• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Final Fantasy XIII Information Thread | March 9, 2010 NA/EU

Status
Not open for further replies.
PSGames said:
Many people don't give two shits that it's on multiple discs. How does that change the game experience in any significant way? And the 360 version will have HD video and surround sound which is more than enough for the majority of people. Plus from my experience Multiplatform games tend to run better on 360. We'll see if that's the case this time.

Of course 360 games run better because they tend to be the lead platform. But in this case for FFXIII the lead platform is the PS3.
 
Kagari said:
It's Dra-Q. He's been trolling hardcore in that FF14 thread with claims of 'Final Fantasy should belong to the 360' and crap like that.

I thought he was kidding like those "nintendo is going 3rd party" posts that pop up now and then.

Still enough with the console wars just get it for whatever system you want and appreciate that SE put enough effort in both of the damn things to not end up with some of the lousy ports we seen all throughout this gen.

Gameplay choices aside(I am still bitter about the linearity and no towns aspect of the game) I for one is hyped that the thing is finally being released because other than an mmo and verses it looks like it will be awhile until SE decide to release another FF for consoles.
 
PSGames said:
Many people don't give two shits that it's on multiple discs. How does that change the game experience in any significant way? And the 360 version will have HD video and surround sound which is more than enough for the majority of people. Plus from my experience Multiplatform games tend to run better on 360. We'll see if that's the case this time.

Okay, I'm officially baffled here. I think I'll just leave this topic be since it seems more about system preference than any conveniences or enhancements the game may provide based on platform.

Also, for my part, I am done discussing this.

Putting it back on track by saying: I cannot bloody wait for this and regardless of platform, the game will be magical. Moving on...
 
Green Mamba said:
I don't see why there's such a big hubbub about all this. People will get the version they decide to get. It has zero effect on anyone but the person purchasing it. I mean, seriously, I...

w9a5v5.jpg

zjyywl.jpg


...oh.

:lol :lol

excellent setup
 
Can someone explain the difference lossless audio makes versus compressed?

Cause I only have a 360 and a Blu Ray player, and I just got a 5.1 system that sounds insanely good with every game and movie I play.
 
Wow. These 360 vs PS3 "imaginings" is ridiculous. Do you honestly give a cat's ass if the audio is a little better on one system or one has more discs than the other? There wont be a significant enough difference to make the case for either system so why can't we just talk about the actual game.....
 
Arpharmd B said:
Can someone explain the difference lossless audio makes versus compressed?

Cause I only have a 360 and a Blu Ray player, and I just got a 5.1 system that sounds insanely good with every game and movie I play.

Obviously even more "insanely good" sound quality. :P
 
The PS3 version is definitely superior. Why? Because it's been out for almost 2 months, and the 360 version isn't. Also, no Maaya Sakamoto on the 360. Suck it! I win! :D
 
gamergirly said:
Wow. These 360 vs PS3 "imaginings" is ridiculous. Do you honestly give a cat's ass if the audio is a little better on one system or one has more discs than the other? There wont be a significant enough difference to make the case for either system so why can't we just talk about the actual game.....

They're still hurt from the Betraylton of E3 2008. Both versions will be identical, no matter what some fanboys say.
 
Dra-Q said:
They're still hurt from the Betraylton of E3 2008. Both versions will be identical, no matter what some fanboys say.
Didn't a recent article say they were using different engines? Surely there would be some differences then. I'm sure they will be incredibly minor so that no sane person would care, but still differences....
 
jett said:
Obviously even more "insanely good" sound quality. :P

I get ya but I'm asking for a serious answer. Like, ok, with graphics I have something quantifiable to go by. I can see the difference in image quality, the difference in framerate, or the difference in AA. It's plain to see.

Put this into terms I can understand. Is the sound more crisp? Louder, more sounds, cleaner sound? I can't hear a bit of distortion in the music or sound effects of 360 games that's why I'd like to have someone truly explain to me the difference my ears will be hearing.

I mean for example I rent 1080p movies off the marketplace (downloads not streams) and I watch Blu Rays and for the life of me I can't tell a single difference be it in the sound department or visuals :/ And I'm not the typical retard who can't spot differences between 60 and 30 fps, I have a serious eye for visuals so someone teach me how I can have an ear for audio, and what differences I should expect to hear.
 
Synless said:
Didn't a recent article say they were using different engines? Surely there would be some differences then. I'm sure they will be incredibly minor so that no sane person would care, but still differences....

No.

duckroll said:
Why? Because it's been out for almost 2 months, and the 360 version isn't.

Totally weird I haven't seen either version at the local retailers. :P
 
Jtyettis said:
No.


Totally weird I haven't seen either version at the local retailers. :P

Yes.

Q: Didn't the simultaneous development on both the PS3 and the XBOX360 cause difficulties?

KITASE: We have made it our top priority to deliver the same quality on both consoles. It was self-evident that it brought some difficulties with it. Both consoles require a different approach. Especially on the graphics section. We had to build a different engine for both versions. We needed a year of tinkering on each engine in order to get the same level of graphics.

Edit* fuck I didn't realize there were scans included. Ready for my ban :(
 
Synless said:
Q: Didn't the simultaneous development on both the PS3 and the XBOX360 cause difficulties?

KITASE: We have made it our top priority to deliver the same quality on both consoles. It was self-evident that it brought some difficulties with it. Both consoles require a different approach. Especially on the graphics section. We had to build a different engine for both versions. We needed a year of tinkering on each engine in order to get the same level of graphics.

http://finalfantasy-xiii.net/2010/0...fantasy-xiii-feature-and-interview-scans.html

Yes.

Well that is news to me as I thought they were both based off Crystal Tools.
 
Synless said:
Yes.

Q: Didn't the simultaneous development on both the PS3 and the XBOX360 cause difficulties?

KITASE: We have made it our top priority to deliver the same quality on both consoles. It was self-evident that it brought some difficulties with it. Both consoles require a different approach. Especially on the graphics section. We had to build a different engine for both versions. We needed a year of tinkering on each engine in order to get the same level of graphics.

http://finalfantasy-xiii.net/2010/0...fantasy-xiii-feature-and-interview-scans.html

I think that's a bad translation. They are built on the same multiplatform engine.
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The PS3 version is definitely superior. Why? Because it's been out for almost 2 months, and the 360 version isn't. Also, no Maaya Sakamoto on the 360. Suck it! I win!

ROFL

5 weeks.... 2 days before my B-Day and several long years since FF-XII. I can't wait either way and I'll be playing it hard,I just have to hurry up and play though WKC....
 
Arpharmd B said:
I get ya but I'm asking for a serious answer. Like, ok, with graphics I have something quantifiable to go by. I can see the difference in image quality, the difference in framerate, or the difference in AA. It's plain to see.

Put this into terms I can understand. Is the sound more crisp? Louder, more sounds, cleaner sound? I can't hear a bit of distortion in the music or sound effects of 360 games that's why I'd like to have someone truly explain to me the difference my ears will be hearing.

I mean for example I rent 1080p movies off the marketplace (downloads not streams) and I watch Blu Rays and for the life of me I can't tell a single difference be it in the sound department or visuals :/ And I'm not the typical retard who can't spot differences between 60 and 30 fps, I have a serious eye for visuals so someone teach me how I can have an ear for audio.

Well in the case of several PS3 games lossless audio means LPCM 7.1(FFXIII btw is "only" 5.1), which means two extra channels obviously. Audio is also much clearer and cleaner. You'll need a new receiver to take advantage of this, and high quality speakers will make a big difference. This is just how the audio signal is carried, seperate from this is the quality of the sound samples within the blu-ray disc itself. BD having much more storage than a DVD, developers can allocate more space to sound. Among multiplatform games I imagine the difference is minimal as the 360 version is almost always the lead one, shit devs are so fucking lazy most of the time they don't even bother to recompress their FMV for the PS3, they just use the same files the 360 version has. :P

If you can't tell the difference between an online video and blu-rays there may be no hope for you though. :P Then again it might be due to your receiver not supporting lossless audio.
 
gkrykewy said:
I think that's a bad translation. They are built on the same multiplatform engine.

As I thought. Perhaps separate builds within the engine. An engine within the engine then.

duckroll said:
Well that's too bad, I have.

Oh that's right we're in the NA/EU thread.
 
Dra-Q said:
They're still hurt from the Betraylton of E3 2008. Both versions will be identical, no matter what some fanboys say.

Prime example of Xbot, please tell us when you have come back to the same reality as we're living in.

Simply logic would tell you that 38GB of data dont fit on 3 DL DVDs...
 
Synless said:
Yes.

Q: Didn't the simultaneous development on both the PS3 and the XBOX360 cause difficulties?

