The only correct score for this game.itsinmyveins said:Heavy Rain got a 7.
The only correct score for this game.itsinmyveins said:Heavy Rain got a 7.
itsinmyveins said:No, it's meant to bait the shit out of whiny people :lol
I'm not seeing anything surprising there. Those scores echo my feelings, except for GoW3 which I haven't played yet and maybe Heavy Rain scoring too high.itsinmyveins said:So.
Killzone 2 got a 7.
Heavy Rain got a 7.
God of War 3 got an 8.
Mass Effect 2 got a 9 and Halo 3 got a 10.
I just wanted to remind you guys.
lorddarkflare said:I suppose the intent is to illustrate that these mean nothing since they are just numbers and we do not know the content of the reviews.
If so, I agree.
ME got an 7 if i remember correctly, and it is a better game than the second i'd say, which is only better on the technical side and probably, budgetitsinmyveins said:So.
Killzone 2 got a 7.
Heavy Rain got a 7.
God of War 3 got an 8.
Mass Effect 2 got a 9 and Halo 3 got a 10.
I just wanted to remind you guys.
number1jagsfan said:Ugh, your attitude is just all wrong. Big budget games automatically deserve better scores, I don't even know how to respond to that.
itsinmyveins said:No, it's meant to bait the shit out of whiny people :lol
tzare said:ME got an 7 if i remember correctly, and it is a better game than the second i'd say, which is only better on the technical side and probably, budget
itsinmyveins said:Then you'll be happy to know that the scores only take up 10-20 characters in total in a magazine of over 100 pages.
I don't think Edge is biased at all. They just don't even try to pretend to create "objective" reviews, like many publications do. As such, it's not surprising that their scores can be completely different from someone else's personal evaluation of the game -- they are also just the expression of a single opinion.fortified_concept said:Fair and balanced.
Durante said:I don't think Edge is biased at all. They just don't even try to pretend to create "objective" reviews, like many publications do. As such, it's not surprising that their scores can be completely different from someone else's personal evaluation of the game -- they are also just the expression of a single opinion.
itsinmyveins said:So.
Killzone 2 got a 7.
Heavy Rain got a 7.
God of War 3 got an 8.
Mass Effect 2 got a 9 and Halo 3 got a 10.
I just wanted to remind you guys.
nib95 said:Eh, you misread my point. It's not just that they are big budget titles (I didn't even know Bioshock was a big budget title? Didn't it cost less to make than Prototype?) it's just they are generally better games with far more polish and sophistication in design, delivery, tech, visuals, art direction, sound, polish, narrative, level design etc etc. And the general consensus would tend to agree. It's not some sort of conspiracy that these bigger budget big titles tend to do better review wise, it's usually because of the time and money invested that developers CAN make these particular titles better (not always mind).
WrikaWrek said:I would say Mass Effect 2 is better than Mass Effect in every single way, by a margin it ain't even funny.
I would give ME1 a 7 and ME2 a 9.
schennmu said:GAF > Any pretentious magazine.
Also, it's free!
itsinmyveins said:So.
Killzone 2 got a 7.
Heavy Rain got a 7.
God of War 3 got an 8.
Mass Effect 2 got a 9 and Halo 3 got a 10.
I just wanted to remind you guys.
tzare said:i'd give them both a 8.
Durante said:I don't think Edge is biased at all. They just don't even try to pretend to create "objective" reviews, like many publications do. As such, it's not surprising that their scores can be completely different from someone else's personal evaluation of the game -- they are also just the expression of a single opinion.
WrikaWrek said:I would say Mass Effect 2 is better than Mass Effect in every single way, by a margin it ain't even funny.
I would give ME1 a 7 and ME2 a 9.
Gravijah said:What is the person in your avatar from?
Gomu Gomu said:The only correct score for this game.
Ainigma said:At the end of the day it's just their opinion, but, what some might find interesting, is that the review scores for Mass Effect 2 and Halo 3 are consistent with what the rest of the gaming world thought, but the killzone 2, Heavy Rain and God of War 3 scores, are currently sitting in the lowest 3 or 4 scores each game has received (using Meta Critic)
WrikaWrek said:One thing you won't get from EDGE is, you read the text and think "Man, game is taking a beating" and then look at the score "Wow a 9, i must buy this game"
...and just like Fox News inconsistency in the way they approach certain subjects doesn't matter amongst people who hear what they want to hear.
I agree with the second guy. ME2 crapped all over the the first one and it will be a shame if it doesnt pick up plenty of awards at the end of the year. 10/10EDarkness said:I agree with the first guy. ME2 wasn't anywhere near the first game. Maybe better technically, but the game wasn't as good in my opinion.
Capt'n Farrell said:I'm pretty sure someone already said this but I'll just say it again:
EDGE SCORE THREADS ARE POINTLESS AND STUPID!
Who cares about that number they just slap at the end of each review?
EagleEyes said:I agree with the second guy. ME2 crapped all over the the first one and it will be a shame if it doesnt pick up plenty of awards at the end of the year. 10/10![]()
If we're using the entire scale...Dirtyshubb said:A 5 for AVP?!?
I know it may not have all the fancy bells and whistles that modern games have but its still a damn fun game and definitly deserves more than that.
Shurs said:The ten point scale is worthless.
Danielsan said:Surprised God of War 3 didn't get a 7 as per Edge tradition.
eggandI said:GoW3 is ridiculously more interesting than Bayonetta. GoW3 is the second game (first being Demon's Souls) this gen where I can say the word Epic truly fits. Bayonetta may have more gameplay fluff, but that is just means to an end. Not like either game is terribly challenging. In bayonetta you can do more combos while enemies float in the air like they are in zero g. In GoW you can just rip their throats out or break their backs. Just means to an end, is all.
Cerebral Assassin said:So why do you care so much?
KingGondo said:For anyone who didn't bother to actually read the FFXIII review, they simply say that while the game does have redeeming qualities, it's questionable whether all the bullshit you have to plow through to get to the good stuff is worth the investment.
Sounds like a mediocre game to me. Think of it as a "two star" movie review. Makes much more sense in that context.
And GoW3 getting an 8 is probably about what I expected. Fantastically executed over-the-top action, but nothing revolutionary. Still can't wait.![]()
evalue said:is this allowed on gaf
jhenedo said:So nowadays only revolutionary games get full points? Now this is the biggest difference between movie reviewers and game reviewers. EXECUTION of an idea is should be regarded just as highly as a NEW idea!!! But a new idea with poor execution is TERRIBLE no matter how well you spin it. C'mon people!
PepsimanVsJoe said:Gameplay fluff?
What the fuckkkkkkkkk?
I'm really sorry I read this post.
lorddarkflare said:Strawman alert.
Also, you make the assumption that not being 'revolutionary' is the only flaw.
I actually don't think Edge cares much about gameplay innovation. Just look at their Valkyria Chronicles score.jhenedo said:Isn't it always? Especially for publications like edge and gamestrailers? And again in the case i was replying to that is what HE implied.
jhenedo said:So nowadays only revolutionary games get full points? Now this is the biggest difference between movie reviewers and game reviewers. EXECUTION of an idea is should be regarded just as highly as a NEW idea!!! But a new idea with poor execution is TERRIBLE no matter how well you spin it. C'mon people!