For some reason it seems like the theconservativeteen.com is now pointed at the SPCA? Google has cached some of the pages, like the full Table of Contents here, but neither the full digital link or the buy a copy link work. They've also cached the 'we didn't get enough subscriptions to do a real run of issue 1' page...
-
Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!
Conservative Teen Magazine
- Thread starter Devolution
- Start date
- Status
TAJ
Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.
The Golden Age.
echoshifting
Banned
You know that's the blogger and not the magazine, right?
Isn't White Heaven just earth?
By the end of it I starte pronouncing "flood" in my head wrong. Flood instead of flud
Ohhh
echoshifting
Banned
Oh man, now I want someone to photoshop the hell out of that cover
Why 16 is Old Enough p.27
PLUS: 4 Easy Remedies for Crabs p.24
They do. It's called every other lamestream magazine, dude!
The page was here: http://www.theconservativeteen.com/
The magazine was the hosted on the unfortunately named "longboys.net"
http://krtins.longboys.net/Winter-2011-TCT/index.html#/1/
I stumbled across this a couple of days ago, hilarious.
Looks down for the moment.
nincompoop
Banned
Do we know for a fact this is real? It's not like the onion or something?
echoshifting
Banned
It lines up with standard neocon talking points. In other words, we'll never know for sure.
the more fake it is the more real it is
CrunchyFrog
Member
This mag is weird propaganda sure. I've never understood the hate for the abstinence argument though. If you don't wanna have kids the most surefire way to do it is by not having sex. Not the world's fault you can't keep it in your pants.
Devolution
Member
The hate is when the right makes it the only education possible when it comes to sex, thus depriving teens of information about condoms and stds. People and teens are going to have sex, provide them with the proper information to keep them from getting pregnant and getting diseases.
Count Dookkake
Member
Because it doesn't work. Places with abstinence-only programs seem to have more pregnant teens.
rohlfinator
Member
Looks like the PC police got to this cartoonist too. He had to practically draw Reagan as a white guy just so people wouldn't cry racism.
K
kittens
Unconfirmed Member
Holy shit. Just saw the OP. That magazine is just oozing in racist bullshit.
Yup. Abstinence education often implies that bodies and sex are nasty and shameful, too. Sex negative, body hate bullshit.
This is the funniest thing to come out of Conservapedia:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn19303-emc2-not-on-conservapedia.html
ThisWreckage
Banned
It doesn't work. The will to have sex will always be present in teenagers. That's a want that can't be diminished. Expecting teens to use protection without prior education on the subject matter is begging for unwanted pregnancies.
speculawyer
Member
For fucks sake!
Civil Rights in the Reagan-Bush Years
President Reagan announced his 1980 candidacy in Neshoba County, Mississippi, voting to fight federal encroachment on states' rights--an obvious euphemism, in that context, for the Civil Rights Acts. True to his word, President Reagan vetoed the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1988, which required government contractors to address racial employment disparities in their hiring practices; Congress overrode his veto with a two-thirds majority. His successor, President George Bush, would struggle with, but ultimately choose to sign, the Civil Rights Act of 1991.
Reagan supported the Aparthed government
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constructive_engagement
He literally supported a racist anti-black government!
Flying_Phoenix
Banned
For fucks sake!
Civil Rights in the Reagan-Bush Years
President Reagan announced his 1980 candidacy in Neshoba County, Mississippi, voting to fight federal encroachment on states' rights--an obvious euphemism, in that context, for the Civil Rights Acts. True to his word, President Reagan vetoed the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1988, which required government contractors to address racial employment disparities in their hiring practices; Congress overrode his veto with a two-thirds majority. His successor, President George Bush, would struggle with, but ultimately choose to sign, the Civil Rights Act of 1991.
Reagan supported the Aparthed government
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constructive_engagement
He literally supported a racist anti-black government!
States rights!
I agree. Some people just have no self control.
MisterNugNug
Member
Sex Ed is really strange too. A great analogy; if Driver's Ed was taught like Sex Ed, we wouldn't have drivers. In Driver's Ed, you're actually driving; you're not spending weeks on end learning about the theory of combustion, what pistons are in relation to the engine, how axles work, etc. That's precisely what Sex Ed is. This how a penis works. Here's how a vagina works. That's it. Its really a biology course more than anything. I'm not arguing that students should be fucking in class, but topics should include a helluva lot more than how we operate biologically.
Fantastical
Death Prophet
How do we know this is real again?
speculawyer
Member
Wow. I just . . . wow. I looked around that Conservapedia a bit.
Man, they are just driving themselves off a cliff if they want to insist that "Conservative = deny basic science".
They go Godwin on evolution ON THEIR MAIN PAGE!
http://www.conservapedia.com/Main_PageWhy is evolution pushed by evolutionists?
America’s evolutionists: Hitler’s inspiration?
Hitler’s ‘master race’ children haunted by their past
Questions every creationist should ask evolutionists
Why is evolution pushed by evolutionists?
The evolutionary racist Adolf Hitler
The evolutionary racist Adolf Hitler wrote in his work Mein Kampf: "The stronger must dominate and not blend with the weaker, thus sacrificing his own greatness. Only the born weakling can view this as cruel, but he, after all, is only a weak and limited man; for if this law did not prevail, any conceivable higher development (Hoherentwicklung) of organic living beings would be unthinkable."[3] See: Question evolution! campaign and 15 questions for evolutionists and Evolution
Of course the irony is that their economic views are the most social Darwinistic as possible!
Is that they way they really want to go? You gotta be anti-science to be 'conservative'? Wow.
She's weird. But I don't think I could find anyone on the cover of Conservative Teen attractive.
Watch Da Birdie
I buy cakes for myself on my birthday it's not weird lots of people do it I bet
My favorite thing about Conservapedia is there's apparently a big movement on it to link obesity with atheism.
echoshifting
Banned
I'm in for the magazine, but I refuse to believe that Conservapedia thing is real.
airmangataosenai
Member
I know when I think of young people, I think of Michael Reagan.
Thunder Monkey
Banned
This is actually true.
But if we don't educate the dumbest among us they might do something harmful like have six uneducated kids... crap.
It's a case of Poe's Law in action - the editors are a mix of trolls and true believers. The content they produce is similar to the point where there's significant infighting.
Trigger Warning
Member
.
It's our God given right. If I'm not having sex how do i know I'm even alive? How do i even know?
Devolution
Member
Punch yourself in the dick. Does it hurt?
Black Mamba
Member
Mortrialus
Banned
In Conservapedia's defense, growing up the son of Phyllis Schlafly is going to screw you up as a person. Andrew Schlafly is a pretty terrible human being, though.
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Andrew_Schlafly#Female_inferiority
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Andrew_Schlafly#Female_inferiority
- Status