KITASE: We have made it our top priority to deliver the same quality on both consoles. It was self-evident that it brought some difficulties with it. Both consoles require a different approach. Especially on the graphics section. We had to build a different engine for both versions. We needed a year of tinkering on each engine in order to get the same level of graphics.
Is linking to magazine scans OK?

Do you think the 360 version will have 1080p FMV?
There is no doubt, it won't, 3 dvds won't cut it, but who know NA/EU ps3 version will? It's S-E they can always surprise us :lol

I'm curious, is there any other game that has 1080p FMVs? Not having them is hardly an issue for 360.
 
jett said:
Well in the case of several PS3 games lossless audio means LPCM 7.1(FFXIII btw is "only" 5.1), which means two extra channels obviously. Audio is also much clearer and cleaner. You'll need a new receiver to take advantage of this, and high quality speakers will make a big difference. This is just how the audio signal is carried, seperate from this is the quality of the sound samples within the blu-ray disc itself. BD having much more storage than a DVD, developers can allocate more space to sound. Among multiplatform games I imagine the difference is minimal as the 360 version is almost always the lead one, shit devs are so fucking lazy most of the time they don't even bother to recompress their FMV for the PS3, they just use the same files the 360 version has. :P

If you can't tell the difference between an online video and blu-rays there may be no hope for you though. :P Then again it might be due to your receiver not supporting lossless audio.

My setup is a 5.1 surround, 5 speakers (subwoofer would make it 6) so I wouldn't be able to take advantage of 7.1 lossless anyway?
 
Jtyettis said:
No.



Totally weird I haven't seen either version at the local retailers. :P




Originally Posted by Synless:
Yes.

Q: Didn't the simultaneous development on both the PS3 and the XBOX360 cause difficulties?

KITASE: We have made it our top priority to deliver the same quality on both consoles. It was self-evident that it brought some difficulties with it. Both consoles require a different approach. Especially on the graphics section. We had to build a different engine for both versions. We needed a year of tinkering on each engine in order to get the same level of graphics.




= jtyettis ---> PWND :lol
 
Cornbread78 said:
= jtyettis ---> PWND :lol

Heh if it using Crystal Tools it is still the same engine, but as I said perhaps seperate builds within.

Arpharmd B said:
My setup is a 5.1 surround, 5 speakers (subwoofer would make it 6) so I wouldn't be able to take advantage of 7.1 lossless anyway?

It's 8 speakers.
 
Jtyettis said:
As I thought. Perhaps separate builds within the engine. An engine within the engine then.

I wouldn't be surprised if they had to make game-specific code changes to the 360 portion of the engine in order to get it out in time.

Arpharmd B said:
My setup is a 5.1 surround, 5 speakers (subwoofer would make it 6) so I wouldn't be able to take advantage of 7.1 lossless anyway?

Subwoofer makes it .1, not 6.
 
No, I didn't realize there were scans included when I added the link. Too late for me now though I suppose....

You were vindicated, no worries...


Heh if it using Crystal Tools it is still the same engine, but as I said perhaps seperate builds within.


Probably, but who knows. It does state in his response that they used seperate engines though, so it was pretty damning...:D
 
Zoe said:
Subwoofer makes it .1, not 6.

Gotcha. Thanks for the education.

jett said:

Ok, thanks for the heads up.

One last clarification. You said Final Fantasy XIII is only 5.1 lossless? So therefor my system would make the most out of the sound? This is the only thing I'm still confused on. What would I expect to hear? Clearer than already clear samples and sound effects?

Also again, I have Blu Rays and I rented Inglorious Basterds. The download came in at like 10 gigs, and I was hard pressed to see or hear any differences. Again, this was not a stream but a full download, 1080p film. Then again, I didn't have Blu Ray version side by side or anything like that. All I know is it looked and sounded great.
 
Arpharmd B said:
Gotcha. Thanks for the education.



Ok, thanks for the heads up.

One last clarification. You said Final Fantasy XIII is only 5.1 lossless? So therefor my system would make the most out of the sound? This is the only thing I'm still confused on. What would I expect to hear? Clearer than already clear samples and sound effects?

Your receiver would need to specifically support lossless audio. Otherwise you'll get lossy audio(i.e. compressed), like Dolby Digital.
 
