Caipirinha
Member
So it's obvious this GAF has basically halved in popularity and frankly a lot of what is left is on the right wing end of the spectrum, and by
"right" I mean this new age angsty alt right sort of stuff. "Liberals stop doing X" and "[Insert obviously heinous thing] isn't that bad tbh" "Does Trump deserve a Nobel peace prize" (is this real life?) etc.
I'm aware there was an issue regarding claims of sexual harassment towards the founder of GAF, I know very little about him and almost nothing of the details of those claims however as a liberal and a progressive I did one thing at the time in order to determine whether or not I would stay: I looked for any sign that these claims were being properly investigated and verified by the police. As a liberal and a progressive I don't believe it is moral to conduct trial by the mob and "no smoke without fire" is a concept that has been used to justify pretty much every major far right crime in history.
At the time I couldn't find any evidence of these claims being properly investigated so they meant as much to me as any other unverified claim. I could claim that any one of you reading this has sexually harassed me and it would carry just as much weight.
That's not to say I am denying the events took place, that's the point, I have no clue either way and unless I'm missing something then that goes for every other member of GAF or it's apparent off shoot Resetera.
Furthermore, again as a liberal and progressive I feel that communities belong to the people who occupy them. Even in the event of these accusations being proved true, I would expect the founder to be punished accordingly and ideally GAF would fall to the hands of the community to manage itself. Immediately throwing the baby out the window the moment the claim appeared is pretty starkly in contrast to the history of progressive communities. Perhaps in the event of a prosecution but inability to gain control of the forum I could see the need to create a new one, but it makes me wonder if these claims were used as a pretext if that replacement was made literally within days of an unverified claim.
So please tell me I am missing something and that we don't just live in an era now where "right" and "left" are basically just tribes with no concept of ideology and any excuse to start a tribal conflict is good enough?
"right" I mean this new age angsty alt right sort of stuff. "Liberals stop doing X" and "[Insert obviously heinous thing] isn't that bad tbh" "Does Trump deserve a Nobel peace prize" (is this real life?) etc.
I'm aware there was an issue regarding claims of sexual harassment towards the founder of GAF, I know very little about him and almost nothing of the details of those claims however as a liberal and a progressive I did one thing at the time in order to determine whether or not I would stay: I looked for any sign that these claims were being properly investigated and verified by the police. As a liberal and a progressive I don't believe it is moral to conduct trial by the mob and "no smoke without fire" is a concept that has been used to justify pretty much every major far right crime in history.
At the time I couldn't find any evidence of these claims being properly investigated so they meant as much to me as any other unverified claim. I could claim that any one of you reading this has sexually harassed me and it would carry just as much weight.
That's not to say I am denying the events took place, that's the point, I have no clue either way and unless I'm missing something then that goes for every other member of GAF or it's apparent off shoot Resetera.
Furthermore, again as a liberal and progressive I feel that communities belong to the people who occupy them. Even in the event of these accusations being proved true, I would expect the founder to be punished accordingly and ideally GAF would fall to the hands of the community to manage itself. Immediately throwing the baby out the window the moment the claim appeared is pretty starkly in contrast to the history of progressive communities. Perhaps in the event of a prosecution but inability to gain control of the forum I could see the need to create a new one, but it makes me wonder if these claims were used as a pretext if that replacement was made literally within days of an unverified claim.
So please tell me I am missing something and that we don't just live in an era now where "right" and "left" are basically just tribes with no concept of ideology and any excuse to start a tribal conflict is good enough?
Last edited: