legacyzero
Banned
Yeah, seeing the PC version will be what's most telling. I seriously think they are saving a lot of this for the next/new gen platforms.
They advertised the game as better than it was on PS3 hardware. That's them lying. None of the reviews are reporting this, and are in fact calling us crazy along with half the replies in here. So what you're saying is you've never bought a game day one?
I remember seeing a lot of people complaining during the beta that it was too dark and had poor framerate.
So you're telling me if you knew they changed the lighting system beforehand, you would not have bought the game?
You're telling me you want a refund because the game doesn't look quite as pretty as it did in previews?
If that's what you're telling me, then tell me.
They'll have to give answers sooner or later. Then can do it now, with fans making 'punny' references to their games, or later when it's during some internet lawsuit.
They haven't said a word regarding it. And, frankly, that's disgusting. I personally have no problem with calling them out on their lies, and allowing them to deal with it. They've gotten far more courtesy than they deserve already.
Even if this happens, in fact, especially if this happens, we should be blowing FROM up even more. That would be Ouya levels of bullshit, to fund your later release with early sales from ignorant customers.Yeah, seeing the PC version will be what's most telling. I seriously think they are saving a lot of this for the next/new gen platforms.
Yeah but there were also people who liked the darkness who are now complaining that it is gone. Poor framerate is still there although I don't doubt that the game runs better now that it has been stripped from its lightning. It'd be pretty sad if it didn't.
Yeah, seeing the PC version will be what's most telling. I seriously think they are saving a lot of this for the next/new gen platforms.
Even if this happens, in fact, especially if this happens, we should be blowing FROM up even more. That would be Ouya levels of bullshit, to fund your later release with early sales from ignorant customers.
My biggest hope is that this thread and campaign makes them consider adding the lightning to the PC version.
If the PC version gets the lightning, there is our answer, they couldnt get it running on consoles, the end.
If the PC is missing it, then it was clearly just false advertising, no way around it.
Serious question, if the PC version comes out and it looks exactly like PS360 but with hi-res textures/resolution, how should we react? What do people think? I am thinking this is going to be the most likely scenario -- it will not have any of the stuff in the "preview"/vertical slice build.
No
But its crazy to me that people feel duped when every multiplatform game with a PC/Nextgen version has similar gaps.
Unfortunately there is the debate surrounding the BETA/Preview builds that have yet to be commented on by FROM or resolved and thats a shame.
It does seem clear that the Beta was more graphically intensive from the previous posts (but not by such a huge margin) but its also clear that the Beta had several issues with framerate and even the full game still has some.
I find it hard to believe that anyone feels surprised by this given the lead up to it. I suppose if you had a super clean playthrough of the Beta it might stick out to you more but that wasn't universally the case by a long shot
So is this the sentiment shared by everyone in support of this?
This comment in particular I mean. Have they gotten far more courtesy than they deserve?
Now it's time to buckle down and go full lynch mob?
So is this the sentiment shared by everyone in support of this?
This comment in particular I mean. Have they gotten far more courtesy than they deserve?
Now it's time to buckle down and go full lynch mob?
Are there any comparisons of Beta vs Retail section of the game?
Ok but this is meaningless
Since we dont have a perspective on the overall majority of the feedback or what decisions were made after the fact
How the hell could we possibly know if the lighting could have been kept in or not and still satisfy performance requirements
I guess itll be a good thing if From ever decides to comment on the Last gen console development and put this to rest
And I think this is the thing the naysayers aren't understanding. No one expects the PS3 to be some super computer, but when you specifically show off builds and then change it at the last moment without saying anything, after months of twich previews and interviews, go fuck yourself. You don't deserve my business.What's bullshit, is not saying so.
Are there any comparisons of Beta vs Retail section of the game?
Yes, to number 1. Number 2, it is not just ugly -- they changed the game play mechanics as well (i will not go over this shit again, read the thread). I would have waited for the PS4 or the PC versions. I would not waste $60 on a game that looks like PS2 at times.
My biggest hope is that this thread and campaign makes them consider adding the lightning to the PC version.
If the PC version gets the lightning, there is our answer, they couldnt get it running on consoles, the end.
If the PC is missing it, then it was clearly just false advertising, no way around it.
My biggest hope is that this thread and campaign makes them consider adding the lightning to the PC version.
If the PC version gets the lightning, there is our answer, they couldnt get it running on consoles, the end.
If the PC is missing it, then it was clearly just false advertising, no way around it.
Isn't the F word a bannable offense on GAF?
- Console War. Obviously arguments about consoles, platforms, and publishers are going to get heated. Don't make things worse by calling out "xbots" or "ntards" or "fanboys" or "sdf" or "xdf" or insulting someone else by calling them one of those things. Clearly some people get a bit too attached, but the best thing you can do is try to improve conversation, not make it worse by dragging it down in the mud. It's also important to make sure you aren't getting too attached. If you find yourself getting super defensive about something or claiming that everyone other than you is "biased", chances are you should probably take a little break from the thread. Don't worry about calling out others--if moderators seem to be missing the thread, just call it to our attention via PM.
- Thread Whining / Respect to Others. It's not that "Haters gonna hate" is a banned meme, it's that it's often used to be flippant and dismissive to other posters. If someone is trying to explain what they think about something, either treat them with respect or don't reply at all. So when you post "u mad", "deal with it", "haters gonna hate", "the GAF hivemind", "the usual suspects", "but GAF said x and now they're saying y!!!", "entitled whiners" or anything else that suggests that you don't care what other people think, you may be banned if it is taking away from discussion. This is getting to be a pretty big problem, and it's probably the single largest category of bans these days. If you don't want to discuss something, you don't need to post.