Seda said:
To clarify, Dolby True HD or DTS HD (Most modern receivers support both)

That's only for blu-ray. Most PS3 games, especially Japanese ones do not support either. They output using LPCM. Although, any receiver which supports TrueHD or DTS-HDMA would most definitely also support LPCM. If your receiver supports LPCM multichannel, but not Dolby TrueHD or DTS HDMA, but you are using your PS3 as a blu-ray player, then the PS3 can decode both formats and output through LPCM anyway. So your receiver doesn't have to support those formats natively.
 
I reccommend using a direct channel with a fiber optic cord from the PS3 to your receiver, it does make a big difference in sound quality. Does the 360 us FO cord as well?
 
Cornbread78 said:
I reccommend using a direct channel with a fiber optic cord from the PS3 to your receiver, it does make a big difference in sound quality. Does the 360 us FO cord as well?

Errr what? You can't output lossless surround formats using optical cables. It's HDMI only.
 
jett said:
Your receiver would need to specifically support lossless audio. Otherwise you'll get lossy audio(i.e. compressed), like Dolby Digital.

Wow well then for me this is a niche feature that is completely irrelevant to my gaming setup. Thanks for clearing this up.

As long as the visuals are indeed on par, then it comes down to 1080p video versus 720p (I don't give two fucks about controllers or disc changing).

I'm just putting this all into perspective for myself as a single console owner. Had the differences been as vast as say, Bayonetta I'd have purchased a PS3 specifically for this game.
 
Errr what? You can't output lossless surround formats using optical cables. It's HDMI only.


I run the audio directly from the PS3 to my receiver, I bypass and turn off my TV sound since I play with headphones most of the time. The sound comes through much better that way.
 
well i'm buying the 360 version no matter what because i love earning me some achievements! there, i said it! let the truth be known
that i'll also be getting the ps3 version as well. teehee.
 
Cornbread78 said:
I run the audio directly from the PS3 to my receiver, I bypass and turn off my TV sound since I play with headphones most of the time. The sound comes through much better that way.

I don't know what you're talking about. No one with a home theatre set up uses "TV sound" ever. The HDMI goes into the receiver, and the receiver controls the output to everything else (TV, speakers, etc). The only way to output LPCM multichannel, Dolby TrueHD and DTS HDMA is via HDMI. It cannot be done via an optical cable. There just isn't the bandwidth for it. :P
 
I don't know what you're talking about. No one with a home theatre set up uses "TV sound" ever. The HDMI goes into the receiver, and the receiver controls the output to everything else (TV, speakers, etc). The only way to output LPCM multichannel, Dolby TrueHD and DTS HDMA is via HDMI. It cannot be done via an optical cable. There just isn't the bandwidth for it. :P


Sorry a little slow, I need another Mt. Dew... I'm using an older receiver, so I can't do it that way, so I'll adjust my statement to read: If your using a Dolby Digital 5.1 receiver without all teh bells and whistles, I recommend using the FO cord port directly to your receiver. my bad: (
 
But why? Just because they didn't get a Final Fantasy 12 CE?

Hey lets screw over the NA now! No CE for you! Thats dumb.. Isn't FF series sell more here? Oh well.
 
duckroll said:
That's only for blu-ray. Most PS3 games, especially Japanese ones do not support either. They output using LPCM. Although, any receiver which supports TrueHD or DTS-HDMA would most definitely also support LPCM. If your receiver supports LPCM multichannel, but not Dolby TrueHD or DTS HDMA, but you are using your PS3 as a blu-ray player, then the PS3 can decode both formats and output through LPCM anyway. So your receiver doesn't have to support those formats natively.
Im confused so what your saying is i cant get true HD or DTS HDMA out of my ps3 tho my receiver can output it ??
 
RPGCrazied said:
But why? Just because they didn't get a Final Fantasy 12 CE?

Hey lets screw over the NA now! No CE for you! Thats dumb.. Isn't FF series sell more here? Oh well.

Square Europe has been consistently giving consumers limited editions of games like FFXIII, Crisis Core, Dissidia Final Fantasy, Star Ocean 4... while the US didn't get anything comparable.

Special editions in the US are becoming a joke and retailers don't want to carry them because they more often than not lose money on them, especially if they sit on the shelf forever.
 
WickedLaharl said:
well i'm buying the 360 version no matter what because i love earning me some achievements! there, i said it! let the truth be known
that i'll also be getting the ps3 version as well. teehee.

Heheh, I actually plan to do the same thing, but I will wait until the PS3 version goes on sale.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom