• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Citizen Vigilante

d7flcqCOeJK4lrwc2HrFb3eH1hl-683x1024.jpg
 
This is the film that is controversial because it's too "far-right"?

I glanced at a reddit thread and saw responses such as;

"Are you really this surprised the people who were "don't shove it in our faces" are out here shoving THEIR shit in your face? Lol. "

"Those youtubers spent 10 years screaming that all politics (rightwing and leftwing) should be kept out of movies and tv shows. Yet here they are glazing a very one-sided political film that makes it seem as if only men of colour harm women"

"It's a political film. The film ends with the hero giving a speech in which he says he'll "keep going until the radical woke left stops destroying democracy." If you like that, it says a lot about your political worldview."

"it is literally an explicit call to violence against migrants, like actually, genuinely the film is imploring the audience to commit violence against migrants. Genuine neo-Nazi shit, fuck Boll so hard."

 
i can see google and RT reworking algos just cause this movie. critics were mostly trying to give this the silent treatment but seems like they'll be forced to review this just so they can give it a 1 star review to tank the aggregate and also they're self interest for clicks.
 
i can see google and RT reworking algos just cause this movie. critics were mostly trying to give this the silent treatment but seems like they'll be forced to review this just so they can give it a 1 star review to tank the aggregate and also they're self interest for clicks.
Well also 1 star because it is made by Uwe Boll and so almost definitely shit.
 
This is the film that is controversial because it's too "far-right"?

I glanced at a reddit thread and saw responses such as;

"Are you really this surprised the people who were "don't shove it in our faces" are out here shoving THEIR shit in your face? Lol. "

"Those youtubers spent 10 years screaming that all politics (rightwing and leftwing) should be kept out of movies and tv shows. Yet here they are glazing a very one-sided political film that makes it seem as if only men of colour harm women"

"It's a political film. The film ends with the hero giving a speech in which he says he'll "keep going until the radical woke left stops destroying democracy." If you like that, it says a lot about your political worldview."

"it is literally an explicit call to violence against migrants, like actually, genuinely the film is imploring the audience to commit violence against migrants. Genuine neo-Nazi shit, fuck Boll so hard."


Reddit is full of idiots. It's about people who rape and kill and get off Scott free.
 
I rented it. My impressions:

I watched it. It's not a very well made film, no surprise given the director, but vaguely watchable. There's an extended sex scene between Armie Hammer and an ugly hooker for no apparent reason, maybe to embarrass him. Whole film is edited like a cracked out music video and storytelling is done in clumsy non-linear fashion. Not great.

As far as the subject matter, I'm not sure why this is any different from a Dirty Harry or Death Wish movie or any of a thousand b movies about vigilante justice. Just in this case the message is directed toward the failed European governments and justice systems. Censoring it is pathetic and proves its point.

It's not a very good movie, but it may be cathartic to some Europeans in the same way that Death Wish was to New Yorkers at the time. Nowhere near that level of filmmaking competence though
 
The judge acting looked like it was well aware of being in a uwe boll movie...

I cant be the only one who thought the whole monologue was more stilt, on the nose and badly acted than some amateur EA story modes cutscenes...right?
 
I watched some of it and it is an uwe boll movie through and through.
I won't talk about the politics of it but artistically it is pure boll trash.
The dude knows how to make a movie on a technical standpoint, has decent budget (when filming in eastern europe like he did), but has no eye, style or creativity.

It is a hard watch and reminds you why Uwe Boll is considered the worst director on earth, but at the same time also a dude who work like mad to do what he loves, which is writing and directing movies, all this without an ounce of talent. I couldn't do half of what he achieved and im sure im better at film making than him, since anyone with two eyes and a brain is better at film making than him.
 
Last edited:
I was just thinking of the Dungeon Siege movie he did which had an amazing cast but was such a terrible film.
He's not as bad as those days where he earned the worst director of all time badge on IMDb. Steady improvement from rock bottom to around 3/10 over the past 20 years. He's wiling to tackle subversive and transgressive subject matter which can make his work stand out a bit, as we see here.
 
IIRC Uwe was using german tax credits to basically make movies "for free", so they may harbor some resentment towards him as well. I'll have to try to watch this.
 
He's not as bad as those days where he earned the worst director of all time badge on IMDb. Steady improvement from rock bottom to around 3/10 over the past 20 years. He's wiling to tackle subversive and transgressive subject matter which can make his work stand out a bit, as we see here.
He kind of still is tho.
His shot composition is abysmal, he still has 2000s music video director quirks that look very dated. Just look at the migrant knife attack from the beginning it is awfully shot and edited, plus the blood looks like 2010 cgi...
Only redeeming artistic aspect of the movie is that he stole the A24 "gloomy realistic" photography so the image looks decent.

You are right on his willingness (need ?) to tackle transgressive subject tho.
 
Last edited:
He kind of still is tho.
His shot composition is abysmal, he still has 2000s music video director quirks that look very dated. Just look at the migrant knife attack from the beginning it is awfully shot and edited, plus the blood looks like 2010 cgi...
Only redeeming artistic aspect of the movie is that he stole the A24 "gloomy realistic" photography so the image looks decent.
House of the Dead, In the Name of the King, and Bloodrayne are physically painful to watch
 
I'm in a mood for a new Bruce Willis Death Wish.

I'll watch it.
With Bruce Willis? Sadly, that's likely soon to be a documentary with his failing health :(

I feel like the vigilante film has been run pretty much to the ground, though the DW angle of "just an ordinary guy pushed to his limits" versus the "retired assassin/specops/cop forced back into action" aspect is the key to it.

I feel like folks have lost so much hope in the justice system to deliver actual justice that a vigilante film is either just too uncomfortable a suggestion or to attractive a proposition to be just entertainment. I have only vague memories of the Kevin Bacon version (Death Sentence). But it would likely be a strong call to arms if done well because there is really no other option at this point barring a massive flush of judges, prosecutors, and police officials (not the beat cops).
 
He's not as bad as those days where he earned the worst director of all time badge on IMDb. Steady improvement from rock bottom to around 3/10 over the past 20 years. He's wiling to tackle subversive and transgressive subject matter which can make his work stand out a bit, as we see here.

Boll's not good but I think the "worst director ever" is just ridiculous. The label has only really stuck because for a trash-film director his skill with abusing German tax credits allowed him to get access to IP's and casts that realistically he shouldn't have.
His better regarded stuff tends to be his least known, and surprisingly quite a lot of his output has been topical/political.

As a trash-film afficionado I actually admire him for his ability to genuinely piss people off, and I thought him boxing (i.e, beating the shit out of) his critics was hilarious,
 
I thought the world population already had a reunion and a debate to chose the last jedi director as the worse who ever lived...

At least Boll never killed any residual interest i had in a beloved childhood brand...
 
Boll's not good but I think the "worst director ever" is just ridiculous. The label has only really stuck because for a trash-film director his skill with abusing German tax credits allowed him to get access to IP's and casts that realistically he shouldn't have.
His better regarded stuff tends to be his least known, and surprisingly quite a lot of his output has been topical/political.

As a trash-film afficionado I actually admire him for his ability to genuinely piss people off, and I thought him boxing (i.e, beating the shit out of) his critics was hilarious,
That combination of having a real budget and famous actors back in the German tax credit days, but not the equivalent basic competence as a filmmaker, really stood out. Of course he wasn't the worst of all time but yeah, a special sort of bad. That being said I did watch most of his movies back then out of curiosity.
 
First five minutes, and last fifteen are based as fuck

Everything else is utter gash. And why the brothel scene? :messenger_tears_of_joy:

And I haven't heard dialogue delivered that brilliant since the first Resident evil.

But, I like the message 🤷‍♂️

Something's got to give. There's only so much rape and killing you can take..

There was zero chance of this getting made by Hollyweird.
 
With Bruce Willis? Sadly, that's likely soon to be a documentary with his failing health :(

It's one of the last films before the direct-to-video sequence where the disease took over. (2018 or 2019)
Just a mindless "fun" old school movie. The perfect kind of movie for streamings to produce instead of the hundreds of unfunny romantic comedies or bland spy movies they finance...

Anyways, i'll try to watch later.
 
I tried watching but only got 20 minutes in. It just ignores any of the ways of constructing a movie that we have developed over 100 years - like Uwe Boll has never seen a movie before and is confused on the basics on how to structure one - "should it have a start, middle and end? Maybe I should just make it all middle"
 
House of the Dead, In the Name of the King, and Bloodrayne are physically painful to watch
I legitimately think House of the Dead is one of the greatest bad movies ever made. It's like the worst filmmaker went out to make something with so much ambition, made all of the wrong decisions and somehow it all "works", much like Ed Wood, though Boll makes him look classier by comparison. The way it's filmed and edited is so over the top at times that I've come to love it (the scene when someone is dying and it randomly starts playing a montage of clips from earlier in the film always has me cracking up). Everything about that 10 minute shootout scene is trashy filmmaking heaven. Dude almost killed the actors when he filmed those 360 degree slo-mo shots. I can't wait for the sequel.
 
Ok, I finished the movie. I thought it was a the best movie he has ever made. It is very current issues. I found the ending satisfying. Judges and current politicians are the issue across the western the world. change the policies or lose everything.
 
Top Bottom