Azurro
Banned
Hey, despite you must be pissed off about it, it is worth reading a bit of back and forth with details for others in the thread and as future reference. I get why people may use ignore lists, but I would think it is best to let the discussion progress if you are willing to write lengthier pieces with your perspective on it too.
Yeah, it would actually be interesting to know from someone in MS or Sony how their backwards compatibility works from a software point of view.
I know in the case of the PS5, some of the PS4 functions were implemented in hw for bc, but from a software stack point of view, I'd love to know what kind of layers are between the original PS4/Xbox One game and the new console.
He, Phrixotrichus, offered no details or information to the conversation just claims of others being wrong about Xbox emulation(or more specifically that it wasn't emulation) and claiming others were spouting nonsense without pointing out how or in what way they were wrong or the correction information. Also while making unsubstantiated claims of being a software architect without backing that up with knowledgeable information. When I asked him to please elaborate or discussed how so or in what way or to provide details or information, he ignored the request and only proceeded to provide more insults.
I would have taken his claim of being a architect at face value if he would have provided some form of insight and info, in fact, it would have been appreciated, but alas....nothing of the kind.
I don't even care really if he made that up, along as he would provide useful info instead of just insults and generalized criticisms and claims without any elaboration as to why or how so. Saying that another is wrong without explanation other to say, you just are and I'm an expert does nothing for this conversation.
You are being pretty abrasive and stand off ish though, that doesn't lead to a good discussion. If he has a perspective, then I'd like to read it.
Last edited: