themadcowtipper
Smells faintly of rancid stilton.
I believe this rumor much more then the ign rumor because it suits my agenda.
IGN's rumor is more current. This rumor is based on something apparently heard in December. This story goes more like this.
"We heard that WiiU is twice as powerful as 360, which is less powerful than expectations and someone had to descale."
"We could not confirm this rumor at the time we heard it and did not feel confident posting it."
"IGN just came out with a rumor that WiiU is 5x more powerful than 360 and exceeds expectations."
"We're posting our 2x rumor even though it's apparently outdated now!"
Though, if they heard it in December, that's a very short amount of time between the information for things to change this drastically.
Which means either (or likely both) Develop or IGN are lying through their teeth.
I believe this rumor much more then the ign rumor because it suits my agenda.
I suspect all these rumors are at least partially wrong for all platforms.
Don't final dev kits typically include drastic changes? 2 weeks ago, final dev kits didn't exist. Now they do. I thought it was pretty straight forward that the statements made in the article aren't relevant. Hell, the ARTICLE ITSELF says it might not be.Though, if they heard it in December, that's a very short amount of time between the information for things to change this drastically.
Nintendo Wii U Doubles Performance of Xbox 360 Game Designer.
Wii U Game System Projected to Offer Two Times Higher Performance than X360
[01/25/2012 02:31 PM]
by Anton Shilov
While numerous analysts and observers claim that Nintendos next-generation video game console is not truly powerful and generally belongs to the current-generation of systems. But a game developer who has tried the console believes that it is much more powerful than is generally expected.
A game developer from a company working on a Wii U title, who decided to remain anonymous as the information about performance is not supposed to be made public, told Develop web-site that the next-generation Nintendo console could achieve roughly twice the processing and graphical potential of Microsofts current generation machine. By contrast, another person involved into design of video games complained about insufficient performance of Wii U.
I've heard [a project designer] complain it was underpowered compared to what Nintendo announced, resulting in people having to de-scale their plans, said the anonymous game developer.
Though, if they heard it in December, that's a very short amount of time between the information for things to change this drastically.
One thing I'm still foggy on...are they talking entirety of the system?didn't the final dev kits just get released recently, and wasn't the rumor behind those being that they were a lot stronger than expected?
totally possible for the wii u to be weaker than desired in december and for the '5x' rumor from ign to also be true.
This rumor reminds me of some the stuff that came out right after E3 though, when we heard about dev kits with off the shelf parts, being underclocked, etc. Seems pretty strange that in December it would suddenly go backwards after all the small tidbits about the devkits improving over the months since E3, and now the more recent "new dev kits stronger than expected."
Perhaps their source was quoting much older info(assuming this rumor is at all legit)?
And maybe one dev is really good at getting performance out of the tech and the other isn't.they could actually both be true. "5x more powerful" might be a theoretical limit on one component, whereas 2x might be the practical speed of the entire system put together.
Though, if they heard it in December, that's a very short amount of time between the information for things to change this drastically.
Though, if they heard it in December, that's a very short amount of time between the information for things to change this drastically.
didn't the final dev kits just get released recently, and wasn't the rumor behind those being that they were a lot stronger than expected?
totally possible for the wii u to be weaker than desired in december and for the '5x' rumor from ign to also be true.
That's a little one sided.Someone should just make a thread that says "[Rumor}: Wii U to be 5x More Powerful than 360." Most gaffers don't read past thread titles anyway.
Cept there you'll get a bunch of -
"What? I don't buy it."
"I'll believe it when I see it"
"It's nintendo. Does anyone but fanboys honestly think this is remotely possible?"
as opposed to the dumbass illiterate clowns who are popping in here and elsewhere to say "I told you so" like they're they next pachter.
how much more powerful than the nes is this?
That's what I thought until now.
Have you read his comment below the article?, apparently he isn't saying that. He's saying he couldn't post his info until it was verified. But that IGN's article was close enough to his info for him to consider it verified now so he could post it. Despite his info being 2x and IGN being 5x. Its a very odd article by a guy who just seemed desperate to post the info and latched onto some very dodgy logic in order for him to get it posted "Well my info say its more powerful than 360, so does IGN so IGN verifies my source despite the massive differences".. yeah ok...
I thought they said 5x current gen 360IGN said "5x current gen*"
*current gen being the Wii.
