Caayn
Member
Sorry I lack proper knowledge of AA techniques but do these two screenshots help?
1920x1080 + SMAA 1tx
1920x1080 + no AA
-
Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!
Evolve PC performance thread
- Thread starter JaseC
- Start date
1920x1080 + SMAA 1tx
1920x1080 + no AA
icecold1983
Member
the temporal aspect only kicks in when you are moving. when standing still its just regular smaa 1x. the quality of this version is very similar to watch dogs temporal smaa.
Caayn
Member
Sure, same position ( I tried) and same settings but this time with SMAA 1x.
The gun is a constantly moving objects.
The gun is a constantly moving objects.
icecold1983
Member
its the most common form of temporal AA tho. the only temporal AA i think ive experienced in a pc title that worked while not moving are txaa and ryse smaa 1tx(but even with these quality is further improved in motion, most noticeably on vegetation.) all of the temporal aa in ubi games for example require movement. i need to go back and check if advanced warfare requires movement.
radioactivez0r
Member
I'm in the same boat, though I think I am running a 4570 or something like that. Since the 560 was the "minimum" I am concerned that I'd have to knock a lot of setting down to High/Medium to get a good FR.
Train of Midnight
Banned
1080p you'll get a fine framerate with meduim settings. 1440p is a no-go from my experience.
Cheers, updated OP. As an aside, and I already know the answer, but can you say whether or not AssCreed Unity's tessellation patch is still happening? As per SteamDB, v1.05 has been in development for over a month now, which is the longest incubation period yet, so I can only assume this is the "now or never" moment.
Chilled_Eskim01
Member
Someone with a GTX670 + I52500k & 8go of Ram tried the beta ? How was it?
GTX 780, i5 2500K @ 3.4GHz, 16 Gigs RAM
Played the Big Alpha, and the game ran smooth for the most part, but there were hitches every once in a while. Played it at max settings and got 60 FPS for roughly 95% of the time, with the other 5% varying between 45 and 30.
Peterthumpa
Member
Is it just me or enabling motion blur via the .cgf file messes up the introdution part when we're still inside the plane? Is that the only place where something similar happens?
Anyone having any issues with hitching or stuttering?
It doesn't matter if my settings are on low or very high, I have the exact same framerate of ~44fps. This is really odd because the beta was an extremely smooth 60fps at very high. I'm using SLI 970s with the latest driver. Rolling back on drivers made no difference. Capping or unlocking the framerate made no difference. Even when the game hits 100+ fps it hitches constantly.
It doesn't matter if my settings are on low or very high, I have the exact same framerate of ~44fps. This is really odd because the beta was an extremely smooth 60fps at very high. I'm using SLI 970s with the latest driver. Rolling back on drivers made no difference. Capping or unlocking the framerate made no difference. Even when the game hits 100+ fps it hitches constantly.
It could be SLI or lack of video memory.
I tried that, switching from 1440p (my standard res) to 1080p, and lower, made no difference. The beta was perfect using the same graphics cards.
Crimsonclaw111
Member
Having a controller in apparently fucks up keyboard prompts in menus. Also, anyone found out how to skip the intro videos?
icecold1983
Member
picked this up, motion blur is bugged. the 3 teammates on the intro ship are all permanently blurred and glitchy, so is your first person gun/gadget
after more playing its just really buggy in general in various ways. worked much better in the beta oddly enough
after more playing its just really buggy in general in various ways. worked much better in the beta oddly enough
Dictator93
Member
This 1tx doesnt look like Ryse's implementation. Hrmm
icecold1983
Member
Txaa in this game is free perf wise snd the quality of it is pretty similar to ryse when in motion. Completely deactivates when standing still tho
I looked into the pbr, and found a reddit q/a with one of the employees stating they did switch over to it as you posted. But man, it sure as hell doesnt look like it. Its a nice looking title with the clean iq txaa provides, but all the materials have that typical pre-pbr direct lighting+diffuse gamey look
Objectively Bad Opinion
Member
http://www.computerbase.de/2015-02/evolve-benchmarks-14-grafikkarten-im-vergleich/
http://www.sweclockers.com/artikel/20031-snabbtest-grafikprestanda-i-evolve/3#pagehead
benchmarks
GCN seems to do well in this game even though no drivers. Kepler is kill even with drivers...
http://www.sweclockers.com/artikel/20031-snabbtest-grafikprestanda-i-evolve/3#pagehead
benchmarks
GCN seems to do well in this game even though no drivers. Kepler is kill even with drivers...
icecold1983
Member
kepler is really faring poorly in recent games. both consoles using GCN seems to be having serious effects. even the 980 gets beat by the 290x in this title.
RenegadeXV8
Banned
I don't think it's a coincidence that both Evolve and Ryse perform far better on AMD hardware.
I'm guessing the latest iteration of CryEngine simply favors GCN.
edit: That said, Evolve's GameWorks features aren't in yet, so that could make a difference.
I'm guessing the latest iteration of CryEngine simply favors GCN.
edit: That said, Evolve's GameWorks features aren't in yet, so that could make a difference.
The 980 is ahead of the 290X at 1080p.
The relatively poor performance of Kepler could simply be attributed to weaker GPU compute performance. It's known for a long time that this is one of the GCN's strongsuit.
The 7970 will have insane legs.
Sevenfold
Member
Click skip?
Don't know if there's a command line switch for it.
My framerate really takes a dive when playing with just bots. Runs great otherwise and looks incredible. Shame about the FOV lock.
I7 2600k/780ticlassy/16GB.
Nice AMD optimisation at play there.
Can someone explain the 80ms spike on the 290x in the frametimes graph? (NM it's as the player takes control?)
icecold1983
Member
considering all the benchmarks in both links, the 290x wins.
edit - went back and checked, and in pretty much every new title, kepler is just horrible. a 780 gets matched or beaten by a 7970 for example. games i checked include far cry 4, unity, dragon age inquisition, the crew, advanced warfare, dead rising 3, ryse, mordor, and now evolve
Ivory Samoan
Member
I was just thinking how well it's going on my 7970: I'm also on Omega... waiting for the new Beta to drop any day now (it's on Guru already).
I do get the odd frame hiccup when it all gets hectic on screen... but apart from that it's running awesome 60fps on high settings in 1080p.
That's really werid, maybe it's my CPU holding it back (2500k @ 4.3)
Train of Midnight
Banned
I wouldn't buy it if you dont have a better PC to play with :/
Ivory Samoan
Member
Don't think it would be that, my 3770k is running at stock 3.5 currently.
I'm only running 2xSMAA though, maybe it's that.
Finaika
Member
I have the same poor old graphics card and it was somewhat playable on the lowest settings (I even have to lower the resolution to 720p).
Objectively Bad Opinion
Member
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Evolve-PC-258203/Specials/Test-Benchmarks-1150387/
More benchmarks. 280X stay fly, look at it go
More benchmarks. 280X stay fly, look at it go
Am I reading the CPU chart right in that the i7 5960x demolishes the 4770K? Because of the double number of cores?
I don't know what ITu is. GHz?
Actually, what's going on... i5 4670K doesn't have that many and it's whooping i7 4770K?
wtf is going on with this chart in the middle section before amd:
Russian translation says 4 and 16 threads are okay, 6, 8 or 12 is limited.
I don't know what ITu is. GHz?
Actually, what's going on... i5 4670K doesn't have that many and it's whooping i7 4770K?
wtf is going on with this chart in the middle section before amd:
Russian translation says 4 and 16 threads are okay, 6, 8 or 12 is limited.
Objectively Bad Opinion
Member
Am I reading the CPU chart right in that the i7 5960x demolishes the 4770K? Because of the double number of cores?
I don't know what ITu is. GHz?
Actually, what's going on... i5 4670K doesn't have that many and it's whooping i7 4770K?
wtf is going on with this chart in the middle section before amd:
fun with hyperthreading bugs?
this: http://www.computerbase.de/2015-02/evolve-benchmarks-14-grafikkarten-im-vergleich/ has CPU benchmarks with i7, cores disabled, no hyperthreading etc. Seems fine (other than AMD's driver hating dual core CPUs).
icecold1983
Member
these new drivers give me very frequent crashes with "dxgi_error_device_reset".
http://www.gamersnexus.net/news/1812-evolve-gtx-980-error-crash
hopefully this gets resolved asap. unlike him im able to play for a bit before it happens
http://www.gamersnexus.net/news/1812-evolve-gtx-980-error-crash
hopefully this gets resolved asap. unlike him im able to play for a bit before it happens
I had a DXGI error device hung. The game does not run very well for now, very strange.
Hyperthreading bug?
Caayn
Member
Strange, my CPU barely goes above 30% usage on all cores, it hovers mostly in the 10~20% range. And GPU scales fines to 100% usage when needed with the 347.52 driver. What's your setup?
Ok guys I was only trying out the SP mode just to learn how to play and it runs pretty bad now. However the MP mode runs as it should (60fps locked with max settings).
So this only affects the SP.
Or could just be because the Bot AI in Single payer requires a good CPU.
My sp games run sub 30 fps..mp is fine for me though.
i7-870 and GTX 760 2GB
Dictator93
Member
Cryengine has always run better with HT on (significantly better even). So I would doubt that.
They probably wrote all the AI in lua or something (like dolts).
Well whatever they've done, poor performance in SP seems to not affect CPUs capable of handling only 4 or 16 threads. If you have poor performance with a 4 core i7, you can try to disable Hyperthreading.