vpance
Member
Two choices. LG OLED if you can afford it. Vizio P series if you can't
The upcoming Panny DX900 is really good too.
Two choices. LG OLED if you can afford it. Vizio P series if you can't
Most recommend at least 20Mbit for 4K streaming. That goes for all streaming services.
Being able to see Kevin Stacey's Manly face with more detail. Being able to see his greying hair with more clarity. Being able to watch him win the 2016 election with more colour.Off topic but I dont understand comments like this. What does 4K add to watching a show like House of Cards?
Oh the Samsung JU 6400 can't do 4k/60fps at 4:4:4 Chroma and no HDR too. So it won't be good for PS4 Neo right?
Thanks. Seems low considering 4K content *should* have a crazy high bitrate, but I just read that netflix 4K and a 4K Blu Ray are a huge disparity in quality. 4K streaming is compressed as fuck.
Do people actually think this thing will get near 4K with games?
I don't think the premium that is charged for OLEDs is worth it, at least right now anyway, I'd much rather a high-end LCD.
The upcoming Panny DX900 is really good too.
I have a 70" 4k set I bought late last year. UHD content via netflix looks great, but the bump from 1080p to 2160p is less obvious than 720p to 1080p. I also don't bother gaming in 4k because I value high frame rates more than extra pixels.
The set isn't HDR though. I saw it side by side with a more expensive tv and I honestly didn't see a difference. I would write it off as enthusiast fluff (like the audiophiles who insist that their platinum-plated, virgin blood-soaked speaker wire sounds so much better), but I'm partially colorblind.
Do people actually think this thing will get near 4K with games?
everyone is different... i personally think 50" and up is great... everyone saying you cant even tell on anything less than 55-60" are straight lying.
Thanks. Seems low considering 4K content *should* have a crazy high bitrate, but I just read that netflix 4K and a 4K Blu Ray are a huge disparity in quality. 4K streaming is compressed as fuck.
Have to ask, since you have a 2015 Sony, is yours excessively dark during 3D playback? I have a 65'' X850C.
Thanks. Seems low considering 4K content *should* have a crazy high bitrate, but I just read that netflix 4K and a 4K Blu Ray are a huge disparity in quality. 4K streaming is compressed as fuck.
Same with streaming 1080p and playing a 1080p blu-ray.Thanks. Seems low considering 4K content *should* have a crazy high bitrate, but I just read that netflix 4K and a 4K Blu Ray are a huge disparity in quality. 4K streaming is compressed as fuck.
I have the X830C which does not have 3D. I would not have purchased it, but got a deal for the 49" for $600 brand new, so I just jumped on it over the $700 1080p set I was eyeing (W800C). Was not even in the market for 4K until the price fell in my lap, and notice how good it scales 1080p and that nice small pixel density.
However, I do notice active 3D seems to be 'darker', but I think that is something that can be tweaked in turning off some things in the settings. Possibly with the color temps. I noticed it was darker in game mode, but that was because it defaulted to Expert 1 un-tweaked, so I changed it to Neutral in that mode, and it brightened right up like it is in TV watching modes. Maybe that will help?
Thanks. Seems low considering 4K content *should* have a crazy high bitrate, but I just read that netflix 4K and a 4K Blu Ray are a huge disparity in quality. 4K streaming is compressed as fuck.
Yea, I really don't know how they can get away with calling it 4K. These Netflix streams are likely the source of all the 'it looks no different to me' posts that stink up every 4K-related thread.
Get something bigger than 55". I cannot tell a difference whatsoever between 1080 and 4k on my 55" TV.
Straight up wasting your money right now. But good luck.
Probably because it is a 55" TV.
Maybe get an eye test. I have 27" 4K monitor and the difference in enormous. Like night and day. This isn't like 720p < 1080p.
Saying that, I'm not buying a new TV as an add on to a console which doesn't yet exist. I'll wait a year or so to see how PS4K takes off, and by then I'll probably just wait for PS5 tbh.
1k is a bit low, but if you're willing to push for 1.5/1.8k you'll easily find a good set.
Future proof? Better wait for specs to stabilize once UHDBR are out and the dust has settled.
lol k
oh ur banned lolololol
I have a Sony 65" Bravia and I love it to death. 4K is definitely worth it right now especially with the PS4K. Having an all in one machine that plays 4K Blu-Ray and upscales games is gonna be very worth it.
It has not been confirmed if the ps4 Neo will play 4k Blurays.
My girlfriend has a Phillips 4k TV and the input lag is atrocious.
Are there any 4k TVs with good input lag?
I'd ask that the other way - if given a choice - which would people care about? 4k or 1080p with marginal(potentially including framerate) improvements?CyberPunked said:Do people actually think this thing will get near 4K with games?
I mean, relatively speaking. I want it to be able to last 5+ years without feeling obsolete by the time PS5/etc comes out. I just wanna get one before Zelda U comes out (I just want a bigger TV for that, 65" is what fits in my living room - the 4K etc etc would be for future tech).
So you could say all 4k TVs out right now are obsolete
Well except for the ones out right now that are UHD Premium rated. =)
If it doesn't, then that might be the one of the stupidest moves yet by Sony. In fact, I believe that the sole purpose of existence for the Neo is to push the sales of 4K TV and content. And 4K Bluray is a big part of that.
If it doesn't play 4K blu rays, then anyone who buys a 4K tv just because of this console is an idiot. You will be buying a 4K TV to upscale to 4K that any 4K TV already does with the existing PS4.
games could potentially run at higher than 1080p, just not quite 4K, so the upscaling isn't extreme?
is that a thing?