• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Conker is BACK: Young Conker reveal video

I never liked Banjo & Kazooie's redesigns in Nuts & Bolts, but oooh boy, I think I have a new-found appreciation for them now after seeing this mess.
 
Just looking at these two pictures side by side instills a sensation of pure darkness inside my soul.

conker.jpg

Screen_Shot_2016-02-29_at_9.13.20_AM__2_.0.png

He looks like he could be an incidental or side character in a Conker game but he looks nothing like Conker himself other than colors. I feel like you could show people a picture of Conker and say "draw him but younger" and not a single person would make this. You usually try to keep defining characteristics when aging a character up or down, like oh say the entire shape of their head and face.
 
There's surely a technical reason why they made a redesign that looks this God awful, right? Project spark conker at least LOOKED like Conker. I'm disappointed no one pulled that designer to the side and simply said, NO.
 
He looks like he could be an incidental or side character in a Conker game but he looks nothing like Conker himself other than colors. I feel like you could show people a picture of Conker and say "draw him but younger" and not a single person would make this. You usually try to keep defining characteristics when aging a character up or down, like oh say the entire shape of their head and face.

Young Conker's eyes are offset from his face. It reminds me of Kermit the Frog.

Seriously, why do his eyes look like that?
 
They already ruined most of Rare ips as soon they release new games of said ips(exception being ki). This one is next...shame..

Well, technically, this is only a tech demo for Hololens dev kits. We have yet to see them actually make a new Conker game.

And no, Live & Reloaded doesn't count.
 
Young Conker's eyes are offset from his face. It reminds me of Kermit the Frog.

Seriously, why do his eyes look like that?

Yeah he looks like a frog. It's terrible.

Look at how Pixar aged down Sully, Mike, and Randall in Monster's University for an example of how to do this properly. Or maybe even like, any other "young" version of a preexisting character ever.

Even young Joanna Dark (both versions) didn't look this stupid. Aside from the neck tattoo they both at least looked like younger, more lively versions of the Joanna in Perfect Dark.

Edit: Even Rare's own version of Young Conker without the stupid space suit doesn't look like a young Conker:

 
They should have done something like this:


Granted I don't know how old Conker is supposed to be or what age Young Conker is meant to be either, I may have aged him down too far... but at least it resembles the character it's supposed to be a younger version of IMO.
 
They should have done something like this:



Granted I don't know how old Conker is supposed to be or what age Young Conker is meant to be either, I may have aged him down too far... but at least it resembles the character it's supposed to be a younger version of IMO.

We already know what a "Young Conker" would look like, though. Take a look at Diddy Kong Racing, Conker Pocket Tales or footage of Twelve Tales Conker 64 (before it was transformed into Bad Fur Day).

Also, if BFD's box is to be believed, Conker is 21.

2506_back.jpg
 
Yeah he looks like a frog. It's terrible.

Look at how Pixar aged down Sully, Mike, and Randall in Monster's University for an example of how to do this properly. Or maybe even like, any other "young" version of a preexisting character ever.

Even young Joanna Dark (both versions) didn't look this stupid. Aside from the neck tattoo they both at least looked like younger, more lively versions of the Joanna in Perfect Dark.

Edit: Even Rare's own version of Young Conker without the stupid space suit doesn't look like a young Conker:

What do you mean? Rare's version looks more like a young Conker to me.

I mean, it's still not great, but it's a bit better.
 
Except he isn't famous. Now, if it were Mario or Sonic it would have actually made some sense. The only people who know Conker are traditional gamers.

They could have used the Project Spark model for the tech demo though, as Chris Seavor thought was the case. This thing is a bastardized Conker so I get why fans are pissed.

You're loving this. Wow you're a prince, huh?

A character that hasn't got a new game in 15 years after the sequel was cancelled following Microsoft's acquisition of RARE in 2002,releasing a not so great remake of Bad Fur Day on Xbox,expecting fans to build their own Conker game in Project Spark instead of doing it themselves,cancelling Conker's Big Reunion episodic content for Project Spark,and now this bastardization of the original character design of Conker.

So yes fans are mad that Microsoft seemingly has been the whole reason why nothing good has come out of the IP in 15 years.

Try focusing on the bigger picture. It's not always what you see.

If people stop hating, and freaking out for no reason and actually watch the video and listen to what they are saying. It will be lot clearer.

At no point during the video, they implied Conker franchise is back, this is for gamer, this is what we thought you guys wanted. So people seriously need to get over the fact that their dreams are some how crushed because they were expecting something that was never promised.

Second thing, the entire video they are talking about an animated object (Conker) how its interacting with the surrounding (furniture, wall etc.).

Seems to me that the whole purpose of this was to show developers what they can do, API's they can use and how its actually possible to create a little animated object that would interacts with the surrounding.
 
If people stop hating, and freaking out for no reason and actually watch the video and listen to what they are saying. It will be lot clearer.

At no point during the video, they implied Conker franchise is back, this is for gamer, this is what we thought you guys wanted. So people seriously need to get over the fact that their dreams are some how crushed because they were expecting something that was never promised.

Second thing, the entire video they are talking about an animated object (Conker) how its interacting with the surrounding (furniture, wall etc.).

Seems to me that the whole purpose of this was to show developers what they can do, API's they can use and how its actually possible to create a little animated object that would interacts with the surrounding.

How about they make up a lame character to (torture) showcase rather then drag a known character through the dirt? why conker? to fuck with people maybe.
 
These IDIOTS making this clearly don't understand the BRILLIANCE and HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE of the original MASTERWORK that was a swearing squirrel in a kinda ok N64 game and a total shit GBC game!!!

UNFORGIVABLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Do they even have anything resembling artists over there? One of the worst looking character models for a cartoon character in ages.

They should have done something like this:

tJey7EL.png


Granted I don't know how old Conker is supposed to be or what age Young Conker is meant to be either, I may have aged him down too far... but at least it resembles the character it's supposed to be a younger version of IMO.

Wow, that is actual great design.
 
Conker ever only worked if you were a 12 year old convinced you're too cool for the N64 you got for your 8th birthday. I hope this is completely different from the original, because if it's at all like the original it will be embarrassingly awful.

giphy.gif


I just can't comprehend the logic behind this. If you were around back then for Conker, you're definitely too old to see the appeal of this design. Hell, even for 2005.
 
Just looking at these two pictures side by side instills a sensation of pure darkness inside my soul.

conker.jpg

Screen_Shot_2016-02-29_at_9.13.20_AM__2_.0.png

Artist say that the more lines you add to a character's face, the older that character looks.

This Young Conker looks like he's seen some shit in his time.
 
No it does not, that drawing post up above does a better job. What rare did was make him look like a frog. He's not a frog.

Like I said, it's not all that great, but it's at least better than the actual Young Conker version. Only slightly.

These IDIOTS making this clearly don't understand the BRILLIANCE and HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE of the original MASTERWORK that was a swearing squirrel in a kind ok N64 game and a total shit GBC game!!!

UNFORGIVABLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I think you've just missed the whole point.
 
They should have done something like this:



Granted I don't know how old Conker is supposed to be or what age Young Conker is meant to be either, I may have aged him down too far... but at least it resembles the character it's supposed to be a younger version of IMO.

Please do more. This is good stuff. Give him a gold tooth and sunglasses. Remember that L&R live action promo? Conker was a rapper back in the day.
 
I wish people would discuss more the technology behind this instead of Conker's (clearly awful, yes) design. After all, it is a friggin tech demo, they might as well have used Donald Trump in a speedo, it's the proof of concept that matters. If they went ahead and made a fully fledged Conker's sequel using this little demon's spawn, then yeah, that'd be a big deal.
 
1275389857_naked-gun-facepalm.gif


What was Microsoft even thinking with this? Who is this supposed to appeal to? Using Conker for your innocent HoloLens game, a mascot based on crude humor, is mind boggling. And I think we've said enough about his "design".
 
They really need help. They keep developing/ betting on the wrong things. Kinect v2, tv, Windows 10 App Store, Hololens, Young Conker, Xbox One specs, just stop it Microsoft!
 
These IDIOTS making this clearly don't understand the BRILLIANCE and HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE of the original MASTERWORK that was a swearing squirrel in a kinda ok N64 game and a total shit GBC game!!!

UNFORGIVABLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Go back to the whole you came from. You have no idea what's this about especially after mentioning the unknown and trash GBC game that hade nothing to do with the 64 version. Also this is not the first time or last time Microsoft, slaps the conker IP around like a abused child. They keep kicking the property and rare was gutted for their own needs... I hope Chris S says no next time.
 
This isn't just a bad design for Conker. It's a bad design full stop. I think if someone purposefully went out of their way to re-design Conker in a terrible way for laughs, it still wouldn't be this bad. The existence of this defies logic.
 
If people stop hating, and freaking out for no reason and actually watch the video and listen to what they are saying. It will be lot clearer.

At no point during the video, they implied Conker franchise is back, this is for gamer, this is what we thought you guys wanted. So people seriously need to get over the fact that their dreams are some how crushed because they were expecting something that was never promised.

Literally the first thing they say in the video is how beloved Conker is, how they know he has a huge following, and how they worked with Rare. Why even say that stuff if they didn't expect fans to take note of this?

These IDIOTS making this clearly don't understand the BRILLIANCE and HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE of the original MASTERWORK that was a swearing squirrel in a kinda ok N64 game and a total shit GBC game!!!

UNFORGIVABLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I really don't think it's too much to ask that a cult classic character like Conker be treated with a little respect instead of having his corpse dragged out and reanimated for dumb shit like this.
 
Literally the first thing they say in the video is how beloved Conker is, how they know he has a huge following, and how they worked with Rare. Why even say that stuff if they didn't expect fans to take note of this?

They knew exactly what they were doing, i want to see the other design's for young conker that they paston. I mean we know what a squirrel looks like? yes? developers.
 
Conker himself actually didn't swear that much in BFD at all, actually. The only times he did were when he was quoting some movie line (IE "Get away from her, you bitch!")
 
Conker himself actually didn't swear that much in BFD at all, actually. The only times he did were when he was quoting some movie line (IE "Get away from her, you bitch!")

The only one I can think of that's not a movie quote is "Big boner? My ass!"

I even seem to recall the manual for Live and Reloaded having a quip from Conker that went something like "My mother always told me to never drink, swear, or urinate in public... one out of three ain't bad!"
 
Go back to the whole you came from. You have no idea what's this about especially after mentioning the unknown and trash GBC game that hade nothing to do with the 64 version. Also this is not the first time or last time Microsoft, slaps the conker IP around like a abused child. They keep kicking the property and rare was gutted for their own needs... I hope Chris S says no next time.

Well, if they make an actual Conker sequel next time, then no, Chris shouldn't say no. Conker's voice wouldn't be the same without him.
 
Top Bottom