Promise -> Optimize -> Release
It is a necessary compromise. I call it software development with intention to release.
My biggest hope is that this thread and campaign makes them consider adding the lightning to the PC version.
If the PC version gets the lightning, there is our answer, they couldnt get it running on consoles, the end.
If the PC is missing it, then it was clearly just false advertising, no way around it.
So is this the sentiment shared by everyone in support of this?
This comment in particular I mean. Have they gotten far more courtesy than they deserve?
Now it's time to buckle down and go full lynch mob?
So we're on the same page then? We do want From to comment on these changes after all, that's a big part of what this thread is about.
Indeed. I don't even know why we're giving these guys so much attention when they're not even trying to pay attention to what's going on.I remember hearing that a lot during Operation Rainfall, and I mean a lot.
"You people act so entitled wanting a company to release games! They gave you Mario, now shut up already". (real quote)
You really just have to ignore those that are against you and stick with what you want or believe because there will always be people telling you they disagree and even labeling you as crazy or extreme.
Explain the good looking demo versions running fine on PS3 at TGS and press events.No
But its crazy to me that people feel duped when every multiplatform game with a PC/Nextgen version has similar gaps.
Yep. We're the variety that pushes the companies to make the best products instead of sit idly and take whatever they throw at usIronically, I think most of the people pushing for an acknowledgment would also identify as fanboys/fangirls of the Souls series.
What are you talking about?
EDIT:
Nevermind. A quick look at your post history regarding the Dark Souls 2 downgrades is all I need to see to know where you're coming from.
Of course. But at the end of the day you were the one that purchased the Blu-Ray without doing any research.Regardless of however good the game may be, it does not excuse From.
People defending them, stop. From lied. It's simple. All we want is them to answer, a simple paragraph, even would help, a sentence, rather than the media blackout they are doing now.
Imagine watching a Blu-ray movie in a store, on one of the TV's, then going "Ok, I'll buy that movie"
You buy it. You pop it in. The colors are washed out, the detail isn't there, it's blurry, perhaps even some artifacting. Wouldn't you be upset?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0AHSCyNUKgg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lvdmN3tUbtY
Looks pretty similar to me.
did you pay 60$ for Dark Souls 1?
also, people are posting screenshots of worse of the worst, anyone can find horrific screenshots of most games that are this big.
Like for instance, look at this picture of Uncharted 2, supposedly one of the best console games graphically
I think that are freaking out about the torch mechanics are also kind of silly. Torches can be super helpful in certain areas.
I understand that you guys are upset that the game doesn't look as pretty as advertised. That sucks, but the massive hyperbole in this thread is ridiculous. The game looks stellar in certain parts, and if you are a souls fan, then you will most likely like this game.
Therein lies the problem. Promise -> Optimize -> Release is not something that happens very often, except lately. People are pissed because that process line is missing one crucial bullet.
Promise -> Optimize -> FUCKING TELL EVERYONE -> Release
Whatever dude your comment sounds like you're out for blood. Do you own the game? Or is the PC version you are worried about?
Indeed. I don't even know why we're giving these guys so much attention when they're not even trying to pay attention to what's going on.
Explain the good looking demo versions running fine on PS3 at TGS and press events.
Indeed. We're the variety that pushes the companies to make the best products instead of sit idly and take whatever they throw at us
Indeed. I don't even know why we're giving these guys so much attention when they're not even trying to pay attention to what's going on.
Explain the good looking demo versions running fine on PS3 at TGS and press events.
Yep. We're the variety that pushes the companies to make the best products instead of sit idly and take whatever they throw at us
also, people are posting screenshots of worse of the worst, anyone can find horrific screenshots of most games that are this big.
The thing is, From just showed us that we can't trust the direct-to-consumer events either.
you know that this is exactly what they are going to say, if they even say something.
"We had to downgrade the graphical quality to make certain that the framerate was stable in certain areas"
dark10x confirmed to us that he played the game on PS3.We need proof the TGS Demo was on a PS3
Then From shouldn't have kept using old, much better looking footage to advertise the game.And even then it was a damn demo
Beta is a much better measuring stick and while there seems to be a downgrade from the Beta at least it would have been apparent that adjustments had to be made to satisfy performance.
Especially if you were one of the people to experience performance issues during the Beta
It's not our fault that the same areas From showed in the reveal and consequent demos look that bad in the retail game.
The thing is, From just showed us that we can't trust the direct-to-consumer events either.
Of course. But at the end of the day you were the one that purchased the Blu-Ray without doing any research.
The only people I have a problem with are the people who say "I wouldn't have purchased DS2 if I knew about these issues". These issues are relatively minor and would be obvious to someone if they just waited a few hours before rushing out and buying the game. Crap like the PS3 Skyrim issues are completely unacceptable, but this? If this is unacceptable to you, then don't buy games without reading impressions, viewing retail videos, or renting it first.
Feel free to complain, you have every right to. And you should. But I'm very apathetic to those who make ridiculous claims.
dark10x confirmed to us that he played the game on PS3.
Then From shouldn't have kept using old, much better looking footage to advertise the game.