• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Develop Rumor: Wii U 'twice as powerful as Xbox 360'

IGN's rumor is more current. This rumor is based on something apparently heard in December. This story goes more like this.

"We heard that WiiU is twice as powerful as 360, which is less powerful than expectations and someone had to descale."
"We could not confirm this rumor at the time we heard it and did not feel confident posting it."
"IGN just came out with a rumor that WiiU is 5x more powerful than 360 and exceeds expectations."
"We're posting our 2x rumor even though it's apparently outdated now!"

Though, if they heard it in December, that's a very short amount of time between the information for things to change this drastically.
 
I believe this rumor much more then the ign rumor because it suits my agenda.

they could actually both be true. "5x more powerful" might be a theoretical limit on one component, whereas 2x might be the practical speed of the entire system put together.

Obviously, an improvement over the previous gen is 'required' but considering the additional heat and other problems that factor in on hardware design, a relatively "mild" improvement will always be more likely than "hey let's cram this supercomputer that needs water cooling and airco to remain stable inside a small box for consumer use".

Honestly, twice the Xbox360 would do for most functions, except that multiple tablets + the television screen (and the virtual overlap beyond the screen on the tablets) would require a lot more -I would imagine- than just that to run stable at HD and higher framerates.

I expect it to look good and run properly, I do not expect it to rival PC's. As far as I am aware, a PC from one year or two ago is a few times more powerful than a console, but not all that "power overwhelming" kind more powerful. That would be my guess of where the Wii U will end up in terms in specs. In particular because that setup can be miniaturized and still be cooled properly.

edit: which is actually vague as hell, now that I'm reading it. :')
(and rumors are indeed almost always wrong and everyone forgets about them when the reveal occurs. So useless really)
 
Though, if they heard it in December, that's a very short amount of time between the information for things to change this drastically.
Don't final dev kits typically include drastic changes? 2 weeks ago, final dev kits didn't exist. Now they do. I thought it was pretty straight forward that the statements made in the article aren't relevant. Hell, the ARTICLE ITSELF says it might not be.
 
xbitlabs picked up the develop story:


Nintendo Wii U Doubles Performance of Xbox 360 – Game Designer.
Wii U Game System Projected to Offer Two Times Higher Performance than X360

[01/25/2012 02:31 PM]
by Anton Shilov


While numerous analysts and observers claim that Nintendo’s next-generation video game console is not truly powerful and generally belongs to the current-generation of systems. But a game developer who has tried the console believes that it is much more powerful than is generally expected.

A game developer from a company working on a Wii U title, who decided to remain anonymous as the information about performance is not supposed to be made public, told Develop web-site that the next-generation Nintendo console could achieve roughly twice the processing and graphical potential of Microsoft’s current generation machine. By contrast, another person involved into design of video games complained about insufficient performance of Wii U.

“I've heard [a project designer] complain it was underpowered compared to what Nintendo announced, resulting in people having to de-scale their plans,” said the anonymous game developer.


http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/multim...es_Performance_of_Xbox_360_Game_Designer.html
 
Though, if they heard it in December, that's a very short amount of time between the information for things to change this drastically.

didn't the final dev kits just get released recently, and wasn't the rumor behind those being that they were a lot stronger than expected?

totally possible for the wii u to be weaker than desired in december and for the '5x' rumor from ign to also be true.
 
didn't the final dev kits just get released recently, and wasn't the rumor behind those being that they were a lot stronger than expected?

totally possible for the wii u to be weaker than desired in december and for the '5x' rumor from ign to also be true.
One thing I'm still foggy on...are they talking entirety of the system?

Because I doubt that the WiiU has anything more than a 640 SPU part.
 
This rumor reminds me of some the stuff that came out right after E3 though, when we heard about dev kits with off the shelf parts, being underclocked, etc. Seems pretty strange that in December it would suddenly go backwards after all the small tidbits about the devkits improving over the months since E3, and now the more recent "new dev kits stronger than expected."

Perhaps their source was quoting much older info(assuming this rumor is at all legit)?
 
This rumor reminds me of some the stuff that came out right after E3 though, when we heard about dev kits with off the shelf parts, being underclocked, etc. Seems pretty strange that in December it would suddenly go backwards after all the small tidbits about the devkits improving over the months since E3, and now the more recent "new dev kits stronger than expected."

Perhaps their source was quoting much older info(assuming this rumor is at all legit)?

Yeah the info is questionable because the info we got on the earliest devkits pointed at minimum 3x increase on paper alone. Nintendo would have had to take steps backwards when all data points to the opposite with performance gains.
 
they could actually both be true. "5x more powerful" might be a theoretical limit on one component, whereas 2x might be the practical speed of the entire system put together.
And maybe one dev is really good at getting performance out of the tech and the other isn't.
 
didn't the final dev kits just get released recently, and wasn't the rumor behind those being that they were a lot stronger than expected?

totally possible for the wii u to be weaker than desired in december and for the '5x' rumor from ign to also be true.

The narrative I've read the past week was that the final dev kits released around CES featured a considerable jump in power over the previous kit.
 
Someone should just make a thread that says "[Rumor}: Wii U to be 5x More Powerful than 360." Most gaffers don't read past thread titles anyway.

Cept there you'll get a bunch of -

"What? I don't buy it."

"I'll believe it when I see it"

"It's nintendo. Does anyone but fanboys honestly think this is remotely possible?"

as opposed to the dumbass illiterate clowns who are popping in here and elsewhere to say "I told you so" like they're they next pachter.
That's a little one sided.

Remember you don't know Wii U's capabilities either so the ones you are mocking could actually be right. They could also be wrong but their opinion is as valid as yours.
 
I just don't know what to think now.

Wii U is 2x the 360 in graphics
or
Wii U is 5x the 360 in graphics

I guess it'll fall somewhere inbetween.

We need more detailed GPU specs (duh).

Regardless, developers like Retro and EAD Tokyo will be able to work wonders with even twice the graphical power of the 360.
 
That's what I thought until now.

Have you read his comment below the article?, apparently he isn't saying that. He's saying he couldn't post his info until it was verified. But that IGN's article was close enough to his info for him to consider it verified now so he could post it. Despite his info being 2x and IGN being 5x. Its a very odd article by a guy who just seemed desperate to post the info and latched onto some very dodgy logic in order for him to get it posted "Well my info say its more powerful than 360, so does IGN so IGN verifies my source despite the massive differences".. yeah ok...

IGN said "5x current gen*"












*current gen being the Wii.
 
If WiiU is still a quad-core PPC comparable to Xenon, I don't see how they get "twice as powerful". Maybe it's clocked up to 4Ghz, but then heat becomes a big factor. Even at 22nm, I find it hard to believe Nintendo can fit a 4Ghz quad into the chassis that's been shown with adequate cooling.

But easily double the ram to 1GB, an extra core (no matter the clock), and a more recent GPU chipset, maybe you can round up to "twice as powerful".

I still say that amounts to current-gen games with smoother framerate, not competitive with the next-gen platforms.
 
So, the Wii U is twice the 720, but the PS4 is more powerful than the 720. But is the PS4 more powerful than the Wii U? Hmm, I thought the Wii U was suppose to be a generation behind again, but apparently it's the most powerful ever. If all of these silly rumors are to be believed.
 
So, the Wii U is twice the 720, but the PS4 is more powerful than the 720. But is the PS4 more powerful than the Wii U? Hmm, I thought the Wii U was suppose to be a generation behind again, but apparently it's the most powerful ever. If all of these silly rumors are to be believed.

Reading is fun! Try it!
 
So, the Wii U is twice the 720, but the PS4 is more powerful than the 720. But is the PS4 more powerful than the Wii U? Hmm, I thought the Wii U was suppose to be a generation behind again, but apparently it's the most powerful ever. If all of these silly rumors are to be believed.

WiiU is twice the 360, not the next Xbox.
 
If WiiU is still a quad-core PPC comparable to Xenon, I don't see how they get "twice as powerful". Maybe it's clocked up to 4Ghz, but then heat becomes a big factor. Even at 22nm, I find it hard to believe Nintendo can fit a 4Ghz quad into the chassis that's been shown with adequate cooling.

But easily double the ram to 1GB, an extra core (no matter the clock), and a more recent GPU chipset, maybe you can round up to "twice as powerful".

I still say that amounts to current-gen games with smoother framerate, not competitive with the next-gen platforms.
Wii U was never even supposed to use a quad core CPU, but the CPU probably isn't comparable to Xenon, either. It's not about the number of cores or the clockspeed alone.
 
If WiiU is still a quad-core PPC comparable to Xenon, I don't see how they get "twice as powerful". Maybe it's clocked up to 4Ghz, but then heat becomes a big factor. Even at 22nm, I find it hard to believe Nintendo can fit a 4Ghz quad into the chassis that's been shown with adequate cooling.

It's a 45nm chip (as of the initial dev kits, at least) and is not related to the 360/PS3's PPE. GHz won't mean a thing in this regard, as they haven't mattered for half a decade now anyway.

But easily double the ram to 1GB, an extra core (no matter the clock), and a more recent GPU chipset, maybe you can round up to "twice as powerful".

It will have more than 1GB of RAM, and less than 2GB of RAM according to the latest leaks in the Wii U thread.

I still say that amounts to current-gen games with smoother framerate, not competitive with the next-gen platforms.

You haven't been reading other next gen rumour threads, clearly.

Edit: partially beaten by wsippel
 
If WiiU is still a quad-core PPC comparable to Xenon, I don't see how they get "twice as powerful". Maybe it's clocked up to 4Ghz, but then heat becomes a big factor. Even at 22nm, I find it hard to believe Nintendo can fit a 4Ghz quad into the chassis that's been shown with adequate cooling.

But easily double the ram to 1GB, an extra core (no matter the clock), and a more recent GPU chipset, maybe you can round up to "twice as powerful".

I still say that amounts to current-gen games with smoother framerate, not competitive with the next-gen platforms.

It would be pretty lame to only be comparable to Xenon at this point given shitty Core2duo laptop cpus from a few years ago easily outclass Xenon today.. :S
 
It would be pretty lame to only be comparable to Xenon at this point given shitty Core2duo laptop cpus from a few years ago easily outclass Xenon today.. :S

As a general purpose CPU, Xenon (and Cell by extension - considering it uses the same main core) were outclassed on their release dates. Depends on the criteria you look at, I guess.
 
Out-of-order execution > In-order execution
Not only that, Xenon also has very little cache and only six instruction units per core (integer, FP, branch, load/store and 2x VSX128). Power7 for example has twelve (2x integer, 4x FP, 1x DFP, 1x VSX, branch, 2x load/store, condition register), most of which in itself far more powerful than their Xenon equivalent.
 
After the 3DS I find this highly unlikely, they have been working on the 3DS and WiiU simultaneously at some point.. why would the two hardware strategies diverge so much?
 
After the 3DS I find this highly unlikely, they have been working on the 3DS and WiiU simultaneously at some point.. why would the two hardware strategies diverge so much?
Eh? That's like when the GameCube was underpowered because they were working on the Game Boy Advance as well.
Oh wait.
 
Eh? That's like when the GameCube was underpowered because they were working on the Game Boy Advance as well.
Oh wait.

Thats true. Good point. Although at that time it seemed as if it was impossible to do anything affordable with mainstream handheld technology.


You don't think the 3DS is double the power of the PSP?


I think the PSP to 3DS leap is the same leap we can expect from 360 to WiiU.
 
After the 3DS I find this highly unlikely, they have been working on the 3DS and WiiU simultaneously at some point.. why would the two hardware strategies diverge so much?

DS/Wii diverged on hardware strategies, why wouldn't 3DS/WU?


Thats true. Good point. Although at that time it seemed as if it was impossible to do anything affordable with mainstream handheld technology.
We had comparable handhelds ten years earlier for only around $100 more (Atari Lynx, Turbo Express). A whole lot more definitely could have been done with GBA spec wise.



I think the PSP to 3DS leap is the same leap we can expect from 360 to WiiU.
So well more than 2x? 24MB to 96MB? Baked Spots to Self Shadowing? Dithering to MSAA? :P
 
These "two times as powerful" "five times as powerful" comparisons need to die, like a decade ago.

This is not the days of 8 bit, 16 bit, blast processing.
 
Top Bottom