Gravijah said:How about digital experiences?
can't movies, music, and books be digital experiences?
Gravijah said:How about digital experiences?
NullPointer said:Well, we have to stop calling the whole genre "video games" first. The moniker fits for some, but not all titles.
I sure as hell don't know a better term, but "game" seems too small a word for the whole spectrum of my experiences.
NullPointer said:Well, we have to stop calling the whole genre "video games" first. The moniker fits for some, but not all titles.
I sure as hell don't know a better term, but "game" seems too small a word for the whole spectrum of my experiences.
ILikeFeet said:can't movies, music, and books be digital experiences?
anonymousAversa said:Came here to post this.... seriously, anyone have any other ideas?
Gravijah said:
Graphics Horse said:Digital as in using your fingers then? I guess that works...
Graphics Horse said:Digital as in using your fingers then? I guess that works...
Rorschach said:Film connoisseur
TV Buffs
Bookworms
PounchEnvy said:Video games are games. It's simple. You still play video games. I don't know, calling them "experiences" and stuff like that seems a bit pretentious.
I'm not saying the term *has* to change, and I'm not offended or anything, but the term "video game" is too minimalist a term for me. Just like how we can describe some movies as films, action flicks, and just plain old movies, there are subtle differences.ultron87 said:What titles are you referring to exactly?
And are you objecting to the video part or the game part?
The term "video game" is simple, but not all that descriptive. Not meaning to come across as pretentious, but I use the term "experience" because I don't have another word.PounchEnvy said:Video games are games. It's simple. You still play video games. I don't know, calling them "experiences" and stuff like that seems a bit pretentious.
i like itGravijah said:obviously you can't call yourself a digital experiencer, then. sorry!
You might see it like that now, I'm sure you'll revert your opinion though, given time.NullPointer said:Games like Red Dead Redemption, GTA4, MGS4, Flower, Fallout 3, Bioshock just seem to me to need a better term. The best terms we have right now, "sandbox game", "open world", and "non-game" just don't do them justice imho.
NullPointer said:I'm not saying the term *has* to change, and I'm not offended or anything, but the term "video game" is too minimalist a term for me. Just like how we can describe some movies as films, action flicks, and just plain old movies, there are subtle differences.
Games like Red Dead Redemption, GTA4, MGS4, Flower, Fallout 3, Bioshock just seem to me to need a better term. The best terms we have right now, "sandbox game", "open world", and "non-game" just don't do them justice imho.
But yeah, I don't know a good term that encompasses the entire range of gaming and still fits. I just have a hard time believing that 20 years from now we'll still call these things video games.
Good. That term pisses me off. :\Gravijah said:obviously you can't call yourself a digital experiencer, then. sorry!
Action flicks and stuff like that are genres just like sandbox games and RPGs. It's a perfectly fine label.NullPointer said:I'm not saying the term *has* to change, and I'm not offended or anything, but the term "video game" is too minimalist a term for me. Just like how we can describe some movies as films, action flicks, and just plain old movies, there are subtle differences.
Games like Red Dead Redemption, GTA4, MGS4, Flower, Fallout 3, Bioshock just seem to me to need a better term. The best terms we have right now, "sandbox game", "open world", and "non-game" just don't do them justice imho.
But yeah, I don't know a good term that encompasses the entire range of gaming and still fits. I just have a hard time believing that 20 years from now we'll still call these things video games.
PounchEnvy said:Good. That term pisses me off. :\
Yeah - thats the problem, we end up with terms like that. And yeah, I do prefer a straight up "video game" label over something like that.ultron87 said:I think the closest thing to what you're suggesting would be something like "Interactive Entertainment."
NullPointer said:Yeah - thats the problem, we end up with terms like that. And yeah, I do prefer a straight up "video game" label over something like that.
But like I said, I do expect the term to change over time as the industry matures.
I'll bet you $5. ;PGravijah said:It won't. Trust me.
You can enjoy all your fancy pants experiences while I enjoy jumping on mushrooms. >Gravijah said:SHOO, LOWLY PEON! GO BACK TO PLAYING YOUR "GAMES"!
NullPointer said:I'll bet you $5. ;P
Gully State said:gamers that are sensitive to this just want to be respected for their hobby not ridiculed for it which is stupid if you ask me.
Gravijah said:yes.
If you are playing games all day, you have bigger things to worry about than labels.BattleMonkey said:Who says people all take pride in it?
Really it's just a fancy name to cover up what is considered nerdy/geeky. "oh I'm a geek who plays games all day", no no no. "Oh I'm a gamer you know...."
ILikeFeet said:but you can use your fingers to turn pages, skip to the next song, and pause/play a movie.![]()
Unfortunately social acceptance isn't based on logic.FinFan said:Why is it that if a 40yr old man that labels himself as a "football fan" and spends every Sunday watching 12 hours of football seen as socially accepted? But, if the same man spends the same amount of time playing a video game seen as completely wasting his time?
yes.Gravijah said:
Twig said:yes.
no.Gravijah said:sigh.
Twig said: