SupremeHoodie
Member
That’s ps5.This is a perfect example of Xbox marketing strategy. It's called premature ejaculation. Typical egg on face
That’s ps5.This is a perfect example of Xbox marketing strategy. It's called premature ejaculation. Typical egg on face
Curry looks more realistic on Xbox. MJ looks like a plastic action figure on both. DF not critiqueing the ps5 version because they’re scared of sonygaf.
DF Cyberpunk 2077 comparison between PS5 and XsX versions is gonna crash this forum isn’t it? Waiting for the megaton video.
Most people that play nba 2k use the 2k camera. Not broadcast.
Nope the colors are actually different. A guy here posted side by side gameplay.
Exactly genius but it's explained in the video where it's taken from and why it's at that frame rate.That’s ps5.
I just saw the video on DF back to back. Its 99% the same. I could care less what some guy posted, he could have posted anything, before a patch, different arenas, anything.
Perfectly illustrates selective outrage.Exactly genius but it's explained in the video where it's taken from and why it's at that frame rate.
Perfectly illustrates fangirls jumping the gun.
Df video doesn’t show a detailed side by side like that other video so you can choose to ignore facts.I just saw the video on DF back to back. Its 99% the same. I could care less what some guy posted, he could have posted anything, before a patch, different arenas, anything.
Perfectly illustrates selective outrage.
That just show PS5 has more horse power to run them... it is even sweat less like expected from the world most powerful console.They don’t sweat as much on ps5, both footage are from Curry pregame. MJ nearly identical scene.
Or... The scene is fillrate bound and Series X is struggling more because XSX GPU has 18% less pixel fillrate throughput than PS5 GPU among with triangle rasterization, etc. XSX simply needs a resolution drop through dynamic res scaler here as the processing of final pixel values is dependent on ROPs/pixel fillrate.Series S flawless 60fps except for the parametric camera option where there is bigger dips.
Seires X has single frame drops plus bigger dips in parametric camera option.
I just watched that part of the video.. Looks like they got to where they could for launch and pushed it out. Nothing that a patch couldn't remove.
I thought we were ahead the denial phase already lolNope the colors are actually different. A guy here posted side by side gameplay. Df are scared of Sonygaf. That’s all. Some guy even posted a snapshot of ps5 frame drop but df won’t harp on it because if backlash.
I thought we were ahead the denial phase already lol
Could be. But then then the series S has the same problems with the same camera angle.Or... The scene is fillrate bound and Series X is struggling more because XSX GPU has 18% less pixel fillrate throughput than PS5 GPU among with triangle rasterization, etc. XSX simply needs a resolution drop through dynamic res scaler here as the processing of final pixel values is dependent on ROPs/pixel fillrate.
So on the camera angle that every single person who plays this game uses the XSX is below 60? Noted
Ignore the facts.
Series S seems to do a bit better than Series X because the res is very low 1080p (compared to native 4K). Hence the "GPU related drops" on XSX.Could be. But then then the series S has the same problems with the same camera angle.
Ignore the facts.
You might want to check your tag while in DF threads ribbing people.I thought we were ahead the denial phase already lol
Yeah it doesn't have the same 1fps dip in normal play. But I was talking about the other camera angleSeries S seems to do a bit better than Series X because the res is very low 1080p (compared to native 4K). Hence the "GPU related drops" on XSX.
Why would it not be the case anymore? There hasn’t been some huge update patch on the consoles for graphical fidelity for this game.Facts ? U r really delusional it seems.This video was posted a month ago to begin with . If it is to believe it was correct , it is not the case anymore. He mentioned games run on exact same setting .
Series S....better 60fps than....Series X?? But not PS5...
Riky!!!
Sorry, they are hard to tell apart...
We'll see, also with the RDNA2 features I would think within 12 months Series S could be pushing PS5 pretty hard, I wouldn't worry about Series X If I were you it'll be out of sight by then.
Wut?You might want to check your tag while in DF threads ribbing people.
Pro using last gen visuals...Summary:
NBA 2K21 brings a huge leap in realism for next-gen consoles
It's been a long time since we've covered sports titles at Digital Foundry, but with the arrival of NBA 2K21 on the new…www.eurogamer.net
PS4 Pro at native 4K and Series S at native 1080p....
I know you were talking about the parametric camera angle. Series X has slightly more inconsistent fps dips than Series S due to it rendering 4x more pixels than S. The X just needs to scale down res below PS5 to clean up those fps drops.eah it doesn't have the same 1fps dip in normal play. But I was talking about the other camera angle
Ignore the facts.
What you don't think that the devs could have removed them? Especially as they are present on both consoles XsX and XsS. Which would imply more of something on their end (the devs) as opposed to "pixel fillrate" No? A bug or a little bit of extra optimisation..I know you were talking about the parametric camera angle. Series X has slightly more inconsistent fps dips than Series S due to it rendering 4x more pixels than S. The X just needs to scale down res below PS5 to clean up those fps drops.
Oh I see u r in denial phase of grief. Ps5 is just slightly better . It is what it is .hopefully u get to acceptance soon.Why would it not be the case anymore? There hasn’t been some huge update patch on the consoles for graphical fidelity for this game.
a single frame advantage (rare) at the same price without gamepass ..incredible !PS5 is on another level currently, we need them tools ASAP!
Sonygaf laughing at facts. But someone’s gotta spread the truth. Like that missionary that went to that island where isolated tribes live and he got killed for spreading the word of Christ.
Ignore the facts.
I'm seeing a pattern here. In multiple games now that have the same resolution on both, PS5 performs ever so slightly better. I don't think every game is bugged. In AssCreed when the resolution is similar (1440p) on both, XSX performed worse than PS5. XSX required an aggressive res scaler to clean up those fps dips. Pixel fillrate on XSX: 116 Gpix/s, PS5: 142.7 Gpix/s. As I said, the unit inside the GPU that handles the final pixel values is clearly much faster in PS5. There are other units like the vector ALU and TMUs that are faster in XSX.What you don't think that the devs could have removed them? Especially as they are present on both consoles XsX and XsS. Which would imply more of something on their end (the devs) as opposed to "pixel fillrate" No? A bug or a little bit of extra optimisation..
It’s called “comparison was made at two different points in the game”. He obviously got footage from the ps5 first, then had to wait on the Xbox for curry to make a similar face so they could be somewhat comparable. It’s not rocket surgeryOh wow those color differences are real. And the sweat shader on Curry is far more noticeable on XSX.
they run and look exactly the same, except for one exception: the parametric camera option runs locked at 60fps on PlayStation 5, but does drop frames on Series consoles. Thankfully, this is easily avoided by using other camera angles (and the parametric viewpoint isn't actually that great for gameplay).
lol
they are basically the same, no one uses the parametric viewpoint anyway.
Also, it looks more like a bug if it’s only dropping in a certain camera angle.
Ah, how these comparisons keep delivering...Nope the colors are actually different. A guy here posted side by side gameplay. Df are scared of Sonygaf. That’s all. Some guy even posted a snapshot of ps5 frame drop but df won’t harp on it because if backlash.