I thought they said 5x current gen 360
Barely. NES outclasses it in some aspectsby virtue of including a robot
So, the Wii U is twice the 720, but the PS4 is more powerful than the 720. But is the PS4 more powerful than the Wii U? Hmm, I thought the Wii U was suppose to be a generation behind again, but apparently it's the most powerful ever. If all of these silly rumors are to be believed.
So, the Wii U is twice the 720, but the PS4 is more powerful than the 720. But is the PS4 more powerful than the Wii U? Hmm, I thought the Wii U was suppose to be a generation behind again, but apparently it's the most powerful ever. If all of these silly rumors are to be believed.
Wii U was never even supposed to use a quad core CPU, but the CPU probably isn't comparable to Xenon, either. It's not about the number of cores or the clockspeed alone.If WiiU is still a quad-core PPC comparable to Xenon, I don't see how they get "twice as powerful". Maybe it's clocked up to 4Ghz, but then heat becomes a big factor. Even at 22nm, I find it hard to believe Nintendo can fit a 4Ghz quad into the chassis that's been shown with adequate cooling.
But easily double the ram to 1GB, an extra core (no matter the clock), and a more recent GPU chipset, maybe you can round up to "twice as powerful".
I still say that amounts to current-gen games with smoother framerate, not competitive with the next-gen platforms.
If WiiU is still a quad-core PPC comparable to Xenon, I don't see how they get "twice as powerful". Maybe it's clocked up to 4Ghz, but then heat becomes a big factor. Even at 22nm, I find it hard to believe Nintendo can fit a 4Ghz quad into the chassis that's been shown with adequate cooling.
But easily double the ram to 1GB, an extra core (no matter the clock), and a more recent GPU chipset, maybe you can round up to "twice as powerful".
I still say that amounts to current-gen games with smoother framerate, not competitive with the next-gen platforms.
So they waited until another outlet released more up to date information before posting their outdated and apparently still unverified old rumor? What a dumb, confusing way to report "news".
If WiiU is still a quad-core PPC comparable to Xenon, I don't see how they get "twice as powerful". Maybe it's clocked up to 4Ghz, but then heat becomes a big factor. Even at 22nm, I find it hard to believe Nintendo can fit a 4Ghz quad into the chassis that's been shown with adequate cooling.
But easily double the ram to 1GB, an extra core (no matter the clock), and a more recent GPU chipset, maybe you can round up to "twice as powerful".
I still say that amounts to current-gen games with smoother framerate, not competitive with the next-gen platforms.
It would be pretty lame to only be comparable to Xenon at this point given shitty Core2duo laptop cpus from a few years ago easily outclass Xenon today.. :S
If WiiU is still a quad-core PPC comparable to Xenon, I don't see how they get "twice as powerful".
Not only that, Xenon also has very little cache and only six instruction units per core (integer, FP, branch, load/store and 2x VSX128). Power7 for example has twelve (2x integer, 4x FP, 1x DFP, 1x VSX, branch, 2x load/store, condition register), most of which in itself far more powerful than their Xenon equivalent.Out-of-order execution > In-order execution
You don't think the 3DS is double the power of the PSP?After the 3DS I find this highly unlikely, they have been working on the 3DS and WiiU simultaneously at some point.. why would the two hardware strategies diverge so much?
Eh? That's like when the GameCube was underpowered because they were working on the Game Boy Advance as well.After the 3DS I find this highly unlikely, they have been working on the 3DS and WiiU simultaneously at some point.. why would the two hardware strategies diverge so much?
Eh? That's like when the GameCube was underpowered because they were working on the Game Boy Advance as well.Oh wait.
You don't think the 3DS is double the power of the PSP?
After the 3DS I find this highly unlikely, they have been working on the 3DS and WiiU simultaneously at some point.. why would the two hardware strategies diverge so much?
We had comparable handhelds ten years earlier for only around $100 more (Atari Lynx, Turbo Express). A whole lot more definitely could have been done with GBA spec wise.Thats true. Good point. Although at that time it seemed as if it was impossible to do anything affordable with mainstream handheld technology.
So well more than 2x? 24MB to 96MB? Baked Spots to Self Shadowing? Dithering to MSAA?I think the PSP to 3DS leap is the same leap we can expect from 360 to WiiU.
okay then can we say significantly or slightly or much more powerful? too vague i know.