• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Do you believe aliens visit Earth?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wormdundee said:
If he was making some crazy statement about lizard men trying to make us infertile he would be mocked as well.

It's entertaining to mock absurdly silly beliefs. Society has been conditioned for decades to give religion special leeway for believing absurd things, so you're the 'bad guy' if you mock them for it even though it's really no different than various other crazy things.

Personally I wouldn't mock that person's belief unless they were using it in some debate/argument.

You guys can have your little circle jerk, just realize the guy you are mocking probably isn't going to respond, and realizes that his belief is based on faith.
 
Obsessed said:
Personally I wouldn't mock that person's belief unless they were using it in some debate/argument.

At the end of the day, you, me, and everyone else likely believes in 75% fallacious shit anyway. People discredit the extent to which truth and belief are cognitively the same thing.
 
Wormdundee said:
If he was making some crazy statement about lizard men trying to make us infertile he would be mocked as well.

It's entertaining to mock absurdly silly beliefs. Society has been conditioned for decades to give religion special leeway for believing absurd things, so you're the 'bad guy' if you mock them for it even though it's really no different than various other crazy things.
There is a difference between randomly adopting a crazy conspiracy theory about lizard people, and accepting a belief system instilled in you by your family and community and which has been passed on for countless generations. Many of the greatest minds in human history did the same. It's far less absurd for a person to have traditional religious views than it is for them to to believe in lizard people. If you were half as intelligent as you pretend to be, you'd realize that the situation is too nuanced for you simply use the content of beliefs to equivocate them.

You talk of "leeway" as if you are allowing some transgression against you to go unchallenged. "Leeway", as if it is your place, no, your duty to chase down and mock anyone that you detect believes things the overwhelming majority of the human race still believes.

Your compulsion to confront and ridicule these people, placing no value in maturity, civility, or context, speaks strongly to you having some insecurities of your own that you use this sort of mockery to cope with.

Grow the fuck up, and stop making a crusade of your atheist enlightenment that you care far more about than anyone else does.
 
LaserBuddha said:
There is a difference between randomly adopting a crazy conspiracy theory about lizard people, and accepting a belief system instilled in you by your family and community and which has been passed on for countless generations. Many of the greatest minds in human history did the same. It's far less absurd for a person to have traditional religious views than it is for them to to believe in lizard people. If you were half as intelligent as you pretend to be, you'd realize that the situation is too nuanced for you simply use the content of beliefs to equivocate them.

You talk of "leeway" as if you are allowing some transgression against you to go unchallenged. "Leeway", as if it is your place, no, your duty to chase down and mock anyone that you detect believes things the overwhelming majority of the human race still believes.

Your compulsion to confront and ridicule these people, placing no value in maturity, civility, or context, speaks strongly to you having some insecurities of your own that you use this sort of mockery to cope with.

Grow the fuck up, and stop making a crusade of your atheist enlightenment that you care far more about than anyone else does.
The origins or the social context of a belief system have nothing to do with whether or not the belief is true.

So what if was taught to him by his parents? So what if billions of people believe it?

Every criticism you have of him, is exactly the point he was trying to make. If you attack someone for such absurd beliefs, you see what happens, someone like you posts something like that.

Lizard people are so far removed from an undead Jew right? A giant boat that carried all these animals? It's apologists like yourself that allow people who hold these beliefs to coast through life without ever having them critically questioned.

Even though he was discussing Rocker's beliefs and not him as a person, you come in with a slew of ad hominem attacks about his intelligence and ego. So why don't you grow the fuck up.
 
ColonialRaptor said:
Have you read this book? Is it as good as it sounds in that summary? If so... can I bought it on the eBook store for my iPhone? If so I'll buy it right now.
Yes I've read it cover to cover, and it's fascinating. I'd recommend it to anyone, even the most die hard skeptics.

Not sure about it's e-book availability though.

Edit: yes it's on iBook, search for author Leslie Kean. It's $13.
 
MuseManMike said:
The origins or the social context of a belief system have nothing to do with whether or not the belief is true.
As soon as I read this part I realized that you missed the entire fucking point of my post.
 
LaserBuddha said:
As soon as I read this part I realized that you missed the entire fucking point of my post.
Good thing that was my entire post with no elaboration of what you didn't understand of Wormdundee's post.
 
Neuromancer said:
Yes I've read it cover to cover, and it's fascinating. I'd recommend it to anyone, even the most die hard skeptics.

Not sure about it's e-book availability though.

Edit: yes it's on iBook, search for author Leslie Kean. It's $13.

My god... Apple's iBook interface for finding books is WOEFUL, i'm having trouble finding it.

I would buy it on Kindle but I don't want to use Amazon's system to read it, I like Apple's book interface... GAH this is so frustrating, I simply can't find it in their store... SO ANNOYING!
 
MuseManMike said:
It's apologists like yourself that allow people who hold these beliefs to coast through life without ever having them critically questioned.

Considering the poster in question outright stated his beliefs were based on faith I think critically questioning his beliefs is going to accomplish nothing. You and the other posters weren't having a debate, you were having a good ol'fashioned circle jerk.
 
Obsessed said:
Considering the poster in question outright stated his beliefs were based on faith I think critically questioning his beliefs is going to accomplish nothing. You and the other posters weren't having a debate, you were having a good ol'fashioned circle jerk.
Before I respond, do you agree with him? About no aliens and God's will?
 
ColonialRaptor said:
My god... Apple's iBook interface for finding books is WOEFUL, i'm having trouble finding it.

I would buy it on Kindle but I don't want to use Amazon's system to read it, I like Apple's book interface... GAH this is so frustrating, I simply can't find it in their store... SO ANNOYING!

The only way I seem to be able to find that book is via the App Store and it seems to be an AudioBook version.

I've never used an Audiobook before... might be interesting to try, I'm certainly keen to check this out that's for sure, but I don't know if that is the way to go or not. I could just buy the Kindle version and read it myself at my own pace, but DAMMIT I don't want the kindle version.

SCHIET.
 
MuseManMike said:
Before I respond, do you agree with him? About no aliens and God's will?

No. I'm an atheist.

As for aliens, statistically there is other life out there. However, I need physical evidence before I believe aliens have visited Earth. If a global conspiracy is covering it up well... I guess I won't ever get the evidence I require.
 
Would be cool if it was true, even if they came to destroy us and enslave the planet. It would make for a good weekend i guess.
 
The way I see it, we'll know aliens exist when David Attenborough disappears inexplicably. Then, thanks to some DVDs from the BBC, and David's soothing voice, everything there is to know about earth will be known by the aliens.

Edit: Seriously though, I just watched the final episode of Earth: Power of the planet, and Iain Stewart talks about the Rare Earth Hypothesis which explains how, while life is fairly easy to create and life is most likely found everywhere in the universe, Earth's conditions were favourable to trigger the evolution of multicellular organisms.

I am not insinuating that we are the only multicellular creature in the whole Universe, just that while life may be found on many planets in many galaxies, the conditions for sentient spaceship-building lifeforms may be just a tad rarer.
 
Neuromancer said:
If I had to bet either on your God or aliens, I'd put everything I had on aliens.

To those wondering why this man's odds are placed as such, it is because the chances of extraterrestrial life in a universe of trillions of stars is very good. The chances of there existing one of the countless supernatural beings invented by the mind of homo sapiens is nil.


Orayn said:
shitstorm.jpg

Why did you have to bring religion into this?

Because it is valid? However infinitesimal the chances are of a super advanced alien civilization being aware of Earth's existence, if by that chance they did exist, I can see why they might consider it necessary to have a "prime directive" (like Star Trek's regarding achievement of warp travel). It might state that interfering with the advancement of a civilization is out of the question if say, anything other than a tiny minority of the local population still believe in entities and concepts with absolutely zero evidence to corroborate them. Guess what? Like 4 BILLION humans are abrahamic theists, let alone just "spiritual".

Growth of a civilization can be measured by how much knowledge it has accumulated about it's universe, from the micro to macro ends of the scale. Organized religion is at best the ignorance of knowledge, and at worst the redaction of knowledge.
 
Nah, no aliens on Earth. I belive there's other life in the galaxy, or at leat in the universe but no aliens have visited Earth while humans have walked it. Any starship capable of interstellar crossing can be spotted far, far away very likely.
But as i said, as long as humans have existes. Who knows what happened before that? If aliens have visited, they left no traces.
 
Gah, I'm so into Aliens/universe again now.

I'd pay all the money in the world to actually see a UFO and confirm it's out of this world. It would basically be (for me) the deciding fact that this life we live has a point and it is truly awesome.

Butttt same if Jesus came down and talked with me or Harry Potter showed me magic. But I have more faith in the Alien thing.
 
Death Dealer said:
The stealth fighter was operational for almost a decade before anyone in the public knew about it.

It was operational for 5 years prior to public disclosure. This is also not even close to comparable to what we are talking about here, considering that many people involved in the project would not even know why this was a "special" aircraft - people shipping fuel don't know it's being burned by a stealth fighter, the engines were ordinary aircraft engines manufactured by people who didn't know what it was being used for, and only a limited number of engineers and factory workers would even see the thing to know that it was weird. Of these, only the engineers knew exactly why it was the shape it was. Most of it's systems were off-the-shelf parts, and the ones that were custom usually were only tangentially related to it's stealth capability (i.e. high precision inertial navigation).

Regardless of the fact that it wasn't publicly acknowledged by the government for the five years, there are several other key differences. Firstly, the idea that the government was operating stealth aircraft was widely speculated in military enthusiast circles, and some of this was almost assuredly caused by internal leaks. To give you an example, Tom Clancy's Red Storm Rising, published 1986 (two years prior to disclosure), featured the United States operating radar-stealthed aircraft. The same year, there was a model-aircraft set released called the "F19 Stealth Fighter". The idea that the F-19 designation (which was, in reality, skipped, most likely a design for a fighter that never left the drawing board) referred to a stealth aircraft caught on from here, and in '88 prior to disclosure we got a videogame called "F19 Stealth Fighter". Again, the same year, also prior to disclosure, they released a G.I. Joe toy called the "F19 Ghost Rider", also a stealth fighter.

Additionally, outside of military enthusiasts, the existence of a stealth fighter is of practically no interest. The public doesn't really care, and for the people involved with the project, this is an important military secret to keep.

A far better example of large scale secret keeping is the Manhattan Project, which involved far more people, and in fact was basically a city constructed for the purpose of developing and building an atom bomb. But this only lasted around half a decade as well before public disclosure, and this took place during wartime (with everybody fully onboard with the project and paranoid that letting secrets out could help the axis win).

By contrast, the existence of aliens involves orders of magnitude more people in a position to know it than either of these two projects. It is a phenomenon that is in the public's face (F117's weren't abducting people, performing flyovers and dicking around with other pilots for decades), one for which the public is extremely interested, one which involves practically every major government (UFO sightings are not USA exclusive, by any means), and one which, I must emphasize, they do not benefit by keeping secret.

Nobody claimed that governments can't have secrets, our position is rather that large scale secrets involving so many governments and so many people are practically infeasible to maintain for any notable length of time, even if they want to. The larger the conspiracy gets the harder it is to keep a lid on it. Indeed, the fact that you're claiming that there's so much evidence and that we know that they're real and that people have spoken out is direct evidence that if there was a conspiracy to hide the existence of aliens, it has failed, and given the number of people who already believe they are real, serves no functional purpose anymore, even if it once did.

I always have to laugh out loud when people try and compare the topic of UFOs/Aliens to crap like astology or ghosts. It's ridiculous. How many classified documents concerning ghosts has the NSA gone to court to protect from revealing ? Has a ghost ever been captured on multiple radars ? Has the US Govt ever scrambled fighters to intercept ghosts?

Hey, I know it's hard to respond to the central point someone is making rather than attacking straw men, but could you try? These are examples of mass delusions. They are proof that large numbers of people absolutely can be fooled, can be wrong about things regardless of how many people believe it or how strongly they believe it or how many people claim to have seen it or how much evidence they claim to have of it.

This may stun you, but it's possible to disagree with my conclusions while not being required to literally debunk everything I say. For example, what I said there was 100% true; people are frequently deluded, on large scales, and think they saw stuff that never really happened. This is true regardless of whether or not you believe aliens are visiting earth in flying saucers.

As it so happens, the United States government absolutely did investigate psychic phenomena.

That's BS. There were thousands of UFO sightings during WW2, on both sides.

ORLY? I'm not even going to bother checking to see whether your source is valid or not, or whether you're quote mining and taking things out of context or not (and believe me, I've had UFO enthusiasts tell me some bloody great whoppers in the past), because it matters little anyway since the earliest example of a flying saucer in Science Fiction appeared in 1911, and SciFi pulp was commonplace even before the second world war.

I do hope you're not deliberately obfuscating the line between "something showed up on the radar and we didn't know what it was" with "we saw aliens".
 
I definitely believe in other life out there.

The universe is so vast it doesn't make sense that earth is the only planet with living organisms.

As for if they've visited earth, I say probably not.
 
surly said:
I live about 3 miles from Cannock Chase.

I believe that aliens almost certainly exist, but I don't believe that they are visiting Earth.
Where do you live? I went to college in Stafford, that's about three miles I think.
 
SalsaShark said:
shit, your insightful post sure just changed everything he believed in all his life! and only in 2 seconds!

seriously man, just respect and shutup, this aint a religion thread
Why cant you respect his right to type what he wants??
 
I think that it's crazy to think it's not possible. I don't know if it did happen or not because we don't have proof but there's a limit before insulting intelligence...

First, if the universe is infinite, there's an infinite number of places where life can be. At every instant, there is life that is born and life that dies. What does this mean? It means it's not possible to calculate how advanced we are as beings. We might be ahead and we might be a total prehistorical sub-lifeform. Saying stuff like "oh no, it's possible they come here" is really stupid because we would need to know the limits of an infinite of different lifeforms that are at all the different infinite stages of evolution. This is retarded human arrogance. Chances are that we are wrong. Maths are against us here. Just by this simple logic here, I have the accept the possibility aliens can come here or might have come here before.

Secondo, when you start reading on the subject, there's so many documentation out there about what people supposedly saw, supposedly witnessed, there so many historical documents too that at some point you can't ditch billions and billions of people through history and now as crazy hallucinating clowns. Chances are that, here again, probabilities are against us. There are some people that truly witnessed something alien.
 
I don't want anything to do with any alien intelligence that actually wanted to visit us bunch of psychotic, short term thinking morons.
 
Well I watched all the interviews in that Disclosure Project thing, and it's certainly some compelling and convincing testimony.

If everything they're saying is true then the US government has absolute proof in their hands... it's just a matter of getting them to release it.

Also, the fact that they've reverse engineered zero point energy and an anti gravity drive that is capable of FTL travel... well that seems a bit bullshit to me, so it kind of gives me the feeling that the whole thing is bullshit.

But where do you find so many ex servicemen to say all of this shit so convincingly... how can they all be so deluded?

Unfortunately, I don't know whether I can believe any of them or not... if it was me, I'd be way more excited, and they seem to just be telling some every day yarn like when they went down to the super market..

I'm gonna read that book next, hopefully that will be a little better.
 
ColonialRaptor said:
Also, the fact that they've reverse engineered zero point energy and an anti gravity drive that is capable of FTL travel... well that seems a bit bullshit to me, so it kind of gives me the feeling that the whole thing is bullshit.
XPuN1.jpg
 
ColonialRaptor said:
Also, the fact that they've reverse engineered zero point energy and an anti gravity drive that is capable of FTL travel... well that seems a bit bullshit to me, so it kind of gives me the feeling that the whole thing is bullshit.

Zero Point Energy claims are especially amusing since ZPE cannot possibly be harvested, by definition. If energy can be taken from a system, then the system was not at zero-point (zero-point being defined as the lowest possible energy a system can contain). Saying you're generating power by extracting zero point energy is quite literally saying you have constructed an engine that runs by not having any fuel.

The other thread we've had recently should be enough to explain why claims of an FTL drive are bollocks, but for the true believer none of this will ever convince them otherwise.

But where do you find so many ex servicemen to say all of this shit so convincingly... how can they all be so deluded?

One should expect that servicemen are deluded at the same rate that average people are. There are millions of service people around the world just in English speaking countries, so do the math.
 
BravesCountry said:
Drakes Equation!! astronomy 101.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drake_equation

Now as for whether they have visited us or not..not likely. Someone would have captured a pic or video on their smartphone by now
Yeah. It seems as cameras became more widely used (phones, compact point-and-shoot) we have fewer UFO sightings. That can't be coincidence.

I believe in intelligent extraterrestrial life (aliens) but I don't think they ever visited this planet. Why would they want to anyway?
 
