-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Canada deported hundreds to war-torn countries: government data (Reuters)
- Thread starter Croatoan
- Start date
FrankCanada97
Roughly the size of a baaaaaarge
Refugees are facing an 11 year wait time just to have a claim hearing. Canada is taking in more than it can handle.
Bruv, pass the salt.Leader of the free world lmao
Are you of the opinion that all people who claim refugee status should be let in? Or all people from particular countries? If it's just particular countries, which ones and why?I would expect this from Harper, but I am beyond disapointed that Justin Trudeau would continue this disgusting bullshit. What the hell.
Sure they have, but they don't really mirror reality. That it's possible to deport people into "safe areas" of Afghanistan is a fantasy.
Here's a good report about the situation for deportees in Afghanistan: https://www.proasyl.de/wp-content/u...Afghanistan_Broschuere_englisch_web_Mai17.pdf
Do you have any more objective sources that talk about this?
I would expect this from Harper, but I am beyond disapointed that Justin Trudeau would continue this disgusting bullshit. What the hell.
Justin Trudeau shapes policy. He's not the guy at the desk issuing the deportations.
Zaraki_Kenpachi
Member
Lol it's not even close to millions if you actually read the thread. But lmao indeedImported millions
Exported hundreds
lmao indeed. *rolleyes*
Are you of the opinion that all people who claim refugee status should be let in? Or all people from particular countries? If it's just particular countries, which ones and why?
I am against deporting those back to certain death.
TORONTO (Reuters) - Canada has deported hundreds of people to countries designated too dangerous for civilians, with more than half of those people being sent back to Iraq, according to government data obtained by Reuters.
I don't see the problem here. The fact that you guys can read this and think to shit on Trudeau is worrying. Its a very small number of deportations and considering they were deemed dangerous people ...ok?
bonesmccoy
Banned
I don't see the problem here. The fact that you guys can read this and think to shit on Trudeau is worrying. Its a very small number of deportations and considering they were deemed dangerous people ...ok?
read that again lol
I am against deporting those back to certain death.
I believe its already been discussed but I don't think anyones being deported directly to high risk zones.
Is that what's happening here?I am against deporting those back to certain death.
Muffin1611
Banned
Do you have any more objective sources that talk about this?
This isn't exactly an subjective source. It cites various sources, NGOs like Human's Rights Watch, Amnesty International etc. or reports from the UNHCR. If you want to read more about it, I suggest you look at one of those.
I don't see the problem here. The fact that you guys can read this and think to shit on Trudeau is worrying. Its a very small number of deportations and considering they were deemed dangerous people ...ok?
Not the people were deemed dangerous, but the countries they were deported to.
RiverShell
Member
would expect this from Harper, but I am beyond disapointed that Justin Trudeau would continue this disgusting bullshit. What the hell.
As another poster already stated, two years of Harper is included in that assessment.
Thanks, I am actually curious - reading (some of) the link you provided gave me an idea of a bit of the argument for taking in all claimants from Afghanistan, but I'm not really sold on all of them, and felt like I was reading something that was really pushing an agenda (and it might not even be a bad agenda, but I like to start as unbias as possible).This isn't exactly an subjective source. It cites various sources, NGOs like Human's Rights Watch, Amnesty International etc. or reports from the UNHCR. If you want to read more about it, I suggest you look at one of those.
Muffin1611
Banned
Thanks, I am actually curious - reading (some of) the link you provided gave me an idea of a bit of the argument for taking in all claimants from Afghanistan, but I'm not really sold on all of them, and felt like I was reading something that was really pushing an agenda (and it might not even be a bad agenda, but I like to start as unbias as possible).
Nothing wrong with that, looking at the sourced reports etc. is always a good idea.
Zaraki_Kenpachi
Member
No, you're apparently struggling to read what you're quoting. Hint: it's not the people that were deemed too dangerous. Grossok looks like theres more details to be read...