IW you need to sort out thius BS with Barrett and Intervention not being OHK even with Stopping Power...
Video example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xwyu88bwuEs
Video example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xwyu88bwuEs
TheOrange said:Regarding routers, even though games says your NAT is OPEN, you are still behind some sort of built in security / firewall measures. It's best to do some simple test. With friend(s) you having issues, both of you try playing w/o your routers. Connect directly to modem. If that solves the problem, try one person behind the router and other still not. Then, reverse the role. Hopefully, you will find out who's router is causing the issue. If it works when only one of you is using a router, there's chance that you run into problem where using a certain combination of routers cause connection issues to each other.
Cornbread78 said:Does using a modem wirelessly slow your playing reaction time in multiplayer? I mean, hundreads of time now, I have started shootign a guy with an RPD and stopping power just for him to turn around and kill me with one shot from an ACR. I don't lag on screen, but sometimes it feels like there is a processing delay.
Cornbread78 said:I always have 4 bars, IS information streamed/processed slower, ever theough I have a constant signal?
I don't understand what the video is trying to prove? Those were all terrible shots (the second shot is straight into the wall!) and should not have been a kill in any situation.F#A#Oo said:IW you need to sort out thius BS with Barrett and Intervention not being OHK even with Stopping Power...
Video example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xwyu88bwuEs
I don't know the tech behind it, but I have a couple of friends who used to play wirelessly on 360 and kept claiming that they had a much better experience with a cable.Cornbread78 said:I always have 4 bars, IS information streamed/processed slower, ever theough I have a constant signal?
:lol @ kaizenRSTEIN said:kaizen
F#A#Oo said:IW you need to sort out thius BS with Barrett and Intervention not being OHK even with Stopping Power...
Video example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xwyu88bwuEs
Jangocube said:IW really, REALLY need to fix OMA and noobtubing. I can't take it anymore. Terminal used to be so enjoyable before this build became popular.
You've obviously never been to FerrariChat.com...Hanmik said:If I had a Ferrari with problems I would complain to the one who sold it to me.. Not some Ferrari related fansite..
Exactly.divisionbyzorro said:And this has already happened, albeit painfully slowly. We complained about the 1887s and they got nerfed. We complained about the care package running, and it's getting nerfed. I have a feeling that if we keep raising awareness about the insanity of the Infini-Tube build, it'll get fixed too.
Shut up you!!!DeuceMojo said:@ kaizen
You see, Infinity Ward will need to disintermediate value-added schemas in order to recontextualize cross-media deliverables...*
*courtesy Web Economy Bullshit Generator
aku:jiki said:I don't understand what the video is trying to prove? Those were all terrible shots (the second shot is straight into the wall!) and should not have been a kill in any situation.
F#A#Oo said:not being able to shoot through a banana leaf is more bemusing.:lol
_Alkaline_ said:The fact is that few care about their W/L, so capturing points or planting bombs means nothing to them. They play objective games because those who are actually trying to win are easy prey. It's completely unbalanced - even worse when you consider that IW is practically ushering people to not play properly since nukes will win the game regardless of the current score. If nukes will win, why play properly? Might as well camp, rack up killstreaks and deploy a nuke instead. It's bullshit.
RavenFox said:This times a million. So many f'ing times the game throws me into a match on a losing team with two players left and 10 seconds on the clock. Once I joined a game that was over and I got a loss without even firing a damn shot. Please fix this shit IW.
No.clashfan said:Newbee question: can you zoom in and out with the scope?
The other night, I ran into a monster team as well. I figured they were grouped together after two matches - I was running with one friend and a bunch of random folks. Never before had I felt so outmatched. I consider myself decently quick on the draw, but their AR guys blew me out of the water in terms of sheer draw speed from long distance. Just speaking for myself, I was out-positioned, out-drawn, and out-knifed. Maybe it's just me, but CB KIT didn't help too, they knew my spots. The last match ended and none of their folks had a below 1.00 KD and though I wasn't at the top of the kill list on my team, I sported the highest KD on my team at something like 7 Kill and 13 deaths. My buddy was 1/12 and some other poor guy was 0/8.junkster said:For example, I played a team recently where there were several awesome snipers, two guys Ninja stabbing all over the damn place, a few assault riflers, and a couple grenade attachment OMA guys.
F#A#Oo said:IW you need to sort out thius BS with Barrett and Intervention not being OHK even with Stopping Power...
Video example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xwyu88bwuEs
clashfan said:Newbee question: can you zoom in and out with the scope?
kaizoku said:I think the bottom line is sometimes, for the average player, this game will rape you HARD. I have had some major outbursts at this game, most of the time due to lag or latency, the rest of the time at fuckbag players employing really annoying tactics. But then again, anyone who ever kills me is a dick, I'm not sure I've ever had a death where I didn't promise to piss on the guys grave and get revenge in 30 seconds. :lol the game induces rage when things dont go your way, I think people just have to get used to this thread being half bitching cos lets face it, when you're having a good game, someone else is having a bad one, and vice versa.
I've played for like 10 hours over the past 2 days and I havent run into mass noob tubers+OMA yet, but doesn't scavenger do the same? replenish grenades?
there was one game last night where the entire enemy team sniped, and it wasnt obvious 'fun' sniping, on roofs, in windows etc, it was proper hardcore, plant your claymores, hide somewhere completely invisible with cold blooded pro and wait. and wait. and wait. my team got picked off with ease, we eventually ran out of time in TDM and the scores were something ridiculous like 3500 to 1000. We got owned, but it felt like the other team didnt even turn up, they barely got halfway to winning before time ran out.
after the game I had to connect my mic and tell the lobby "THAT. WAS. BORING!". Next round no one was sniping and we had a good time :lol
Insaniac said:i can get behind this ONLY IF THEY REMOVE WASTELAND. ugh.
bobs99 ... said:And thats hit the nail on the head right there, when everyone for want of a better word just camps the game degenerates into the most boring thing in the world - I have a group of friends that insist everyone just camp and I cannot play with them, when I do I run and gun and still do better than them.
...and the reason why I outwardly hate snipers, despite knowing that they are 100% working as intended. :loldivisionbyzorro said:But snipers will pretty much always camp. That's what they're designed to do. That's how they're supposed to play.
kamspy said:I'd really like "classic killsteak" variations for the tactical games.
Just UAV, Basic air strike, and AI chopper gunner.
Guileless said:Is matchmaking not rank based at all? Because I just started playing multi and am level 4 and people in the sixties are shooting me like we're in the matrix. (I have never played any CoD multiplayer.) And I am by far the worst player every round which handicaps my team to the point that it generally loses and makes them cuss me.
Replace Airstrike with Predator Missile and Pavelow with Harrier Strike and I think you've got it.divisionbyzorro said:UAV/Precision Airstrike/Pave Low at 3/5/7 would be fun.
kamspy said:I'd really like "classic killsteak" variations for the tactical games.
Just UAV, Basic air strike, and AI chopper gunner.
Brian Fellows said:Its hilarious how the shitty players in this game just go from one trend to another in a desperate attempt to be less shitty.
It definitely does something with rank, as when my friends are the party leader, we get lower ranked people almost always.divisionbyzorro said:You gotta start somewhere
No, it's not rank based. It's based on some hidden formula that we don't get to see.
RubxQub said:It definitely does something with rank, as when my friends are the party leader, we get lower ranked people almost always.
It's not even fair. I feel like I'm beating up X-Mas newbs all over again :lol
divisionbyzorro said:Whoa whoa whoa wait back up a bit.
Are you proposing that the game does matchmaking based solely on the party leader? This blows my mind. I should get my level 14 friend to be the party leader from now on and see if this is true.
Mr. B Natural said:As much as I want them to nerf OMA and the knifing teleporting, if they nerf those down then the game will be even more camp-friendly as it already is. The noob tube is your only halfway reliable tool to take out campers in most maps. Frags are weak and Symtex isn't reliable or have the range. Then again, the noob tubing in this game has kept me away from hq since this game has been released...especially hc hq.
Without commando being as cheap as it is, it wouldn't be able to counter how oddly unbalanced ARs are in close range. You need to be able to teleport, or my Tar/shotgun will rip you up as fast or faster as a smg every time. You got through my mid-range fire, you got through my claymores, you deserve the kill.
Brian Fellows said:Does OMA allow you to switch more than once? I was under the impression you could only switch once.
Yeah, it definitely seems to key off the party leader.divisionbyzorro said:Whoa whoa whoa wait back up a bit.
Are you proposing that the game does matchmaking based solely on the party leader? This blows my mind. I should get my level 14 friend to be the party leader from now on and see if this is true.
divisionbyzorro said:You gotta start somewhere
No, it's not rank based. It's based on some hidden formula that we don't get to see.