PackAPunchedMick
Member
Still there are people downplaying what a £349 console is achieving. lol.
In a previous video, DigitalFoundry said that Battlefield 1 lacks some details on PS4 like SSR on weapons. Was that added in the PS4 PRO version? Is there a locked 1080p mode with maxed out details like Mass Effect Andromeda?
I still don't know why they compare this to the PC, nobody wants to know if the PC with a 1080/TitanX is better. Why don't they just compare the Pro with the PS4 and XB1S to see the improvements from there.
To see where it fits in term of scalability and settings.
Yeah these are the things I'm talking about as well, don't just say these things are missing or that the PC has better settings. Show me the differences visually.In a previous video, DigitalFoundry said that Battlefield 1 lacks some details on PS4 like SSR on weapons. Was that added in the PS4 PRO version? Is there a locked 1080p mode with maxed out details like Mass Effect Andromeda?
Yeah these are the things I'm talking about as well, don't just say these things are missing or that the PC has better settings. Show me the differences visually.
I hope NX delivers here....
99.9% of the population don't game on high end pcs that cost 2000$, they play on laptops that run LoL and CS or Consoles for Fifa or call of Duty.
So pretty amazing for 400 box.
nvidias recent financial results show you're wrong
I see DF keeps comparing a $2000 PC with a $400 console..... LOL!
Yeah, but most of their profit doesn't come from gaming related sales tho.
I see DF keeps comparing a $2000 PC with a $400 console..... LOL!
No SSR is sadly not in. Was hoping for that.
Whats that?
Yeah, but most of their profit doesn't come from gaming related sales tho.
99.9% of the population don't game on high end pcs that cost 2000$, they play on laptops that run LoL and CS or Consoles for Fifa or call of Duty.
So pretty amazing for 400€ box.
With percentages out of your ass? Oh it's viHuGi, what a surprise.
The number of active steam users with PS4 Pro-like specs is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the number of PS4 Pro's currently out there.
Well over 18 million actually, just skimming through Steam hardware survey.
I WOULD, however like to see Digital Foundry bring back the budget PC comparison to throw in there too.
What does it take today to match or maybe slightly beat the PS4 Pro and see how that scales to the PS4 Pro as time goes on, both in terms of performance and price. Just like they did with their 750ti box, which did pretty damn well if IIRC.
This way you get a sense of really understanding where each game stands, and how it performs on budge and premium consoles, and on a budget and premium PC.
From that res it's probably upscaled to a larger resolution and then checkerboarded.That resolution bit - is that the final resolution or does it mean that is the native resolution before the checkerboard technique takes it up to 4k?
PC Gamer did this 3 years ago for OG PS4, didn't work well http://www.pcgamer.com/pc-gamer-vs-playstation-4-theres-only-ever-going-to-be-one-winner-right/
Why is there a PC master race discussion again?
Half-hearted attempt with a far better cpu, far better gpu and without optimal prices.
I did the same before the PS4 even launched in germany and it worked quite well.
Half-hearted attempt with a far better cpu, far better gpu and without optimal prices.
I did the same before the PS4 even launched in germany and it worked quite well.
I guess all those people returning their Pro's after that The Last of Us topic must be feeling the heat now
I guess all those people returning their Pro's after that The Last of Us topic must be feeling the heat now
I guess all those people returning their Pro's after that The Last of Us topic must be feeling the heat now
With those specs? I doubt so, sorry.
I guess all those people returning their Pro's after that The Last of Us topic must be feeling the heat now
You don't need a 2000$ PC to play at 1440p with medium settings, if those are your worries.
With percentages out of your ass? Oh it's viHuGi, what a surprise.
The number of active steam users with PS4 Pro-like specs is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the number of PS4 Pro's currently out there. Well over 18 million actually, just skimming through Steam hardware survey.
I WOULD, however like to see Digital Foundry bring back the budget PC comparison to throw in there too. What does it take today to match or maybe slightly beat the PS4 Pro and see how that scales to the PS4 Pro as time goes on, both in terms of performance and price. Just like they did with their 750ti box, which did pretty damn well if IIRC.
This way you get a sense of really understanding where each game stands, and how it performs on budge and premium consoles, and on a budget and premium PC.
PC Gamer did this 3 years ago for OG PS4, didn't work well – http://www.pcgamer.com/pc-gamer-vs-playstation-4-theres-only-ever-going-to-be-one-winner-right/
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=85031761&postcount=845
Better cpu, far better gpu.
It even had a useless Blu-Ray drive.
Though in the real world i would have added 30€ for a quality nt, kick the Blu-Ray drive out and replace the cpu with a 6300.
You're the first one to bring up the term, so you tell us.
But my guess is that some people are angry that DF dared to show a PC performing better than their shiny new console, and feel defensive about it, so must start saying nonsense like it costs $2,000+ and no one has a PC like that so it doesn't matter, etc, etc.
Nevermind that a PC is precisely the perfect book end in order to place the PS4 and PS4 pro in a continuum of performance. That's valuable information precisely to the person who would be interested in a performance video in the first place. Some people would rather pretend gaming PC's don't exist though.
I see DF keeps comparing a $2000 PC with a $400 console..... LOL!
For $490 you can get 1080P Ultra 60 FPS with vsync turned on, and more with Vsync off.
http://pcpartpicker.com/list/NPPNvV
(If you stand the Windows 10 unregistrated text, otherwise add $30 on some keyselling site)
So just cause they use a $2000 doesnt mean you have to spend all that money to get BF1 running nicely.
add a good screen, keyboard, mouse, and speakers and you will see the price jump above $600.
I see DF keeps comparing a $2000 PC with a $400 console..... LOL!
For $490 you can get 1080P Ultra 60 FPS with vsync turned on, and more with Vsync off.
http://pcpartpicker.com/list/NPPNvV
(If you stand the Windows 10 unregistrated text, otherwise add $30 on some keyselling site)
So just cause they use a $2000 doesnt mean you have to spend all that money to get BF1 running nicely.
add a good screen, keyboard, mouse, and speakers and you will see the price jump above $600.
remember to add the cost of a good tv to the ps4
They have also been adamant (Richard especially) at how much of a value PS4 Pro is at $400. The usual filth around here predictably and repeatedly ignore that fact.
PS4 Pro users are getting high (SSR and Terrain Quality on Medium) at 1440p (or higher) at 60ish fps for 399.
I not here to say which is better. But both have their qualities. Also, the checkerboard rendering looks amazing on BF 1.
Sadly not that great on Tomb Raider in fast paced action scenes. I wonder what Nixxes has done wrong (or perhaps it's just that terrible engine created from Crystal Dynamics. Call of Duty also looks great with checkerboard rendering)
For $490 you can get 1080P Ultra 60 FPS with vsync turned on, and more with Vsync off.
http://pcpartpicker.com/list/NPPNvV
(If you stand the Windows 10 unregistrated text, otherwise add $30 on some keyselling site)
So just cause they use a $2000 doesnt mean you have to spend all that money to get BF1 running nicely.