• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

EA has no titles in development for Wii U

Second class citizens? Please. BLOPS Wii U was 5 days late on the Wii U. Had equal if not better graphical quality

When COD was released every Wii U basher said it was the worst version - a screenshot of a Wii U video with a jaggy shadow in it, the same guy spamming 50 posts about how the frame rate was terrible, etc.

But now, conveniently, it was the best version all along! Amazing!

It somehow went from being the worst to best, without any actual improvement, just because that fits your argument.
 
This is my concern as well.

It's better for Nintendo to strike the iron while it's hot. Create a console while people are still being blown away by PS4/720 now rather than wait when PS4 graphics will be considered a thing of the past.
I don't see the huge issue. If we're looking at another 7 year cycle, that would be 2020 for the "big boys". A 5 year cycle would give Nintendo a three year head start next time. With the possibility of modestly leapfrogging the twins.

...on the strength of three Espressos stapled together and overclocked to 2ghz.
 
Oh hahahahahahhah

This is not even sad, it's just amazing. To think that I would have problably said "WHATEVER!!!!1 I DON'T LIKE EA SO THIS IS NOT BAD AT ALL!!" Before.
The Wii U is seriously in trouble.
 
Why does anyone think this is because of Wii U's power? It's perfictly powerful enough to handle Frostbite, the reason EA has no games? In development for Wii U is because of Nintendo and EA's current relationship.

If Sony could turn around the PS3, and Nintendo could turn around the 3DS than it's possible to turn around the Wii U.

Current gen HD twins ports to Wii U power excuses are definitely bullshit. It comes down to ROI for the companies, same reason for Vita's lack of big 3rd party support but growing indie support.

There is a big difference between PS3 and 3DS turning around and Wii U. Much, much different challenges. PS3 had a whole generation to turn around while still being relevant, and the added benefit of STILL being the best blu ray player on the market. Wii U is perceived as current gen fidelity, premium price, small library and bad word of mouth. With Nintendo not doing much of anything to try and combat it. Oh, and two next gen consoles about to onslaught the market with hype and marketing. It's a very poor position to be in that requires a hell of a lot more effort. It's almost like Vita and Wii U share the same marketing teams, a couple drunk/high guys in a van.
 
When COD was released every Wii U basher said it was the worst version - a screenshot of a Wii U video with a jaggy shadow in it, the same guy spamming 50 posts about how the frame rate was terrible, etc.

But now, conveniently, it was the best version all along! Amazing!

It somehow went from being the worst to best, without any actual improvement, just because that fits your argument.

I didnt buy it. I'm going by Wii U owners who did and some reviews. Your accusation aimed at me can also fit those folks who have blamed Activision for the poor sales.
 
well that's part of the risk of being an early adopter. Products fail all the time, you think the 660,000 that bought the 32x when it was discontinued got anything for it?? how about the 770,000 that bought the virtual boy? How about the 250,000 that bought the Atari Jaguar??

I personally don't think Nintendo will discontinue the Wii U (i think they are going to ride it out and see if their 1st party software will jumpstart sales), but to answer your question, no I don't think you guys deserve anything. Now will Nintendo give you guys something to help keep you around as customers?? I'm sure they would, maybe some free games, maybe a discount on the new console if you trade in your wii u, i'm sure they'd think of some olive branch for you guys.
To be honest, I've spent $600 on my system and games so far, and played for almost 300 hours. Even if it exploded right now, I've seen much worse bang for buck than that.

Nintendo will ride it out. 2016 or so we should have a good idea where they're headed next.
 
Unprecedented partnership = no games in development?

Liars. Somebody should sue them or something.

In the meantime we should go used games only for EA games. Unprecedented customer support. :P
 
This is my concern as well.

It's better for Nintendo to strike the iron while it's hot. Create a console while people are still being blown away by PS4/720 now rather than wait when PS4 graphics will be considered a thing of the past.
With new tech like HMC around the corner, Nintendo could wait until 2015 and pull a true Dreamcast by leapfrogging. Then release their next console same time or year after the Durango/PS4 successors. We will see how many gens until cloud completely makes consoles processing unnecessary.
 
I don't see the huge issue. If we're looking at another 7 year cycle, that would be 2020 for the "big boys". A 5 year cycle would give Nintendo a three year head start next time. With the possibility of modestly leapfrogging the twins.

...on the strength of three Espressos stapled together and overclocked to 2ghz.

Why should Nintendo do that when according to many folks who defend the Wii U's tech that more powerful graphics arent needed? That Nintendo makes games that are all art style not graphically powerful. Also, the Wii U having a full year to itself from the PS4/Nextbox was suppose to be a big deal. Instead it will be a year of wasted opportunity.
 
Why should Nintendo do that when according to many folks who defend the Wii U's tech that more powerful graphics arent needed? That Nintendo makes games that are all art style not graphically powerful. Also, the Wii U having a full year to itself from the PS4/Nextbox was suppose to be a big deal. Instead it will be a year of wasted opportunity.
You're trying too hard at this point.
 
