TheDinoman
Member
I never liked Banjo & Kazooie's redesigns in Nuts & Bolts, but oooh boy, I think I have a new-found appreciation for them now after seeing this mess.
He's an fbi informant. How did you not know?I liked the paperclip guy but he asked too many questions.
Wow! Conker got DmCed.
Just looking at these two pictures side by side instills a sensation of pure darkness inside my soul.
![]()
![]()
He looks like he could be an incidental or side character in a Conker game but he looks nothing like Conker himself other than colors. I feel like you could show people a picture of Conker and say "draw him but younger" and not a single person would make this. You usually try to keep defining characteristics when aging a character up or down, like oh say the entire shape of their head and face.
They already ruined most of Rare ips as soon they release new games of said ips(exception being ki). This one is next...shame..
Young Conker's eyes are offset from his face. It reminds me of Kermit the Frog.
Seriously, why do his eyes look like that?
alrighty thenFuck the people that developed this.
They should have done something like this:
Granted I don't know how old Conker is supposed to be or what age Young Conker is meant to be either, I may have aged him down too far... but at least it resembles the character it's supposed to be a younger version of IMO.
Yeah he looks like a frog. It's terrible.
Look at how Pixar aged down Sully, Mike, and Randall in Monster's University for an example of how to do this properly. Or maybe even like, any other "young" version of a preexisting character ever.
Even young Joanna Dark (both versions) didn't look this stupid. Aside from the neck tattoo they both at least looked like younger, more lively versions of the Joanna in Perfect Dark.
Edit: Even Rare's own version of Young Conker without the stupid space suit doesn't look like a young Conker:
Except he isn't famous. Now, if it were Mario or Sonic it would have actually made some sense. The only people who know Conker are traditional gamers.
They could have used the Project Spark model for the tech demo though, as Chris Seavor thought was the case. This thing is a bastardized Conker so I get why fans are pissed.
You're loving this. Wow you're a prince, huh?
A character that hasn't got a new game in 15 years after the sequel was cancelled following Microsoft's acquisition of RARE in 2002,releasing a not so great remake of Bad Fur Day on Xbox,expecting fans to build their own Conker game in Project Spark instead of doing it themselves,cancelling Conker's Big Reunion episodic content for Project Spark,and now this bastardization of the original character design of Conker.
So yes fans are mad that Microsoft seemingly has been the whole reason why nothing good has come out of the IP in 15 years.
Try focusing on the bigger picture. It's not always what you see.
No it does not, that drawing post up above does a better job. What rare did was make him look like a frog. He's not a frog.What do you mean? Rare's version looks more like a young Conker to me.
I mean, it's still not great, but it's a bit better.
I made this video just for this thread. Feel free to share it or don't, doesn't matter to me. I just love how much the announcement and this thread made me laugh. Enjoy:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rme3VtGH5S0
If people stop hating, and freaking out for no reason and actually watch the video and listen to what they are saying. It will be lot clearer.
At no point during the video, they implied Conker franchise is back, this is for gamer, this is what we thought you guys wanted. So people seriously need to get over the fact that their dreams are some how crushed because they were expecting something that was never promised.
Second thing, the entire video they are talking about an animated object (Conker) how its interacting with the surrounding (furniture, wall etc.).
Seems to me that the whole purpose of this was to show developers what they can do, API's they can use and how its actually possible to create a little animated object that would interacts with the surrounding.
They should have done something like this:
![]()
Granted I don't know how old Conker is supposed to be or what age Young Conker is meant to be either, I may have aged him down too far... but at least it resembles the character it's supposed to be a younger version of IMO.
Conker ever only worked if you were a 12 year old convinced you're too cool for the N64 you got for your 8th birthday. I hope this is completely different from the original, because if it's at all like the original it will be embarrassingly awful.
Just looking at these two pictures side by side instills a sensation of pure darkness inside my soul.
![]()
![]()
No it does not, that drawing post up above does a better job. What rare did was make him look like a frog. He's not a frog.
These IDIOTS making this clearly don't understand the BRILLIANCE and HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE of the original MASTERWORK that was a swearing squirrel in a kind ok N64 game and a total shit GBC game!!!
UNFORGIVABLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
They should have done something like this:
Granted I don't know how old Conker is supposed to be or what age Young Conker is meant to be either, I may have aged him down too far... but at least it resembles the character it's supposed to be a younger version of IMO.
I don't get it.
Is that supposed to be post lobotomy Conker?
These IDIOTS making this clearly don't understand the BRILLIANCE and HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE of the original MASTERWORK that was a swearing squirrel in a kinda ok N64 game and a total shit GBC game!!!
UNFORGIVABLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
If people stop hating, and freaking out for no reason and actually watch the video and listen to what they are saying. It will be lot clearer.
At no point during the video, they implied Conker franchise is back, this is for gamer, this is what we thought you guys wanted. So people seriously need to get over the fact that their dreams are some how crushed because they were expecting something that was never promised.
These IDIOTS making this clearly don't understand the BRILLIANCE and HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE of the original MASTERWORK that was a swearing squirrel in a kinda ok N64 game and a total shit GBC game!!!
UNFORGIVABLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Literally the first thing they say in the video is how beloved Conker is, how they know he has a huge following, and how they worked with Rare. Why even say that stuff if they didn't expect fans to take note of this?
"Conker has a huge following so let's make something that literally no fan is really interested in". They know us so well.
Conker himself actually didn't swear that much in BFD at all, actually. The only times he did were when he was quoting some movie line (IE "Get away from her, you bitch!")
Literally the first thing they say in the video is how beloved Conker is, how they know he has a huge following, and how they worked with Rare. Why even say that stuff if they didn't expect fans to take note of this?
Go back to the whole you came from. You have no idea what's this about especially after mentioning the unknown and trash GBC game that hade nothing to do with the 64 version. Also this is not the first time or last time Microsoft, slaps the conker IP around like a abused child. They keep kicking the property and rare was gutted for their own needs... I hope Chris S says no next time.