• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

February 2006 EGM Scores

Beowvlf

Banned
Swiped from the 1UP boards:

360:
Perfect Dark Zero -- 6.5 / 8 / 9
Project Gotham Racing 3 -- 9 / 8.5 / 9.5 (GOTM)
Quake 4 -- 5.5 / 5.5 / 8.0

Multiplatform:
Prince Of Persia: The Two Thrones -- 9.5 / 7 / 9
MVP 06 NCAA Baseball -- 5.5 / 8 / 6.5
50 Cent: Bulletproof -- 3.5 / 3 / 3.5
Gauntlet: Seven Sorrows -- 6.5 / 6.5 / 6
Americ'as Army: Rise of a Soldier -- 6 / 6.5 / 5

PS2:
Ape Escape 3 -- 8 / 5 / 5.5
Wild Arms 4 -- 8 / 7 / 6

Xbox:
Samurai Shodown V -- 5.5 / 5.5 / 6.5
Crime Life: Gang Wars -- 2.5 / 2 / 1.5 (SOTM)

PSP:
Tokobot -- 5.5 / 6 / 6
Ape Escape Academy -- 4.5 / 5.5 / 4.5

DS:
Electroplankton -- 5 / 7 / 5

GBA:
Final Fantasy IV Advance -- 9 / 9 / 8.5
 
Perfect Dark Zero -- 6.5 / 8 / 9
Quake 4 -- 5.5 / 5.5 / 8.0
Prince Of Persia: The Two Thrones -- 9.5 / 7 / 9
MVP 06 NCAA Baseball -- 5.5 / 8 / 6.5
Ape Escape 3 -- 8 / 5 / 5.5
Wild Arms 4 -- 8 / 7 / 6
Electroplankton -- 5 / 7 / 5

*boggles*

What's with the review spread?
 
Wild Arms 4 -- 8 / 7 / 6

Aw, I had high hopes for this one. If the rest of the reviews come in around 8 I'll get it but if they hover around 6 I'll pass.

Does anyone know what EGM gave Wild Arms 3?
 
Mrbob said:
These scores are all over the place.

Yeah, it's nice to have different opinions in a review, but when they vary this much and the writers only give a short paragraph defending their score, this system is pretty much useless.

For PDZ, the 6.5 is probably Hsu and the 9 from Che.
 
Heian-kyo said:
Ape Escape 3 -- 8 / 5 / 5.5
Samurai Shodown V -- 5.5 / 5.5 / 6.5
Ape Escape Academy -- 4.5 / 5.5 / 4.5

Well, I wanted to tighten the budget after insane Xmas spending, anyway...
 
SnowWolf said:
Yeah, it's nice to have different opinions in a review, but when they vary this much and the writers only give a short paragraph defending their score, this system is pretty much useless.

For PDZ, the 6.5 is probably Hsu and the 9 from Che.

Yeah pretty much, it just makes things worse. It's like mediocre ass to KICKASS for the same game!! For the reader that's doesn't really help.
 
Rumors from cypher07 on the 1up boards:

-A LOTR based MMORPG (supposedly sub-titled The White Council) is heading to PS3 and 360 in '07

-Reservoir Dogs will finally bloody up the PS2 and Xbox in '06, but it won't feature any of the actors' voices ore likenesses...

-Ultimate Spiderman 2 will swing next-gen consoles this fall

-Several developers (Including those in the PC community)who mostly make online games want to work on Nintendo's next-gen console.

-Medal of Honor will soon fight the good gith on Sony's handheld

-A sequel to Destroy All Humans and Gun are coming.

-This spring a 360 version of True Crime: New York City is coming
 
Ninja Scooter said:
you find it strange that 3 different people can have 3 different opinions?

Nope. Just the discrepancy. Something must have irked the dude to give a game a 6.5 while another guy gives it a 9.0.
 
DaBuddaDa said:
Wild Arms 4 -- 8 / 7 / 6

Aw, I had high hopes for this one. If the rest of the reviews come in around 8 I'll get it but if they hover around 6 I'll pass.

Does anyone know what EGM gave Wild Arms 3?

I'm not a fan of the Wild Arms series myself, but don't let review scores put you off from at least trying it. At the very least, actually READ the reviews first. Don't just rely on someone's opinion boiled down into an arbitrary number, for the love of God.

