• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Conservative Teen Magazine

Status
Not open for further replies.
SquiddyBiscuit said:
http://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:...nn_Jillette#Five_suggestions_to_Penn_Jillette


TXmOI.gif
Click to expand...


I like how they completely miss the point with the very first suggestion.
 
What the fuck do they put in issue two? It seems to me like this is just simply an idiotic way to sheft out the current plate of idiotic talking points to teens. Unfortunately for them, the only teems that will actually be swayed by this shit are ones that have already been indoctrinated, and not even all of them, since some of them will have an internet connection and an I.Q. over 80.
 
Michael Reagan:
In 1964 he graduated from the Judson School, a boarding school outside of Scottsdale, Arizona.[8] At his high school graduation, Ronald Reagan introduced himself to his son by saying, "My name is Ronald Reagan. What's yours?" He replied, "I'm your son Mike." "Oh," said Ronald Reagan. "I didn't recognize you."[8]
Click to expand...
 
Earthstrike said:
What the fuck do they put in issue two? It seems to me like this is just simply an idiotic way to sheft out the current plate of idiotic talking points to teens. Unfortunately for them, the only teems that will actually be swayed by this shit are ones that have already been indoctrinated, and not even all of them, since some of them will have an internet connection and an I.Q. over 80.
Click to expand...

I wonder if the general goal isn't to indoctrinate new recruits but try to keep the current conservative household kids from leaving the farm. They know they're losing the future, with the statistics on the younger generation and certain key issues.
 
I will never understand the current Republican infatuation with Ronald Reagan. Bush Sr would make more sense, but if you're going to keep writing puff pieces about a president from 30 years ago, at least go all the way back to Eisenhower. At least he remembered who he was at the end of his presidency. He was also more Republican than Reagan was. He'd be a freaking dream candidate for them right now with what he did.
 
The magazine is absurd, but holy fuck at Conservapedia.
Liberals currently use two clauses to try and expand their power: the Commerce Clause and the General Welfare Clause. The general welfare clause mentions "promoting the general welfare". This to a liberal means taxing the rich out of existence and redistributing that money.
Click to expand...
Barack Hussein Obama II also known by the alias Barry Soetoro during his time in Indonesia[1][2] (born August 4, 1961 in Kenya) was elected the 44th President of the United States and the controversial recipient of the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize. He is the first known homosexual to become president, and has appointed more homosexuals to positions of senior authority than any other president.
Click to expand...
Calente says that if Barack Obama is reelected the economy will further crumble, leading to mass homelessness, food riots and turning our cities into disaster zones where kidnapping and ransom are the biggest industries. Real Americans, fed up with big government may revolt, but it at that point it may be too late. Around the world the situation will be even worse, with the "blackest of plagues" running rampant.
Click to expand...
Also, I thought referring to Obama as Barack Hussein Obama at every chance stopped being in vogue in 2009.
 
That's what's so terrifying about these people, anything anybody does to satirize these people could just as easily be an actual policy stance or opinion. It's insane.
 
The magazine is absurd, but holy fuck at Conservapedia.
Click to expand...

One article I remember seeing on that site was the head dude, Andrew Schlafly, pointing out the anti-Christian, liberal bias in a news article about recent floods only using the word "flood" a couple of times instead of in every sentence because they didn't want to acknowledge the biblical flood. :<
 
Watch Da Birdie said:
One article I remember seeing on that site was the head dude, Andrew Schlafly, pointing out the anti-Christian, liberal bias in a news article about recent floods only using the word "flood" a couple of times instead of in every sentence because they didn't want to acknowledge the biblical flood. :<
Click to expand...

Oh geez.

I want a link.
 
Well, it's on some talk page...here's a transcript of it I saw on SA

I don't understand the mainpage flood headline? Floods, flood and flooding are mentioned several times in the linked article..? MaxFletcher 17:05, 8 September 2011 (EDT)

The story only used flood/floods/flooding 21 times, but was over 1000 words long. That works out to about 2% of the prose being dedicated to the biblical idea of the Flood. Two percent is not very much at all, and is an obvious case of obfuscation. BrentH 17:15, 8 September 2011 (EDT)

I'm sorry? How many times is the word supposed to be mentioned? Your answer is specious. MaxFletcher 17:21, 8 September 2011 (EDT)

I'm sorry, it's really the best I could do. Aschlafly obviously read the article, saw the number of times the term was used, and took issue with it. I can see no other reason why he would have brought the matter up unless it was because the word was not used often enough. BrentH 17:27, 8 September 2011 (EDT)

The word "flood" or "floods" is not used once as a standalone term in the entire article!--Andy Schlafly 17:28, 8 September 2011 (EDT)

Can you give me an example of how it should be used so I understand? MaxFletcher 17:30, 8 September 2011 (EDT)

It is so: "The Susquehanna River broke a flood record...." ""It's just unknowable at this point as to whether or not those flood walls in the city of Binghamton will hold." "6 feet above what is consider major flood stage." "Flood watches and warnings were in effect from Virginia to New England." "... as flood waters carried debris downriver." "A flood watch was in effect through Thursday afternoon" BrentH 17:34, 8 September 2011 (EDT)

Ummm, what do you mean? Those sentences appear in the article. MaxFletcher 17:38, 8 September 2011 (EDT)

That's why I transcribed them here. BrentH 17:38, 8 September 2011 (EDT)

So, the terms floods/floods is used in the article. MaxFletcher 17:40, 8 September 2011 (EDT)

But not very often, and not in a "standalone" way, I guess. BrentH 17:43, 8 September 2011 (EDT)

So what is a "standalone" way and how many times should the term be used? This is all very confusing. MaxFletcher 17:46, 8 September 2011 (EDT)

Standalone way: "There was a flood." It should be used in at least 50% of the sentences, or maybe repeated several times in a row after each paragraph. BrentH 17:48, 8 September 2011 (EDT)

So, for example - "There was a flood in New York. People were fleeing because there was a flood and, due to flooding, New York will be evacuated". That doesn't make any sense! MaxFletcher 17:53, 8 September 2011 (EDT)

Well of course they don't use the Biblical term 'flood'. We know from the Bible that there will never be another flood on a Biblical scale. Genesis 9:11. --QPR 17:42, 8 September 2011 (EDT)

When there it is dangerously cold, does a newspaper say "it's cold in Pennsylvania," or "it's cooling in Pennsylvania"? The former, of course. Similarly, the article should say "Floods ravage Pennsylvania," rather than trying to avoid that term.--Andy Schlafly 18:00, 8 September 2011 (EDT)

Many news outlets are doing just that though. MaxFletcher 18:04, 8 September 2011 (EDT)

Not a great example Andy. 'Cooling' in the context you use it is a present participle. 'Flooding' in the article is a noun. They're not comparable terms. --QPR 18:06, 8 September 2011 (EDT)

Max, in your list of links I did not see an American newspaper using the term "flood" as a standalone noun. QPR, no problem, how about "cooling hits Pennsylvania" - a headline no one would expect to see. Yet newspapers use that syntax to avoid using the noun "flood".--Andy Schlafly 19:39, 8 September 2011 (EDT)

Can you give me an example of a headline you think should be used? I am still confused. MaxFletcher 19:44, 8 September 2011 (EDT)

I already did: "Floods ravage Pennsylvania," rather than trying to avoid that standalone term "flood".--Andy Schlafly 19:53, 8 September 2011 (EDT)

Sorry, you did. I apologise. So "Pennsylvania experiencing severe flooding" or "Flooding continues in Pennsylvania" are not adequate? MaxFletcher 19:56, 8 September 2011 (EDT)

I tend to agree with User:QPR. I would hesitate to call the current situation in Pennsylvania a "flood" because, bad as it is, it is certainly not comparable to the biblical flood (obviously this is not the reason why the lamestream media don't use the term). Maybe one should spell the latter with a capital "F", then everybody could use the word "flood" for ordinary floods without problems. --FrederickT3 20:07, 8 September 2011 (EDT)

You don't understand. This is a problem with liberals in general, but the lamestream media seems to take special pleasure in it. What they're doing by avoiding the word "flood" is trying to turn people away from Christ. Liberals and the lamestream media are pawns of Satan. I thank God that Conservapedia hasn't been corrupted yet, and I commend Andy for his vigilance. Constant vigilance is the only way to keep from being taken by evil. Liberals and the lamestream media are pawns of Satan. --JefferyA 21:25, 8 September 2011 (EDT)

I agree. 21 times in a 1000 word article is nowhere near enough. The article should have read something like" "Floods leading to flooding in flood-ravaged Pennsylvania, which is experiencing floods because of the rain which is causing floods to flood out part of the flood-ravaged state. Flood flood floody-flood flood. Flooding." That way, people would be reminded of the religious stakes of the story. BrentH 21:29, 8 September 2011 (EDT)

You're being sarcastic, but the truth is that the lamestream media tries to draw people away from Christ, or do you deny that? --JefferyA 21:36, 8 September 2011 (EDT)

Iwas actually being serious. Flood. BrentH 21:38, 8 September 2011 (EDT)
Click to expand...
 
Read The Conservative Teen and learn how to hate everyone else and make your life a world of displeasure and frustration!

edit: ^^^^WOW, lol
 
What is wrong with this country?

Honestly it's like there's a huge, "I'm mentally challenged and you can too!" club and HALF THE FUCKING COUNTRY IS IN IT!
 
ronito said:
What is wrong with this country?

Honestly it's like there's a huge, "I'm mentally challenged and you can too!" club and HALF THE FUCKING COUNTRY IS IN IT!
Click to expand...

Tell me about it, I don't understand liberals either. :/
 
Watch Da Birdie said:
Well, it's on some talk page...here's a transcript of it I saw on SA
Click to expand...

I...

I can't believe that some of these people actually think this. Like, I understand there is actual, real, honest disagreements between conservatives and liberals, and there should be. But who in that right mind thinks THAT.

Luke_whining.jpg
 
that girl is wearing an awful lot of makeup. Someone should talk to her about that. She doesn't want to give the idea that she's a hussy or a harlot, that's for sure.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Strap in, Alien Earth renewed for S2 for more teen drama
2
53
813
poodaddy replied
It seems like the older I get, the more conservative I get. Is it because young people are the worst?
2
91
6K
StreetsofBeige replied
Jane Goodall, famed primatologist and conservationist, dies at 91
19
552
ForAcademicPurposes replied
‘Teen Titans’ Live-Action Movie a Go at DC Studios
News 
22
2K
bitbydeath replied
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (1990) back in theaters starting today 8/14 until 8/21 for the 35th anniversary
2
54
2K
Chuck Berry replied
Top Bottom