ThoseDeafMutes said:
Zero Point Energy claims are especially amusing since ZPE cannot possibly be harvested, by definition. If energy can be taken from a system, then the system was not at zero-point (zero-point being defined as the lowest possible energy a system can contain). Saying you're generating power by extracting zero point energy is quite literally saying you have constructed an engine that runs by not having any fuel.

The other thread we've had recently should be enough to explain why claims of an FTL drive are bollocks, but for the true believer none of this will ever convince them otherwise.

One should expect that servicemen are deluded at the same rate that average people are. There are millions of service people around the world just in English speaking countries, so do the math.
The over-unity claims aren't strictly zero point energy by my understanding of it.

Superluminal travel is certainly an additional road block in the story.

Delusion doesn't tend to be shared though I believe. It would seem quite likely you'd have hundreds of American's who are both insane and ex-military, but I don't see why their stories would also align. It's much more likely they are sane, and believe the events took place but there is a whole other explanation for the events.
 
StuBurns said:
The over-unity claims aren't strictly zero point energy by my understanding of it.

Superluminal travel is certainly an additional road block in the story.

If they are claiming that they have free-energy devices, then it's auto-bullshit because of thermodynamics.


Delusion doesn't tend to be shared though I believe. It would seem quite likely you'd have hundreds of American's who are both insane and ex-military, but I don't see why their stories would also align. It's much more likely they are sane, and believe the events took place but there is a whole other explanation for the events.

Delusion doesn't necessarily imply insanity. When you say "you're deluded" you don't necessarily mean it in the technical psychological sense either (where it means a belief that is maintained in the face of direct, contradictory evidence, and is the result of some illness). Assuming these claims are false (and these specific ones regarding free energy, ftl etc certainly are, although that does not by extension mean all claims of alien sightings are of course), it is to be something along the lines of a Big Foot or Lock Ness Monster, where some people are playing along for a laugh, some do it to get attention, and some people genuinely believe that it's real (for one reason or another).

Keep in mind that many people who genuinely are mentally ill will latch on to conspiracies they have heard from somewhere else, so the fact that there are multiple people claiming the same thing is only significant in terms of "it can't just be crazy people" if we can demonstrate that there was no opportunity for one person to start the story, and then the others to hear it and repeat it. People changing their story and remembering things that never happened is a demonstrated psychological phenomena when you lock witnesses to some event in a room together and they talk to each other.
 
ThoseDeafMutes said:
If they are claiming that they have free-energy devices, then it's auto-bullshit because of thermodynamics.
That seems like an exceptional arrogant position to take. If you literally believe because it's not in line with current scientific theory it can't possibly be accurate, I don't think you're someone I care to discuss it with.
 
If aliens are real, they could have some free energy stuff and FTL.Who knows what could be learned and made if you have thousands years older tech.I like the idea that first contact will be by self replicating robots first,because it is just easier that way.

Although, that new graphene material that makes steel look like paper in strength,was first theorized in 1947,same time as Roswell crash.
 
StuBurns said:
That seems like an exceptional arrogant position to take. If you literally believe because it's not in line with current scientific theory it can't possibly be accurate, I don't think you're someone I care to discuss it with.

If you think that thermodynamics is something that could possibly be violated, then I return the sentiment. It is the most fundamental set of principles in the entirety of science, more than relativity, more than gravity, more than evolution. It is the scientific formulation of the tautology 1 = 1; 1 joule of energy is 1 joule of energy, and does the work of 1 joule of energy. If there can be 1 joule in a system and you can extract 2 joules, then absolutely nothing makes any sense, and physicists may as well retrain to go into a more profitable line of work, because they have just stepped out into planet fuck, population: idiots.
 
ThoseDeafMutes said:
If you think that thermodynamics is something that could possibly be violated, then I return the sentiment. It is the most fundamental set of principles in the entirety of science, more than relativity, more than gravity, more than evolution. It is the scientific formulation of the tautology 1 = 1; 1 joule of energy is 1 joule of energy, and does the work of 1 joule of energy. If there can be 1 joule in a system and you can extract 2 joules, then absolutely nothing makes any sense, and physicists may as well retrain to go into a more profitable line of work, because they have just stepped out into planet fuck, population: idiots.
What if you extract it from different dimension?
 
Norml said:
What if you extract it from different dimension?

