Shes not THAT bad. She's at least a little less embarrassing than Trump.
i mean I guess you thought this was clever so I'll just give a gentlemanly chuckle and be on my way
hee hee hee
Shes not THAT bad. She's at least a little less embarrassing than Trump.
When did she own up to her multiple lies?Even if she lied about this she's at least owned up to it, unlike Trump. Has he ever admitted to making a mistake or stretching the truth? Dude literally spews shit every time he's at the mic.
Hillary and Democrats lucked out extremely that the Repubs finale imploded from their own rhetoric.
I don't think Hillary could have beaten a McCain/Romney with how wounded she is limping into election day.
More electable and trustable candidate than Hillary. How anyone can honestly support her now that the FBI just said "extremely careless" I will never be able to understand.
Didn't he work to desegregate golf courses back in the early 90's?Because the alternative is Trump. A racist egomaniac that is entirely unhinged.
So because he is the anti Christ it's ok to let a extremely careless person into office? NoBecause the alternative is Trump. A racist egomaniac that is entirely unhinged.
You've never been allowed to keep classified information (of any level) in your own private custody on purpose or accidentally. This is explicitly taught and expected of you when granted a clearance. For her to be so willfully ignorant is awfully damning of not just her intelligence but her own moral fiber not to mention the classist bias in letting her get away scott free with something that if I had done I would have been in prison almost immediately.
So because he is the anti Christ it's ok to let a extremely careless person into office? No
Both of these clowns should be replaced by better candidates.
So because he is the anti Christ it's ok to let a extremely careless person into office? No
Both of these clowns should be replaced by better candidates.
Even if she lied about this she's at least owned up to it, unlike Trump. Has he ever admitted to making a mistake or stretching the truth? Dude literally spews shit every time he's at the mic.
Lol @ people voting for Gary Johnson.No charge doesn't mean she's suddenly fit to be president. She deliberately filtered information through her private, unsecured servers and then lied about it repeatedly until the FBI came out and said she's full of shit. Then, she filtered her emails again before complying with the FOIA request. If she truly thought she wasn't doing anything wrong, why was she lying about it the whole fucking time? 68 year old grandmother bullshit aside, it's her fucking job to know these things. She's the Secretary of State. Now she's in damage control again.
I love posters in this thread saying this is a widespread problem in government that needs to be addressed. Hilary seems like a fine place to start hmm?
25 years of Republican smear my ass. She's a fucking liar just like her rapist husband.
I'll be voting Gary Johnson this election since neither the Republicans nor Democrats can field a candidate that doesn't induce nausea. What a shit show.
This whole story exposed tons of government employees using not careful means of sending important top secret emails to expedite certain things. It happens (as with the sensitive drone target emails). Hillary's case is obviously more significant because she was the Secretary of State, but again... it's not illegal and much of what she did had precedent with previous Secretary of States. In other words, they did it too. Many of the rules have changed and the State Department issued guidance on this subject that she clearly ignored. That's her failing. We can accept that while acknowledging it was a stupid mistake that wasn't illegal, and that she probably needs to not do that again.
This story does not make Hillary a crook, does not make her any of the things people love to label her with. It was just sheer negligence that she needs to correct for the future. And I'm sure she will, because someone as intelligent as Hillary is hardly going to make that mistake again. Again, this is such small potatoes compared to the actually illegal things politicians have done this year alone. Hell, it's small potatoes compared to the case against Trump right now.
So because he is the anti Christ it's ok to let a extremely careless person into office? No
Both of these clowns should be replaced by better candidates.
Can you cite a case where this happened? From my understanding, when rank and file workers have done this, the worst that has happened is a negative letter in their personnel file or termination for repeat offenders.
Without intent, jail time is highly unlikely.
So because he is the anti Christ it's ok to let a extremely careless person into office? No
Both of these clowns should be replaced by better candidates.
Lol @ people voting for Gary Johnson.
What's so funny? Has he done something more embarrassing than trump or Hillary lately? I can't believe the cool thing to do now is to diss people not under the microscope for scandals.Lol @ people voting for Gary Johnson.
When did she own up to her multiple lies?
Maybe it's just exposure to politicians, but if we go by the rules of "Careless with data security" I can guarantee you that the only politicians who meet that particular bar are those who don't use technology at all.
In an organisation of 3000 people, with about 60 politicians, half the cases our IT department investigates for data breaches are from politicians. Mostly the same sort of stuff as Hillary - inappropriate usage, but no criminal intent.
Data security and classification is very hard. Normal staff members get it wrong all the time - politicians get it wrong every single day.
It seems the Health Insurance field is a lot more strict than the Goverment when it comes to people violating security protocols then. Glad you find it funny.No you don't understand. They are ALL FIRED and immediately prosecuted.
(you can really tell when someone knows nothing about this subject, it's hilarious)
Yes, his entire economic plan is more embarassing than anything Clinton has ever done. Sure, lets vote for the moron who would wreck our economy because he is scandal free.What's so funny? Has he done something more embarrassing than trump or Hillary lately? I can't believe the cool thing to do now is to diss people not under the microscope for scandals.
If you have a pretty good set of people on a site as left as neogaf giving up on Hillary, and hoping for Biden or someone else. There's trouble. I agree. Trump is still miles worse, but that's the opinion of a liberal. Trump was already polling fairly close to Hillary in some polls. With this, she may drop quite a few points.
I don't think this isn't a big deal for her. I just hope we choose the right person to take on Trump. This type of ammo is the absolute best type of ammo for Trump, and he knows how to use it effectively. I wouldn't underestimate this situation.
BokehKing said:It seems the Health Insurance field is a lot more strict than the Goverment when it comes to people violating security protocols then. Glad you find it funny.
If you have a pretty good set of people on a site as left as neogaf giving up on Hillary, and hoping for Biden or someone else. There's trouble. I agree. Trump is still miles worse, but that's the opinion of a liberal. Trump was already polling fairly close to Hillary in some polls. With this, she may drop quite a few points.
I don't think this isn't a big deal for her. I just hope we choose the right person to take on Trump. This type of ammo is the absolute best type of ammo for Trump, and he knows how to use it effectively. I wouldn't underestimate this situation.
What's so funny? Has he done something more embarrassing than trump or Hillary lately? I can't believe the cool thing to do now is to diss people not under the microscope for scandals.
Maybe it's just exposure to politicians, but if we go by the rules of "Careless with data security" I can guarantee you that the only politicians who meet that particular bar are those who don't use technology at all.
In an organisation of 3000 people, with about 60 politicians, half the cases our IT department investigates for data breaches are from politicians. Mostly the same sort of stuff as Hillary - inappropriate usage, but no criminal intent.
Data security and classification is very hard. Normal staff members get it wrong all the time - politicians get it wrong every single day.
It seems the Health Insurance field is a lot more strict than the Goverment when it comes to people violating security protocols then. Glad you find it funny.
Anybody who thinks that this email "scandal" puts Hillary Clinton anywhere NEAR the same plane as Donald Fucking Trump, a man who was praising SADDAM HUSSEIN just last night (to say nothing else of this shit he's done in the last few months), needs to be fucking honest about what is obvious: you were never going to vote for her, and you just needed the tiniest crumb to latch onto to justify it. Because holy shit at the cognitive dissonance that logic requires.
They said she sent known classified emails while in countries she shouldn't have using none secure methods.
She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries.
Yeah this is a far more concerning takeaway
I knew it couldnt just be Hillary. Its a work culture and possibly training issue?
Hillary Clinton sets up private email server to conduct state business and was sending and receiving top secret information which is illegal, but she didn't intend to, according to Comey. It was all by accident.
Comey: "Hillary broke the law, but we're just gonna give her a pass. This is not to say anyone else who does this will though... because elite immunity only applies to the few, the proud, the..."
Days earlier, on a plane in Arizona:
Bill Clinton: "'Retta, I need this to go away."
Loretta Lynch: "Yes, Mr. Clinton. You can count on me!"
Clinton: "Good, and for your service, how about staying on as Attorney General in Hillary Clinton administration?"
Lynch: "Why, I'd like that very much, sir!"
To Be Continued...
She wasn't just careless with "emails." These weren't Dilbert cartoons and lunch invites to Chilis. She was careless with National Security. You know, the thing she was sworn to protect.People have a view of Clinton that they want to make real.
Her cooperating fully with a lengthy investigation in which the most damning thing you could say is that she was careless with emails is how they want to make that happen I guess.
Hillary Clinton sets up private email server to conduct state business and was sending and receiving top secret information which is illegal, but she didn't intend to, according to Comey. It was all by accident.
Comey: "Hillary broke the law, but we're just gonna give her a pass. This is not to say anyone else who does this will though... because elite immunity only applies to the few, the proud, the..."
Days earlier, on a plane in Arizona:
Bill Clinton: "'Retta, I need this to go away."
Loretta Lynch: "Yes, Mr. Clinton. You can count on me!"
Clinton: "Good, and for your service, how about staying on as Attorney General in Hillary Clinton administration?"
Lynch: "Why, I'd like that very much, sir!"
To Be Continued...
It's mostly because the policies just don't work. I have two different security systems aside from my normal work email for sending secure data, and both are an absolute ass to use. I routinely have people, including very senior police officers and politicians, use our normal, unsecured email system to send stuff because it's simple too much of a hassle to load up egress to send over a name.
Is it wrong? Absolutely.
Does it happen all the time, every day? Absolutely.
Heck, despite training every person in the organisation I guarantee 9/0 wouldn't be able to tell you the different levels of classification protection we should be using.
In my experience, the military are the only people who can handle this okay - and even then you get cases like Petraeus.
People have a view of Clinton that they want to make real.
Her cooperating fully with a lengthy investigation in which the most damning thing you could say is that she was careless with emails is how they want to make that happen I guess.
Anybody who thinks that this email "scandal" puts Hillary Clinton anywhere NEAR the same plane as Donald Fucking Trump, a man who was praising SADDAM HUSSEIN just last night (to say nothing else of this shit he's done in the last few months), needs to be fucking honest about what is obvious: you were never going to vote for her, and you just needed the tiniest crumb to latch onto to justify it. Because holy shit at the cognitive dissonance that logic requires.
welllllllllllll she did mishandle 110 classified emails over 50+ threads and blatantly lie about it
i support Hillary but I still stand by the notion shes worse than most of her supporters are willing to admit but nowhere near as bad as her opposition paints her to be.
she fucked up real bad though. lets not act like shes innocent and everyone who believes otherwise is a trump supporter
Jesus
I would say many areas of government are long overdue for overhauls. There should be yearly audits and upgrade budgets in place to keep things smooth and efficient
But since our government is constantly shuffling staff and is bureacratic by nature this probably will never be the case
She wasn't just careless with "emails." These weren't Dilbert cartoons and lunch invites to Chilis. She was careless with National Security. You know, the thing she was sworn to protect.
So as long as you're not the level of citizen that votes for you to get into power, you will never be fired. To the common person that person is now looked at as "above the law" and "rules don't apply"no its just that its normal for a white collar crime like this to come down to intent, otherwise its always slap on the wrist. carelessness is next to gross negligence but not quite the same.
"People have a view of Clinton that they want to make real."
This swings both ways.
So as long as you're not the level of citizen that votes for you to get into power, you will never be fired. To the common person that person is now looked at as "above the law" and "rules don't apply"
I'm not saying she should be arrested btw.
welllllllllllll she did mishandle 110 classified emails over 50+ threads and blatantly lie about it
i support Hillary but I still stand by the notion shes worse than most of her supporters are willing to admit but nowhere near as bad as her opposition paints her to be.
she fucked up real bad though. lets not act like shes innocent and everyone who believes otherwise is a trump supporter
Never did I say anything about Trump, or imply it.
Numerous democrats have negative views about Hillary built up over the decades. Their views are not something that I'm judging in any way right now.
As far as lying about it, Comey did not say that she lied about anything. In fact he said that she cooperated fully with the investigation.
We have like a hundred videos of her lying about it lol
You've never been allowed to keep classified information (of any level) in your own private custody on purpose or accidentally. This is explicitly taught and expected of you when granted a clearance. For her to be so willfully ignorant is awfully damning of not just her intelligence but her own moral fiber not to mention the classist bias in letting her get away scott free with something that if I had done I would have been in prison almost immediately.