-Several developers (Including those in the PC community)who mostly make online games want to work on Nintendo's next-gen console.

Ooh, that sounds neat.
 
ForzaItalia said:
Nope. Just the discrepancy. Something must have irked the dude to give a game a 6.5 while another guy gives it a 9.0.

thats why you're supposed to read the reviews instead of just the scores.
 
Zilch said:
I'm not a fan of the Wild Arms series myself, but don't let review scores put you off from at least trying it. At the very least, actually READ the reviews first. Don't just rely on someone's opinion boiled down into an arbitrary number, for the love of God.

True, maybe your opinion will be more inline with the 8 than 6, you don't know unless you try.
 
Haha. Shoe dropped his "bomba" on PDZ...except he did it like two months late and nobody seems to care much anymore.

And I bet the Wild Arms review that has the game pegged as a six is like 40 words.
 
-Reservoir Dogs will finally bloody up the PS2 and Xbox in '06, but it won't feature any of the actors' voices ore likenesses...

WHAT'S THE POINT THEN?!?!

-Medal of Honor will soon fight the good gith on Sony's handheld

Poor PSP. :(

-A sequel to Destroy All Humans and Gun are coming.

Good! Both good games with a lot of room for improvement.

-This spring a 360 version of True Crime: New York City is coming

This could be great IF they fix the numerous glitches in the current gen version. There's a good game there trapped underneath a mess of problems.
 
Wild Arms 4 doesn't suprise me, I'm actually suprised it scored that good.

I'm also curious as to EGM's Top 200 game list, anybody got that yet?
 
"MVP 06 NCAA Baseball -- 5.5 / 8 / 6.5"

WTF :(
 
I'm not surprised by the Electroplankton scores. It's fun to play around with, but there really isn't enough to do to justify the cost.

Definitly worth getting for $10, maybe $15. I payed something like 3800 yen for my copy and wouldn't recommend it for that price (even if it came in a shiny box with spiffy headphones).
 
Matrix said:
"MVP 06 NCAA Baseball -- 5.5 / 8 / 6.5"

WTF :(


One man impersonated three names and reviewed the game:

photo_derek_jeter.jpg
 
Mrbob said:
One man impersonated three names and reviewed the game:

photo_derek_jeter.jpg

:lol
 
The wild arms series have always been crap. Though the art, production values and music are great the gameplay sucks ass.
 
Project Gotham Racing 3 -- 9 / 8.5 / 9.5 (GOTM)

Normally i would be all "woot" but considering the lack of decent titles it had to go against ....
 
I always love how people get confused or upset at review disparities. WTF is the point of having multiple reviewers if they all give the same scores? It's probably pretty accurate that at least 1/3rd of people think PDZ is a piece of shit, so I don't see the problem.
 
Dave Long said:
Actually, he's striking for the first time. This is the review they've been talking about on the 1UP show.

It's not the first time he disliked a game that most people liked.
 
WTF at the MVP scores? I wonder what the reasons are, if it's just the lack of MLB license, I won't care, but I wonder if there are other problems....
 
VALIS said:
-This spring a 360 version of True Crime: New York City is coming
This could be great IF they fix the numerous glitches in the current gen version. There's a good game there trapped underneath a mess of problems.

Hmm. Maybe they could ditch the Ja Rule trash that bears the city's name this time around.
 
HomerSimpson-Man said:
Yeah pretty much, it just makes things worse. It's like mediocre ass to KICKASS for the same game!! For the reader that's doesn't really help.

Ive always preferred EGM's multi-review format. If anything its the most helpful to the reader since chances are one persons analysis may gloss over an aspect to a game (good or bad) you'd personally find important. Nature of the subjective beast. Granted I always wished EGM added more room to expound in (bring back those feature reviews!), but they're usually pretty concise and able to get their point across at least.
 
Ninja Scooter said:
thats why you're supposed to read the reviews instead of just the scores.

QFT.


Anihawk said:
6.5 for PDZero. Ouch. It's like the two other scores don't matter.

It's not like this is the first time reviewers have had drastically different opinions... not much merit was given to the famous C- for Ninja Gaiden either.
 
Top Bottom