I really don't want to up my pledge...
Neither do I, but I love TLJ so much that if TLJH is anything even remotely resembling an HD version of the game I will have no choice.
Nice post, I'm bumping it to the new page. Yes, the transition to 3D was mostly very awkward for the adventure genre in late 90s/early 00s. Personally, I really like the first person adventure genre like Uru or Penumbra. There's something really immersive about the perspective when you focus on interacting with the world and not violence.Not sure I agree. A large part of what actually killed them was that designers tried to shoehorn 3D elements and action sequences into them in an attempt to 'make them modern' and 'expand the audienced' in order to get them greenlit for development. Dreamfall suffered from this, but it happend to other notable series as well, such as Monkey Island and Broken Sword. Early prototypes of Space Quest 7 also suggested this direction before it was cancelled (years later an Action Platformer using the SQ franchise was apparently in production for Xbox for a while, there are concept art out there that was leaked.)
One of the few games that actually had a decent transition was Gabriel Knight 3, but the game has not aged well (unlike a lot of 90s 2D adventure games). That was probably another thing that killed Adventure games for the existing audience. They were used to gorgeous 2D art, the original Broken Sword still looks very nice today, Monkey Island 1, 2 and 3 as well, but suddenly the only adventures were these butt ugly abominations. For me personally it was a huge turn off. It took me forever to get around to play GK3. I remember buying Simon 3D the moment it came out because I loved the first 2, only to be shocked at how ugly it was. Broken Sword 3 was a mess of box moving and slow walking. In short, weak attempts at 'revitalising' the genre, was what really killed it.
The audience for adventure games didn't really shrink, but it didn't grow either, certainly not in the pace of other genres, notably FPS, so these games became less attractive to fund for publishers which prompted all these weak attempts. However the fact that there was and is an audience for classic 2D adventure games should be very evident from the revival they have seen in the last few years.
This new TLJ game look gorgeous, and I have no qualms backing it, however to me personally the 'open world exploration' that they talk about here is not a selling point for an adventure. I believe in these guys, since I know they can deliver a solid experience, but if these were untested developers, this would probably put me in a 'wait and see' mode.
So TLJH is Home ... interesting!
I'd like them to focus ALL their efforts first and foremost on making the best Dreamfall Chapters game they can make before giving us goals for HD remakes.
Giving a 2 million dollar stretch goal when you haven't even reached your original goal of $850,000 yet seems kinda greedy.
Giving a 2 million dollar stretch goal when you haven't even reached your original goal of $850,000 yet seems kinda greedy.
![]()
hmm ...
They mainly just need to raise the corners of her mouth a bit. She looks extra frowny in her neutral expression, especially when looked at from a low angle which they've shown her from a lot.At first I was okay with the redesign. But now looking at the prototype in action, I don't really like the new Zoe. Hopefully once the game is finished the character looks better.
They mainly just need to raise the corners of her mouth a bit. She looks extra frowny in her neutral expression, especially when looked at from a low angle which they've shown her from a lot.
According to gamers, everything is greedy when known developers use kick starter.
That would be going to far, though they may have been some questionable cases.
But if you're already begging people for money, you could at least show some modesty and wait for such huge goals until you're a little closer to that goal than they are now (maybe around 1.5 million).
Oh well, not that it matters much. But I found it a bit strange when I got that email.
At the pace it's slowing down they won't hit 1.5 until near the end if they even hit it at all. So announcing a 2 million goal now may get new people to get a higher tier then they would normally if 1.5 was the only ceiling they were given.But if you're already begging people for money, you could at least show some modesty and wait for such huge goals until you're a little closer to that goal than they are now (maybe around 1.5 million).
Oh well, not that it matters much. But I found it a bit strange when I got that email.
2) Anna asked: Do you have any plans to make The Longest Journey remake somewhere in the future? One that would introduce better graphics, technicalties, maybe even expand the story?
Ragnar Tornquist said:I don't think so. We would prefer to spend our time telling new stories. Also, Red Thread doesn't have the rights.
At the pace it's slowing down they won't hit 1.5 until near the end if they even hit it at all. So announcing a 2 million goal now may get new people to get a higher tier then they would normally if 1.5 was the only ceiling they were given.
$800k reached
The de-adventurefying/action elements thing was really after the genre was already left for dead. I'm talking about that transitional period around the time everything was starting to go 3D, like 1995 to 1998. This is when adventure games should have been asking "How can 3D make our games better?"Not sure I agree. A large part of what actually killed them was that designers tried to shoehorn 3D elements and action sequences into them in an attempt to 'make them modern' and 'expand the audienced' in order to get them greenlit for development. Dreamfall suffered from this, but it happend to other notable series as well, such as Monkey Island and Broken Sword.
But other genres all went through this too, to different extents. Early 3D was pretty ugly across the board. But those games made up for it by offering an experience that was in some way transformed or made new, so people tolerated the uglier look for the newness that came with it.That was probably another thing that killed Adventure games for the existing audience. They were used to gorgeous 2D art, the original Broken Sword still looks very nice today, Monkey Island 1, 2 and 3 as well, but suddenly the only adventures were these butt ugly abominations.
So rather than actually exploring how to evolve the genre, you think they would have been saved by just staying 2D? The operative word here is "weak attempts." I think we needed people to approach this problem differently. And we still do. I'm really glad Dreamfall Chapters wont be stuck in the 90s. You can still be an adventure game without a scripted camera and tiny sets.In short, weak attempts at 'revitalising' the genre, was what really killed it.
I'm guessing this is the stretch goal for translation into Spanish and some other languages.Ah, Cortez. "Mystery is important señorita."
This is looking great!
USB key design, featuring Wonkers the Watilla
By popular request, here is a preview of the USB key that comes with some of the physical tiers.
We can't guarantee that the final version will look exactly like this, but we will try our best! After all, this cherished character many of you may recognise from Dreamfall: The Longest Journey is a natural fit for a USB key:
![]()
Wonkers can hold up to 16GB of data, and comes as part of the $350, $500 and $750 physical tiers.
Rewatching the gameplay update, does anyone else feel like Martin is overselling things just a bit?
![]()
hmm ...
The de-adventurefying/action elements thing was really after the genre was already left for dead. I'm talking about that transitional period around the time everything was starting to go 3D, like 1995 to 1998. This is when adventure games should have been asking "How can 3D make our games better?"
That's the part of this I don't think you're getting. Yes, games like Escape from Monkey Island and Grim Fandango went 3D, but like you said, it was shoehorned, and superficial. The 3D didn't add anything to the formula except awkward controls. They were worse.
But it didn't HAVE to be that way. If they embraced 3D as a part of the gameplay, I think audiences would have seen it as a step forward, rather than a step back, in the same way they did with other genres.
But other genres all went through this too, to different extents. Early 3D was pretty ugly across the board. But those games made up for it by offering an experience that was in some way transformed or made new, so people tolerated the uglier look for the newness that came with it.
Adventure games never answered the question of how 3D can make them better. Under a Killing Moon and its sequels were literally the ONLY ones during that critical time period that were fundamentally different, and couldn't have just as easily been 2D, because you had to look under and around things for clues and the 3D navigation was actually part of the gameplay.
Interestingly 2D adventures did kinda survive in Europe. Not amazingly strong and vibrant, but enough to keep the community alive. The old big publishers, such as Sierra, Lucasarts etc dropped it, not because the games sold less, but because the bar had moved and games needed to sell even more to stay relevant compared to FPS shooters and other competing genres.So rather than actually exploring how to evolve the genre, you think they would have been saved by just staying 2D? The operative word here is "weak attempts." I think we needed people to approach this problem differently. And we still do. I'm really glad Dreamfall Chapters wont be stuck in the 90s. You can still be an adventure game without a scripted camera and tiny sets.
Does anyone know what engine they are using? Is it something in-house?