GB of RAM won't happen until they can go to LPDDR4, which won't be the case on Kaby Lake.
They also can't really go far outside 35W TDP for the GPU with the current design, which is the current limiting factor for how much GPU power they can squeeze in it.
Make an mbp with bigger ram options you fucks. It doesnt need to double as a shaving razxor.
I use firefox exclusively on all my desktop computers.On Mac I keep Chrome for the sole purpose of running Flash stuff.
Johnny Ive must be stopped before apple users hurt themselves.Jony Ive won't be satisfied until he can literally shave himself with Apple products.
On a battery powered device it's essential, the downside would be not having all the extensions you need but fortunately enough i have everything i need on Safari; on desktop i could see myself not using it.Do you guys prefer Safari to Chrome? Just wondering.
What would be the next tier? AMD 560?
Jesus Christ. I just bought a 2016 Pro today.
Maybe a re-designed Mac Mini?
I saw one in person for the first time recently and though it looked pretty huge.