Refreshment.01
Member
Think that being hasty with judgement is leading you into reaching the wrong conclusions in various aspects. That last statement is not what i meant in the post.
i also consider that painting the consumer that choses Nintendo creations with a broad stroke as you are doing in the thread is not a proper assesment of reality. The fair thing to say is that videogame consumers in general tend to be quiet tolerant to exploitative practices from companies and are quite malleable. "Pay to online play, pay to win, frivolous or questioanble DLC, Loot boxes, etc. Is not something that we should be piggeon holing an specific platform user base for supporting.
That is something that TheDuskwalker is bringing up, not refreshment. i mentioned the 57 simply because it is Gamestop asking price for a preowned copy, which later we learned is how you got the game. What is new to us now in the thread is that the store discount and coupon was specifically to preowned copies. So without the poster stating it, is impossible to know these facts.
The thing is there's no need to let any "finger or fist to be stick up there". This is not a prostate exam or getting paid for a pornographic carreer. Hands are not being forced here, so why not take the "high road" to reach our goals?TheDuskwalker said:
The behavior, in this case the act of getting a game we are heavily critisizing for it's price, ends up being rather peculiar because either if bought new or used from gamestop is at odds with the stance in the thread and ends up not contributing to solve the "problem" we wish to erradicate.
More over one of the reasons the price is being criticized is because is for a 4 year old game so after all this time what was exactly the haste to get it? Just waiting some more allows a person to get the game used at a better price thus not supporting shady Gamestop practices and Nintendo's price inflation.
