The fuck?
Don't get hit?
The fuck?
So you're saying every comic is consistent with what his power level is?
Yup.
Spartans are basically Captain America, but raised from childhood and augmented with far superior armor and weapons.
Dude would be toast.
That's because Chief's superpower is luck. Although I do recall his (and Blue team's) drop ship getting toasted during the Fall of Reach resulting in an unplanned mid-air drop for the team.
And auto-saves.
7 spartans vs. cap? Why would that even be a thing. What would happen is Cap would say "Avengers Assemble" and then Hulk and Thor would show up and liquify the lot of them.
nope.
Don't get hit?
Yes, experience leans heavily in Master Chief's favor.
He was trained from the age of five or six in the art of warfare. He first started seeing live combat in his mid-teens, after getting heavily surgically modified....His childhood and adolescence was spent learning tactics of war and almost nothing else. He would have been able to extensively study every single engagement that Captain America was apart of through his entire career, along with every other hero and every other military battle...ever until that point.
He was fighting the the best of the best of the Insurrectionists at the age of 14 in 2525. The Human/Covenant war started a few months later and Chief was actively fighting them for over thirty years through 2557 in Halo 4 and beyond. That's over 30 years of fighting with experience against a very wide range of opponents on dozens, perhaps hundreds, of different planets and space ships. Overall tactical experience, I would say, would lean in Chief's favor because he simply has been fighting longer against a wider range of enemies in far more varied environments.
It's hard to argue who would win thanks to whatever abilities they have depending on writer/type of story/whatever, but it is impossible to argue experience simply because Chief had basically been an expert in warfare and fighting since the age of ten. Over thirty years of desperately fighting against a vastly superior enemy will help someone grow as fighter to the point that comparing him to a guy who has only been fighting for 15-20 years and saying the latter has more tactical experience is a bit silly to say the least.
If Master Chief drank the special sauce, would he be better than Captain America? He wasn't a 90-pound sack of bones like Rogers was.
He'll have a real hard time covering that chest with his shieldHow could MC, or anyone for that matter go against this swole as fuck mothercucker?
![]()
So i figured I'd chime in just because,
anyway i thought i may as well list MC's abilities, since i prefer MC over Captain America and i know more about MC(only seen the first movie for CA)
You gotta be craze to bring up Cap cracking a nut on Hulk. Clearly the writer/executives were on drugs/money grabbing sobs.
Hulk farts and Cap would meet Thor bathing in the suns of cosmic Valhalla.
this guy? jeeezussYeah I debate using 616 Cap, he is all that needed. Could go scorched earth with Mutant X Cap, though
this guy? jeeezuss
![]()
The ridiculousness is mind boggling lol
Don't get hit?
What about prep time Cap? Unless one wants to make the argument that Cap is always prep time Cap.
My favorite part of the last Hulk movie was when Blonski started using Super Soldier moves on Hulk. Hulk couldn't touch him.I read the Hulk topic we had recently, and it is mentioned several times that has FTL reaction feats, and fights against people capable of dishing out far more damage than Cap is capable of. I'm not sure how Cap doing anything - besides dying - in a fight against Hulk could be attributed to anything more than Cap having one hell of a jobber aura.
Master Chief would kill Captain America and I say this as a fan as Captain America. All of the Spartans are relentless killing machines that look to kill as quickly as possible. If a Spartan touches you its looking to kill you. Captain America is way too nice in comparison.
Cap sparring with Thor?
![]()
Yeaaaah, no.
That still demonstrates the disparity quite well. Thanos actually has to break a sweat, and he does get beaten around by Thor on occasion.
Thanos was a goddamned monster in Infinity, and this was AFTER he pimp slapped the hulk into next week. The Avengers weren't even scratching that guy.
He best stop sending punks to Wakanda.
Where IS that time gem, anyway? Kind of weird that suddenly no one's really all that concerned about it.
Maybe it evolved and left, they do tend to do that.
![]()
At this point in the Marvel universe, isn't it fair to say that every hero can somehow beat every other hero?
All Master Chief has to do is throw a plasma grenade on Cap's leg.
Add in that John's training started when he was just 5 years old. I think Cap's only advantage is his shield.1940's Super Soldier "tech" vs 2525 tech, come on. If MC does not beat Cap it's a monument of human stagnation and failure.
1940's Super Soldier "tech" vs 2525 tech, come on. If MC does not beat Cap it's a monument of human stagnation and failure.
the world isnt the same, so its not technology stacking.
Are they just play fighting or something? If this thread is anything to go by, Cap should crush Wayne.
Watching that video in the OP I was able to guess it was fan vote without reading anything. Automatic Assault rifles may be shit for acute precision, but you're telling me not even a stray hit Cap on any parts that weren't guarded? Lol. Then MC pulling out the pistol once he throws Cap to his shield? Heh. Had he done that after Cap lost his shield, it would've been over. MC's gameplan would have to be to not let Cap in close, and if he decided to spam shield throw I could totally see MC doing something like this.
![]()
I like Cap, but I don't think he can beat MC. Screw Attack does these better, I don't think they have fan vote. Which made the Spider-Man vs Batman one all the more sweeter, lol.
Good point. But (and I need a comic fan here to confirm) isn't Captain America the peak of human perfection? If so, I'd think Master Chief has the edge. What was done to Master Chief made him beyond a human. Bones as strong as steel, and such.the world isnt the same, so its not technology stacking.
Good point. But (and I need a comic fan here to confirm) isn't Captain America the peak of human perfection? If so, I'd think Master Chief has the edge. What was done to Master Chief made him beyond a human. Bones as strong as steel, and such.
It'd still be crazy that one world's 1940 would be better tech-wise than 2525, but it is still a valid point. I still think Master Chief, for the record.Ok, now I'm extremely confused. Are you guys saying that 1940's tech is better than 2525 tech?
I mean, I can accept that we can't compare 2525 tech to 2525 tech from different worlds, but how can WWII tech be better than planet-busting-FTL-warp-drive-genetic-modification tech?
Good point. But (and I need a comic fan here to confirm) isn't Captain America the peak of human perfection? If so, I'd think Master Chief has the edge. What was done to Master Chief made him beyond a human. Bones as strong as steel, and such.
Good point. But (and I need a comic fan here to confirm) isn't Captain America the peak of human perfection? If so, I'd think Master Chief has the edge. What was done to Master Chief made him beyond a human. Bones as strong as steel, and such.
Ok, now I'm extremely confused. Are you guys saying that 1940's tech is better than 2525 tech?
I mean, I can accept that we can't compare 2525 tech to 2525 tech from different worlds, but how can WWII tech be better than planet-busting-FTL-warp-drive-genetic-modification tech?
If it comes down to H2H (that is, MC runs out of ammo), Rogers has a pretty big advantage.