phosphor112
Banned
Counter knifing shouldn't exist. It should only block/parry at best. Knifing means you had the upper hand. It shouldn't mean that the other guy gets a chance to kill you.
Currently it's using FXAA, but it's said to use TMAA(Temporal Multisampling Anti-Aliasing ) in the final build.Yea it could be that. what kind of AA,etc is killzone using. It could be they both prefer to use some other aspects.
Yea im not fuckin with it then.. Im a cod guy but wanted to really try BF again but yhese impressions sound wack.
Maybe but I love the gameplay much more than BFTo be fair cod for next gen is not really "next gen". I would say in about two years it will be truly next gen.
Counter knifing shouldn't exist. It should only block/parry at best. Knifing means you had the upper hand. It shouldn't mean that the other guy gets a chance to kill you.
Beat me! All the impression sounded like PC is better but X1 is good. What did people expect X1 to be better?"it looks ok"
"not that bad"
"it was decent"
Doesn't sound good to me.
Was this definitely running on Xbone hardware or devkit or what?
baka?
Fuuuuuuu
I really don't want to play this on PC (mostly because I prefer using the 360 pad for all of my PC games), but I might have no choice.
Where's that Spookie comment?
Might hold off getting this for consoles. Stick with Watch_Dogs and AC4
Wonder why they are not allowing recording.
What did people expect X1 to be better?
"it looks ok"
"not that bad"
"it was decent"
Doesn't sound good to me.
what did you expect?
because they are going to tell us close to launch that after testing It on consoles, they felt 32 players was the best battlefield console experience. *read in Patrick Bach voice* lol.Why do they keep showing 16 vs 16 on consoles and not 64 players?
ThisWhy do they keep showing 16 vs 16 on consoles and not 64 players? Worried there may be a drop of for 64 players on next gen.
Why do they keep showing 16 vs 16 on consoles and not 64 players? Worried there may be a drop of for 64 players on next gen.
So are the developers not familiar enough with the tech to make it 1080P? Should we be expecting it for BF5?
"looks pretty good""it looks ok"
"not that bad"
"it was decent"
Doesn't sound good to me.
Maybe it's not that there's too little ram, rather, it takes too long to fill that memory?It's really weird that texture quality is such a problem on both consoles apparently with the amount of RAM both have inside them. :-/
So is he saying it looks and plays like BF3 on PC? Cause that is what I am getting from the Tweets.
I am more worried about how it plays on a controller with so many people and large environments. I all ways had issues with sniping in BFBC2.
May or may not have something to do with the console in the thread title."looks pretty good"
"looks very good"
"looks swish"
And multiple comments about solid framerate.
Why ignore the people saying good things?
"looks pretty good"
"looks very good"
"looks swish"
And multiple comments about solid framerate.
Why ignore the people saying good things?
So are the developers not familiar enough with the tech to make it 1080P? Should we be expecting it for BF5?
May or may not have something to do with the console in the thread title.
Gemüsepizza;83789717 said:I guess it's simply because 32 demo stations don't need as much space as 64 demo stations.
Nah it is gaf. If a game has 100 positive reviews and one negative you always have people that go "Preorder cancelled!".
Alright I don't get it.Have to say I have not seen any impressive footage of BF4 yet. PC or consoles. BF3 looked bad too so nothing new really.
Cross-gen porting and not optimized for PS4 or Xbone, I'm thinking. The next games can cross off PS3/XB360 support and there will be more experience with the 2 consoles. PC versions can brute force because of better hardware.I can tell you from the Gamescom PS4 build that it ran well, but the texture quality of the environment was kinda poor. I expected more, but then I thought they might still be working on it. On the other hand who knows how much time they had to port this. That these consoles are clearly capable of more has already been shown of by other games.
It will be interesting to see the difference between the PS3/360 versions compared to the One & PS4 versions.
That will get to show us how much has actually been done for the new consoles.
Wasn't expecting it to be better than PC, that would just be stupid.
Have to say I have not seen any impressive footage of BF4 yet. PC or consoles. BF3 looked bad too so nothing new really.
"looks pretty good"
"looks very good"
"looks swish"
And multiple comments about solid framerate.
Why ignore the people saying good things?
"looks pretty good"
"looks very good"
"looks swish"
And multiple comments about solid framerate.
Why ignore the people saying good things?
I am so far really disappointed with all the maps shown. Very bland to be honest. If it wasn't for the fact I ordered a bundle I probably would have cancelled the purchase of it.