You make for some articulate posts but your criticism is unfair when the very foundation of your argument and posts for god knows how long it's been now is that this was a platform for anti consumerism. I keep thinking you're in on your own joke and you understand what anti-consumerism is but with every post, I begin to understand just how serious you take yourself and it's scary to be quite honest with you.
Look, if you're going to throw those words around and use your own definition, at least clearly state what that definition is because as it stands, there is no merit to your argument.
Are you suggesting that Microsoft is taking or controlling consumer choice when they opt for their ecosystem (an ecosystem,I might add, that everyone has enough information to make an informed decision before they opt into) or are you implying that a Microsoft is showcasing a movement to discourage consumption for social and environmental reasons (in which case how is that possible if you have a physical console and, philosophically, how is that even bad?)
Please explain to me this "campaign of misinformation" that only a minor group of gamers on this site is onto. If you're going to make a strong accusation of intent, you should be able to document with evidence.
Anti-consumerism:
-The initial DRM debacle and their stance toward the ownership of games.
-Their continued insistence on hiding services behind a paywall, as well as their continued insistence on shoving ads on you.
-The susceptibility of Kinect to be used as part of a "NU Ad" marketing campaign aimed at gathering data about you and catering ads exclusively toward you.
-Arguably the pricepoint of the system itself, in comparison to the PS4.
As for misinformation:
-Their inability to respond to damaging, detailed leaks that basically laid out the system (warts and all) before its May unveiling.
-The initial debacle after the official reveal concerning DRM and subsequent "clarifications."
-"If you're focused on backwards compatibility you're truly backwards."
-The "power of the cloud" bullshit they fed us for months.
-The current employment of buzzfeed nonsense terminology like "balance" and usage of Digital Foundry as mouthpieces to mask the technological shortcomings of the XBO when in reality, they just got caught with their pants down.
Some of these issues have been alleviated, de-emphasized, or rectified, but the point is that MS has constantly and consistently chosen to obfuscate instead of clarify as a matter of policy. Taken together, you can gather where they stand on their respect for consumers.
As for your comment about consumers having choice because they can "opt in" if they so choose, I think that largely misses the point. A business transaction can still be unconscionable, even if there's the illusion of consumer choice.