Halo 3 and Halo: Reach both looked better than Halo 4.
343 prioritized the wrong things.
I actually recently played halo 3 and the only good thing about 3 is the hdr lightning in some of the levels. Reach and 4 look better than halo 3 overall.
Halo 3 and Halo: Reach both looked better than Halo 4.
343 prioritized the wrong things.
Dennis, you crazy. The resolution bump alone makes Halo 3 laughable compared to Halo 4.Halo 3 and Halo: Reach both looked better than Halo 4.
343 prioritized the wrong things.
I never thought Kameo would be the only game like Kameo on the Xbox 360.
I actually recently played halo 3 and the only good thing about 3 is the hdr lightning in some of the levels. Reach and 4 look better than halo 3 overall.
Could someone please elaborate on why they think Halo 4 looks so amazing? Most of the "vistas" were jpegs in the skybox.
Background looks straight up N64 like. 2D Trees and flat shaded grass.
Apart from the rim lighting, I don't know why Galaxy games are looked up to so much. I always thought it was Gamecube plus and it shows.
Halo 4 had terrible art direction and the sacrifices they made to up the resolution were not worth it.Dennis, you crazy. The resolution bump alone makes Halo 3 laughable compared to Halo 4.
I think the new Mario game looks the best for the general achievement award.
Every time someone posts a screen I'm amazed both because of how good it looks and that it's on Wii U.
Clearly you never heard of kirby's epic yarnno contest for me
In no way does 3 look better than 4, if you want to argue Reach I could sorta understand that, but still I think 4 clearly outclasses both graphically. Now there are other factors to talk that 4 doesn't do as well, level not being nearly as open or sandbox-y.
Red Dead Redemption
God Of War Ascencion. That final battle could have passed as next gen.
why did you do this
( 0% chance but it would be the best thing of 2015 for sure if it was there )