timetokill
Banned
Wish I could be in Hawaii! (never been)
Fight on Trojans
Fight on Trojans
Bold! But I could see it happening. So who would you guess in the title game with them?I Push Fat Kids said:Conference winners:
Pac 10 - Oregon
ACC - North Carolina
Big XII - Texas
SEX - Auburn
Big X - OSU
Big East - Pitt
I Push Fat Kids said:Going to the Oregon vs. USC game this year - anything I should know?
Er... how?Pimpwerx said:SEC will outperform preseason predictions.
Man, I hope you're right. But I lack faith.Notre Dame will suck.
So...is Alabama going to play Florida in the national title game or something?Pimpwerx said:SEC will outperform preseason predictions.
KingGondo said:pic[IMG]
Also, our players have been doing ORANGE STEROIDS. GET SOME!!!![/QUOTE]
gatorade, is it in you?
KingGondo said:Excited for OSU's new offense (we're gonna be the new Texas Tech/Houston), but afraid it will take 'til next year to gel.
Kendall Hunter will have a HUGE year though, I would be shocked if he's not 1st Team All-Big Twexas.
And guess what, FSU? YOU GOT COMPANY.WHEN IT COMES TO SHIRTLESS PICS OF PLAYERS
![]()
Also, our players have been doing ORANGE STEROIDS. GET SOME!!!!
Well, some of them.impirius said:Only four more days until I'm tailgating and watching the Gamecocks play!
Hey, we dovetailed there.timetokill said:End 10-3, 3rd in conference
Cyan said:Well, some of them.![]()
I Push Fat Kids said:They play Boise St. in a week or two as well. So much for the Pac 10's image :lol
I Push Fat Kids said:Going to the Oregon vs. USC game this year - anything I should know?
giga said:CAN WE GET SOME ZOMBIE NATION UP IN THIS BITCH
timetokill said:Okay, season predictions time then?
USC Trojans
---------------
September
9/2 @ Hawaii -- W
9/11 Virginia -- W
9/18 @ Minnesota -- W
9/25 @ Wash St -- W
October
10/2 Washington -- L (Locker tears apart our shaky/thin secondary)
10/9 @ Stanford -- W (I think without Gerhart, Luck gets hit/shaken by DL blitzes)
10/16 California -- W (Bears just can't seem to beat us, and we're at home)
10/30 Oregon -- L (I think injuries have hit the defense too hard to deal with the Ducks offense by this point, and fans look to next two games as "recovery games")
November
10/6 Arizona State -- W
10/13 @ Arizona -- W
10/20 @ Oregon St -- L (we can't win in the state of Oregon, and Oregon State is usually a menace at this point in the year)
10/27 Notre Dame -- W (9 straight baby!)
December
10/4 @ UCLA -- W (Fucla, and their lack of offensive line + who? Prince? but I repeat myself)
Flip flop the UW and Stanford games and I think we agree. UW hasn't won in the coliseum in a long time (they did come close with a mobile QB one year but that was under Pete). As much as I want to beat Stanford I think Harbaugh is in our head.
End 10-3, 3rd in conference
Cyan said:Hey, we dovetailed there.
timetokill said:Heh, nice -- who do you have #1 and #2?
I Push Fat Kids said:Going to the Oregon vs. USC game this year - anything I should know?
bluemax said:Looks like according to Cyan it will be:
Zona
Oregon St
USC
Oregon
Cal
?
?
?
?
?
I just can't see Zona that high.
Cyan said:Bold! But I could see it happening. So who would you guess in the title game with them?
Yeah, I can see why you say that. They did lose both coordinators, and they've got that weird dual setup, and all (plus losses on D). But their offense is experienced and talented enough that I don't expect much of a dropoff, and Stoops has always fielded a decent D. Plus the schedule is extremely favorable, probably the best in the Pac-10.bluemax said:Looks like according to Cyan it will be:
Zona
Oregon St
USC
Oregon
Cal
?
?
?
?
?
I just can't see Zona that high.
You still have Alliotti, right? Hmm...I Push Fat Kids said:1. Oregon - I'm a homer but I actually LOVE our defense this year. Call me crazy but I think they're going to carry this team. Spanish for The Michael is going to have a great year but I believe our D is going to surprise people.
impirius said:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Only four more days until I'm tailgating and watching the Gamecocks play!
How would you structure it if it's on the board?timetokill said:Do we have a Pick 'Em sort of thing going this year? I wouldn't mind running one. Ideally I'd like to keep it here on the boards instead of elsewhere (Yahoo, etc.) because I think it'd keep more interest and have people less likely to forget.
Cyan said:You still have Alliotti, right? Hmm...
Cyan said:How would you structure it if it's on the board?
Go by the top 25 or top 15 and do it by confidence points. The one your most sure of worth the most points and go down from there.timetokill said:I'd probably keep it simple, something like a selection of 10 interesting games where people just pick the winner, 1 point for each game, maybe a bonus game where you have to predict the score for a bonus 3 points for the person who gets closest that week, that kind of thing.
I'd just have the list in your thread (if you're cool with it) and just go through the thread the day before the first games and record the predictions, post results in the next week's thread, etc.
Shick Brithouse said:Go by the top 25 or top 15 and do it by confidence points. The one your most sure of worth the most points and go down from there.
Example, take the top 15 in the polls and say you know that the #1 team will win and you're mist sure about that pick, so its worth 15 points. Your next pick is worth 14 points etc. Then the person running the pool will take a game at random and everybody will call however many points they think will be scored in that game. Make that like a 25 point bonus for whoever is closest without going over.
timetokill said:Yeah, I've seen that system around (and played pick 'ems with it) and wouldn't mind doing it but I mostly didn't want to clutter the thread or confuse people who weren't familiar with it (though I guess many in here would be).
It also seems like something like that would really warrant its own thread. Which again, I'm willing to do, just wasn't sure if we wanted to really do that.
I'd be down with that. I agree that it needs to be its own thread, maybe 1 thread all season. You should make a thread and gauge interest. I'd imagine many people would do it considering the bowl pools we have every year are pretty popular.timetokill said:Yeah, I've seen that system around (and played pick 'ems with it) and wouldn't mind doing it but I mostly didn't want to clutter the thread or confuse people who weren't familiar with it (though I guess many in here would be).
It also seems like something like that would really warrant its own thread. Which again, I'm willing to do, just wasn't sure if we wanted to really do that.
Hell yeah. If Pryor can keep the momentum and stay consistent, he could win the Heisman.bucknuticus said:This is the year!
![]()
bucknuticus said:ESPN fantasy has something like this, we could create a group on there.
timetokill said:We could, I just figured (as I mentioned to Cyan) that it would probably maintain interest and activity better if it was actually on GAF and not on a third-party site.
That said I am still not sold on doing the points thing as opposed to a more simplified method. Of course if most would prefer a confidence system then I'd be fine with doing that.
AlteredBeast said:Let's do AP top 25 and have the winner of each week be in charge of the next weeks thread with the overall winner (either by total wins or best percentage) makes the offseason thread.
Just throwing ideas out there
bucknuticus said:I dont think we'll need confidence, as there is so many games in the season, seems unnecessary. In the bowl season it makes sense since there are only about 30 games.
I'd rather have Cyan do the weekly threads, and doesn't the winner of bowl pick'em make the off season thread?AlteredBeast said:Let's do AP top 25 and have the winner of each week be in charge of the next weeks thread with the overall winner (either by total wins or best percentage) makes the offseason thread.
Just throwing ideas out there
That kids supposed to be way ahead of where Pryor was at the same time. And he has a better arm and is more accurate.bucknuticus said:Also if you turn on ESPNU you can see the future of OSU football playing QB for Huber Heights, Braxton Miller, kid is beasting right now.