Then you don't have a free energy device, you are simply tapping energy from elsewhere, which will have its reserves depleted in accordance with thermodynamics. Assuming these "different dimensions" actually exist.

StuBurns said:
Excellent.

What I find really amusing here is that you agreed that their claims to FTL travel cast doubt on their story, but apparently their perpetual motion machines of the first order did not.
 
ThoseDeafMutes said:
Then you don't have a free energy device, you are simply tapping energy from elsewhere, which will have its reserves depleted in accordance with thermodynamics. Assuming these "different dimensions" actually exist.
But what if that doesn't apply there,and could be with all laws being different,you can't be certain about it.Either way, would still be free in a sense as it doesn't affect anything near you.
 
ThoseDeafMutes said:
What I find really amusing here is that you agreed that their claims to FTL travel cast doubt on their story, but apparently their perpetual motion machines of the first order did not.
I don't say that, of course it makes the story incredibly unlikely (or rather it would if that was exactly what they claimed, and it's not, which I've already said). I just think someone who refuses to comprehend human inaccuracy on the subject is narrow minded and thus a poor fit for the discussion.
 
StuBurns said:
I don't say that, of course it makes the story incredibly unlikely (or rather it would if that was exactly what they claimed, and it's not, which I've already said). I just think someone who refuses to comprehend human inaccuracy on the subject is narrow minded and thus a poor fit for the discussion.
Who is fit for the discussion? Someone who rejects the scientific consensus?
 
MuseManMike said:
Who is fit for the discussion? Someone who rejects the scientific consensus?
Someone who is open to the possibility of contemporary theory being incorrect, which is most people I'd say.

From the documentary they don't claim there is strict zero point energy harnessing machines. They do however claim FTL travel is possible. Although they don't specifically address if it's literally faster than light, or some sort of wormhole or whatever.
 
Norml said:
But what if that doesn't apply there,and could be with all laws being different,you can't be certain about it.Either way, would still be free in a sense as it doesn't affect anything near you.

Dimensions don't work the way you seem to think they do. If I stand to the left of where I am currently standing, I have shifted through a spatial and time dimension to get there, yet the laws of physics are exactly the same. If there is a fourth spatial dimension (i.e. not time), and I have gathered my energy from another 3+1D universe separated along this 4th one, then it is exactly like the above example, taking place in the same universe even though it's somewhere that is "inaccessible".

But I already know where your line of questioning is going, you'll keep throwing other things out there, what if X, what if Y, blah blah. What if there is another universe! But every unjustified assumption takes you further away from reality into crazy town. You may as well be asking things like "but what if there is another universe where 1 + 1 = 8?", for all the good it is doing you. What if the aliens have a machine that blarnocks the zeeluntang?


StuBurns said:
I just think someone who refuses to comprehend human inaccuracy on the subject is narrow minded and thus a poor fit for the discussion.

This isn't like they are talking about some unknown fringe of science, or some inaccurate theory we're trying to replace. This is not only well mapped territory, it's the sanity check that physicists use to make sure their theories are consistent with reality. The only doubt it is possible to have about thermodynamics being real is the vaguest of metaphysical doubts, the sort where you cannot prove anything except cognito ergo sum. I mentioned that this is utterly foundational before, and I wasn't joking or exaggerating, your objections are less scientifically sound than evolution denial. I'm not saying that to insult you, that's genuinely the closest analogy I can draw here.


StuBurns said:
From the documentary they don't claim there is strict zero point energy harnessing machines. They do however claim FTL travel is possible. Although they don't specifically address if it's literally faster than light, or some sort of wormhole or whatever.

As was addressed in the FTL thread, wormholes are just as bad as any other method of achieving FTL travel regarding violations of causality and FTL / Time travel equivalence.
 
tarius1210 said:
Yeah. It seems as cameras became more widely used (phones, compact point-and-shoot) we have fewer UFO sightings. That can't be coincidence.

I believe in intelligent extraterrestrial life (aliens) but I don't think they ever visited this planet. Why would they want to anyway?
Throwaway cameras have been around for a while tbf and phones, well everyones looking down instead of at the sky ;)
 
Never seen an UFO but I do believe that there must be some kind of aliens that have visited earth or will in the future.
 
This thread is evidence as to why aliens have never visited Earth or why they have visited and are never coming back.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom