Activision being money whore as usual so they're scared of offending the ever sensitive LGBTQ+ community.
Getting sick of this gay shit, tbh.
I never saw any backlash whatsoever for any previous games not letting you do this. Gender neutral options are a very recent, and appreciated development.
It sounds like you're just making excuses up to be upset by a cosmetic option in a game.
Right but I guess diversity means play with as many skin colors as possible, as long as you are American...Remember when we used to play as russians in cod? Good times and one of the best missions in cod history I might say.
Wait what.This is the same company that removed Nazis from a WWII game to not offend people.
This is the same company that removed Nazis from a WWII game to not offend people.
Lol imagine roaming through buildings, killing groups of bad guys, and they respect your made up gender while you shoot them in the face.
How about making a game from other nations perspective rather than only the American side?
It seems that people who are against it got triggered.Who cares? It would be ironic if leftists were triggered over that...
It is not like USA has a monopoly on game development. Also I recall some people complaining that "not-XXX is trying to develop the game about XXX and it is wrong" or something.How about making a game from other nations perspective rather than only the American side?
If you can’t see or manipulate your genitals, then what, in-game, objectively determines gender? Why aren’t you whatever you believe yourself to be?
How about making a game from other nations perspective rather than only the American side?
Remember when we used to play as russians in cod? Good times and one of the best missions in cod history I might say.
Does this mean that the + in lgbtq is for tanks and other military vehicles now ?
I am familiar with the distinction; I believe you misread my argument. In the absence of measurable physical indicia, then your avatar is already uncoupled from the reference of biologically expressed traits that are exclusive to one or the other sex. Without that frame of reference, your character is inherently neutral and complies with whatever gender identity you have in mind. They are a blank canvas as-is and are subject to the player's interpretation (absent other contextual evidence, of course). Introducing means to broaden that expression then implicates the notion of an avatar having a sex, altering the implicit freedom that otherwise exists (all examples of game that imply otherwise involve static characters, as far as I am able to recall).You're confusing sexe and gender: sexe is the biological or karyotypic part and gender is the neurological/mental part.
The problem is degenerate have make science revisionism and negationism to push for ideology in a way that actually contradicts gender theory, while dumb reactionary have no knowledge off neither biology or sociology and therefor "muh, only two genders" which is false.
I am familiar with the distinction; I believe you misread my argument. In the absence of measurable physical indicia, then your avatar is already uncoupled from the reference of biologically expressed traits that are exclusive to one or the other sex. Without that frame of reference, your character is inherently neutral and complies with whatever gender identity you have in mind. They are a blank canvas as-is and are subject to the player's interpretation (absent other contextual evidence, of course). Introducing means to broaden that expression then implicates the notion of an avatar having a sex, altering the implicit freedom that otherwise exists (all examples of game that imply otherwise involve static characters, as far as I am able to recall).
It is also somewhat bizarre Activision is going to have a script that manages to be politically correct on all of these issues for a period piece set in 1981, involving roided-out military killmongers nonetheless.