My thinking as well. Just start over, get a system with the basics included (which the Wii U does not) and work from there.

Why would anyone buy that when they could buy a PS4/720?

I don't think there's anything that can save Nintendo home consoles. They'll always be behind in online and 3rd party support.
 
With new tech like HMC around the corner, Nintendo could wait until 2015 and pull a true Dreamcast by leapfrogging. Then release their next console same time or year after the Durango/PS4 successors. We will see how many gens until cloud completely makes consoles processing unnecessary.
Would Iwata do this though?

The guy just made a console that struggles against 6 year old consoles. I have little belief Iwata can even create a console 2x better than PS4 in 2015 and even then, we're probably looking at huge sacrifices on the CPU.
 
Guys, guys... get your Nintendo bashing back on the same page. this circle jerk is starting to get out of sync. Can't have that.



5 days late (much more in the EU), no preorder bonuses, no DLC, delayed/missing patches, no double XP weekends the first couple times, the list goes on.

Plus Wii remote aiming was broken for weeks after launch.

2nd class citizens. It's a vicious cycle I guess. Only Ubi seems to have any serious interest in breaking the cycle. EA takes their ball and goes home. Blame belongs with various parties including Nintendo, but not just Nintendo.

Nintendo themselves made their system the "2nd class citizen" by delivering a greatly inferior product to existing machines with the Wii U: The reason Black Ops 2 for Wii U lacked the Nuketown map was due to the fact that Nintendo didn't support DLC at launch - that was patched in later (December).
 
I really wish there was a gaming journalist who could ask some serious questions about this relationship right now.

In the mean time we're stuck with stupidity. :(
 
You're trying too hard at this point.

Its a fair response. The Wii was all about the Wiimote and casual crowd. Graphics werent an issue. The assumption was that the Wii U was good enough power wise and the gamepad would be a repeat successful gimmick. You're arguing that Nintendo will leapfrog the PS4/Nextbox in 4-5 years and that will help the system be a success?
 
Would Iwata do this though?

The guy just made a console that struggles against 6 year old consoles. I have little belief Iwata can even create a console 2x better than PS4 in 2015 and even then, we're probably looking at huge sacrifices on the CPU.
He likely would not, but he may not be around to make that decision.
 
I really wish there was a gaming journalist who could ask some serious questions about this relationship right now.

In the mean time we're stuck with stupidity. :(

Ha, yea right. We had a "journalist" comment not long ago about not delving into the Amazon/Nintendo thing afraid of burning bridges. Yea, some real hardcore, investigative gaming journalists out there. If it doesn't drop in their lap or posted to GAF its too much work.
 
I really wish there was a gaming journalist who could ask some serious questions about this relationship right now.

In the mean time we're stuck with stupidity. :(

I really don't understand what kind of insights you hope to glean from any journalistic interview: The numbers we have speak for themselves, EA is in this for the money. They obviously don't see any future sales potential in the platform for their games, there's no need for pointless interviews that won't give us any more hard facts than we already have.
 
The hope was that FIFA 14 was not announced because they were waiting for next gen consoles (Xbox) to be unveiled, and there you would hear about next gen FIFA, which would in theory include the Wii U

The problem that some were ignoring is that EA does not refer to the Wii U as next gen, this is back when "Gen 4" was referring to 720/PS4, if there was a FIFA for Wii U it would have been announced when the PS3 and 360 versions were announced.

Big question now is, who else other than EA is going to be doing this
 
Why does anyone think this is because of Wii U's power? It's perfictly powerful enough to handle Frostbite, the reason EA has no games? In development for Wii U is because of Nintendo and EA's current relationship.

If Sony could turn around the PS3, and Nintendo could turn around the 3DS than it's possible to turn around the Wii U.

Honestly, I don't think it is possible. Those were all entirely different circumstances. The PS3 wasn't severely gimped compared to its competition, and the 3DS had no competition. The Wii U has the PS4 and the 720 breathing down its neck.
 
The hope was that FIFA 14 was not announced because they were waiting for next gen consoles (Xbox) to be unveiled, and there you would hear about next gen FIFA, which would in theory include the Wii U

The problem that some were ignoring is that EA does not refer to the Wii U as next gen, this is back when "Gen 4" was referring to 720/PS4, if there was a FIFA for Wii U it would have been announced when the PS3 and 360 versions were announced.

Big question now is, who else other than EA is going to be doing this

Seriously, how can it get any worse.
 
I really don't understand what kind of insights you hope to glean from any journalistic interview: The numbers we have speak for themselves, EA is in this for the money. They obviously don't see any future sales potential in the platform for their games, there's no need for pointless interviews that won't give us any more hard facts than we already have.

Seriously, it's pretty fucking obvious. EA made an effort to put shit out on the Wii because there were obviously a ton of those out there. Where's the incentive now? When you consider it's underpowered, saddled with a gimmicky gamepad, still years behind with their online services, and not likely to ever sell as well as the Wii, it's plain to see what EA's thinking. Why make that extra effort for meager return?
 
Ubisoft doing the same? Activision doing the same after CoD Ghosts? Sales staying stagnant or going lower?

Well if you have games that are going to transition from the Xbox 360 and PS3 to at least 8gb of ram and millions of people online daily why change your vision of the game to accommodate a console like the Wii U? How well does DLC sell on the Wii U? That is one of the key areas EA is moving to, micro-transactions.
 
The reason Black Ops 2 for Wii U lacked the Nuketown map was due to the fact that Nintendo didn't support DLC at launch - that was patched in later (December).
Source? I could swear Just Dance 4 had DLC pretty close to day one.

But even so, five months later there's still no Nuketown.
 
This, in my opinion, makes me think less of EA. If Activision, and Ubisoft for god’s sake can support the Wii U, so can EA. The amount of hyperbole over the Wii U's death is staggering right now, but most of you guys know, even if it is comedic gold to lambaste Nintendo right now, they will turn the tide.

EA knows this as well. Now if this is only a temporary lapse of support, which would seem better than no support at all, is still silly. Not building an audience with the growing cliental can lead to laggard sells in the long haul.
 
The whole EA sports catalog/Sims? If your talking about stuff like Spongebob then no outside Fancy Pants Adventures/Popcap Games.

I think that might be to do with it as well tbh, Ubisoft still have Rayman type of games and they are/were making a point of getting in on the userbase early.

I think they don't see the console as really having properly launched yet, maybe down the line we'll see some newer IPs (as well as their regular sports titles etc at least). But you can't blame them for waiting till after Nintendo puts out Mario Galaxy and Kart at least.
 
Its a fair response. The Wii was all about the Wiimote and casual crowd. Graphics werent an issue. The assumption was that the Wii U was good enough power wise and the gamepad would be a repeat successful gimmick. You're arguing that Nintendo will leapfrog the PS4/Nextbox in 4-5 years and that will help the system be a success?
Nintendo fans aren't a hive mind. I never personally said graphics don't matter (along with many others). I have a gaming PC as well as a Wii U.

If Wii U struggles and Nintendo does another five year cycle, why not leapfrog PS4 in 2017...

Iwata wouldn't do it probably but as Fourth Storm said, he may not be around to have a say in the matter.
 
This, in my opinion, makes me think less of EA. If Activision, and Ubisoft for god’s sake can support the Wii U, so can EA. The amount of hyperbole over the Wii U's death is staggering right now, but most of you guys know, even if it is comedic gold to lambaste Nintendo right now, they will turn the tide.

EA knows this as well. Now if this is only a temporary lapse of support, which would seem better than no support at all, is still silly. Not building an audience with the growing cliental can lead to laggard sells in the long haul.

I realize it's probably comfortable to not live in reality, but I'm sorry to have to break this to you - Wii U is dead.
 
Nintendo themselves made their system the "2nd class citizen" by delivering a greatly inferior product to existing machines with the Wii U: The reason Black Ops 2 for Wii U lacked the Nuketown map was due to the fact that Nintendo didn't support DLC at launch - that was patched in later (December).

Doesn't that sound like the most depressing thing to hear for a console that launched last year?

It didn't launch with DLC support.
 
Source? I could swear Just Dance 4 had DLC pretty close to day one.

But even so, five months later there's still no Nuketown.

Nintendo had a press release about the fact that they were adding in proper DLC support to the eShop at a later date: Considering you've been a staunch Wii U aficionado this whole time, I'm a bit surprised you don't know about this. Just Dance 4 had its additional song downloads added in January (the DLC page itself appeared in late December).
 
Not easy to develop for, not cheap to develop for, not widespread enough to develop for, not smart to invest it, not smart to acknowledge relationship.
Well, it seems like devs certainly want to end the 6 month (year)-old console's life cycle, and push for a true next-gen successor.

Consumers certainly don't want a piece of its expensive booty.

You don't come to a race with a steamboat.

Hardy-har-har!
 
Ubisoft doing the same? Activision doing the same after CoD Ghosts? Sales staying stagnant or going lower?

EA leaving is already as bad as that. I can't see sales plummeting any more than they already have regardless of more third parties leaving. It will have plateaued so to speak until the next big 1st party release.

Basically, there's little Nintendo can do other than treating this as the Mario/Zelda machine. Pump out some quality handful of first party titles for the next four years and launch a new console after that.
 
Any chance we can get the monthly sales rate of the Virtual Boy added to the charts? That way at least it looks like the Wii U isn't their worst selling device ever.
 
Nintendo fans aren't a hive mind. I never personally said graphics don't matter (along with many others). I have a gaming PC as well as a Wii U.

If Wii U struggles and Nintendo does another five year cycle, why not leapfrog PS4 in 2017...

Iwata wouldn't do it probably but as Fourth Storm said, he may not be around to have a say in the matter.

I never said Nintendo fans are a hivemind. I'm a Nintendo fan too for crying out loud. Also Wii to Wii U was 6 years FYI. You're assuming PS4/NextBox will be 7+ years.
 
Top Bottom