Shig said:I'd argue Burnout 2 -> Burnout 3 was an even bigger jump. Especially presentation-wise.
Burnout2 was better than Burnout3. I said it.
Shig said:I'd argue Burnout 2 -> Burnout 3 was an even bigger jump. Especially presentation-wise.
Sol.. said:Red Dead had ten times the character and style Gun did.
TacticalFox88 said:The fact that Killzone 2 wasn't the first reply saddens me.
bernardobri said:Final Fight 3 > Final Fight 1 & Final Fight 2
What the fuck?Totobeni said:FEAR 2 ( FEAR 1 was a bad game and boring )
I'll back you up on that. I played TM2 first and thought BRILLIANT! Then I played TM1 and couldn't figure how it'd ever gotten a sequel...rocK` said:Going to put this on the table:
Twisted Metal 2
and slowly back away
Totobeni said:FEAR 2 ( FEAR 1 was a bad game and boring )
Saint's Row 2 ( SR1 wasn't that good )
MGS Peace Walker​ ( MGS4 was shit )
Burnout Paradise ( Burnout: Revenge = meh )
Struct09 said:Warcraft II
I could be wrong, and it may not be a bad/terrible game, but I don't remember the first Warcraft really being received that well.
Have you played that shit? It was dreadful, K2 is a great answer to the thread. First thing I thought ofrevolverjgw said:First game wasn't bad/terrible, so naturally it didn't come up
Ratsofatsorat said:Warcraft: Orcs & Humans got solid reviews, won awards and was pretty profitable. I played it a lot, anyway.
Imo, the first game is better than the second.Struct09 said:Warcraft II
I could be wrong, and it may not be a bad/terrible game, but I don't remember the first Warcraft really being received that well.
You might be right. I have enjoyed all the Burnout games quite a bit, but the feeling of 2 was... sublime. I also liked the original for the sheer challenge of avoiding any and all collisions.Tenks said:Burnout2 was better than Burnout3. I said it.
Have you played Street Fighter 1?cosmicblizzard said:Seriously, there aren't really any TERRIBLE games mentioned in this thread.
hikarutilmitt said:Rushing Beat Shura > RB Ran > crap > RB
Amazingly, the first game is TERRIBLE, boring, slow and has no redeeming features. How they made two more games that were infinitely better...
hikarutilmitt said:Rushing Beat Shura > RB Ran > crap > RB
Amazingly, the first game is TERRIBLE, boring, slow and has no redeeming features. How they made two more games that were infinitely better...
Sixfortyfive said:Have you played Street Fighter 1?
Merovin said:Legacy of Goku 2 > Legacy of Goku.
truly101 said:Which one of those was Brawl Brothers in NA? That was my favorite bmup on the SNES. Peace Keepers was okay. Both were infinitely better than Rival Turf and its RADICAL box art.
Fail. "Excellent sequels to terrible games" not "Terrible sequels to excellent games"Platy said:Double Dash >>>>> Mario kart 64
Well, I didn't find the first one terrible, a shame that some things never went to the second one.rocK` said:Going to put this on the table:
Twisted Metal 2
and slowly back away
CecilRousso said:I know that few people will agree with me, but for me it´s GTA: San Andreas. It was such a good improvement in terms of how if fixed the broken things in Vice City (AI, spawning of NPC characters in random places, etc) and at the same time replaced the flat map of VC with one the most impressive game worlds I have seen.
I know that many people are really fond of VC, but for me the music and the motor cycles just weren´t enough when everything else was so bad. I actually think that VC is not good, not mediocre, but actually terrible.
coopolon said:Yah, it's tough for people going back to it these days because it is basically unplayable by modern standards, but at the time it was pretty awesome.
Although i haven't played the second yet, i thoroughly enjoyed the first. It was a solid fps with a fun mp. It has flaws, but not so much that it even needs to be thought about being put in this groupCat in the Hat said:Have you played that shit? It was dreadful, K2 is a great answer to the thread. First thing I thought of