• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Fresh Windows 10 Installation - Which secondary browser to go with?

Chrome. Yes it's a resource hog but from my experience FF is worse.

I'd love to say Edge but, like you said, it just isn't ready for prime-time. I've had several CTDs and some general fuckery the first few days I began using it. One time I closed the browser and upon reopening it opened every single tab I had ever opened the past day or so. I'm talking like 30 tabs of sites I had closed many, many hours prior. It just kept that shit in memory and vomited it on my screen for no reason.
 
The recent update of Firefox to work better with Windows 10 has been pretty good for me so I'll use it for now. I switch between it and Chrome but, come September I'm looking to move away from Chrome on a pretty permanent basis.
 
do you own stock from an ram manufacturer ?
that is the most overated bull i read all day.

4 gig is enough xD
heck i still do 6 gig ram no game uses it.
8+ is for video rendering ps music and rendering 3dsmax etc.

srsly chrome is a memory hog and all but 4gig is more than enough to handle it xD

extensions + many tabs opened.
 
Another vote for Chrome here. Plays nice with all the Microsoft cloud apps I use for work, so I haven't even had to use/try Edge. Having everything synced across all devices is what makes it the best for me. I'm a pretty casual user, but that feature alone makes it the only browser I ever use.
 
Opera - I started using it again, after abandoning the brand when they ditched Opera 12(old Opera was my main browser for years), and went a more Chrome route with a lot less features. It's gotten a lot better, no real complaints

Cyberfox - For some reason, It ran many things really well on an old shitty laptop of mine, especially HD video, so it gets some love from me.
 
I'm running Vivaldi as my main and Chrome as my secondary (both 64-bit).

Even though Vivaldi is not even on beta and buggy, it's still solid enough to be my main and has great features. On the case something don't work on Vivaldi, it generally works well in Chrome.

Vivaldi is what the new Opera should've been, yes.
 
I use 64-bit chrome and regularly open more tabs than anyone has a right to use, it's fin e on my laptop with 8gb of RAM.
 
Its about personal preference, i really hate the omnibox thing of chrome, i dont need to see my bookmarks constantly etc, for me firefox is way more customizable etc, but i use waterfox because of the 64 bit support.
 
I used FF a few years ago then I switched to Chrome for about 2 years. Chrome would just stop loading pages and GIFS would take a year to load them. So I had to switch back to FF. Sadly both browsers are in a bad shape currently.
 
Chrome. My Surface Pro 1 w/ 4 GBs of RAM has no problems running a dozen tabs open, several youtube videos, etc, open at once... on battery saving mode and only 85% of max CPU power.
 
Chrome + Firefox. I use Firefox as a primary browser and Chrome as a fallback / secondary one. Edge is a joke, I see no reason to use it whatsoever.
 
Chrome + Firefox. I use Firefox as a primary browser and Chrome as a fallback / secondary one. Edge is a joke, I see no reason to use it whatsoever.

I think the real test will be this fall when it is supposedly going to get extensions. It's still a lot better than IE. I don't think it's a bad browser for the normal people out there who haven't heard of ad block.
 
Been using Opera for awhile now after Chrome kept slowing down. Not sure if it's the best out there but it hasn't given me grief yet.
 
I've just given up on using anything else now, Edge does what I need it to do albeit without some addons that I would like to see. I did however install Firefox yesterday to complete an assignment for uni but that's all I've used it for so far.

Can't really go back to any other browser, Edge just works.
 
Chrome + Firefox. I use Firefox as a primary browser and Chrome as a fallback / secondary one. Edge is a joke, I see no reason to use it whatsoever.

For me Edge has FAR superior hardware acceleration. It's the only browser on my aging PC (Q6600 and GTX 670) that can handle twitch adequately
 
I think the real test will be this fall when it is supposedly going to get extensions. It's still a lot better than IE. I don't think it's a bad browser for the normal people out there who haven't heard of ad block.
It has already lost as it is tied to the Windows platform. It doesn't have the flexibility of Firefox or the performance of Chrome. I don't understand why would anyone use it really.

For me Edge has FAR superior hardware acceleration. It's the only browser on my aging PC (Q6600 and GTX 670) that can handle twitch adequately
That's strange considering that all browsers are using the exact same Direct2D layer for h/w acceleration on Windows. And isn't Twitch limited to 1080p streams? Your 670 should be able to handle these with ease. I think there's some misconfiguration in your Chrome / FF if that's the results you're getting.
 
I'm running Vivaldi as my main and Chrome as my secondary (both 64-bit).

Even though Vivaldi is not even on beta and buggy, it's still solid enough to be my main and has great features. On the case something don't work on Vivaldi, it generally works well in Chrome.

If simplicity is what you want, then Opera is a better Chrome. If you're more of an advanced user, then Vivaldi is the only really power user browser out there, although still in pre-beta.

Disclaimer: I work for Vivaldi and worked for Opera in the past, so I'm obviously biased.
 

Am I wrong?


What's the point of quoting me with this response? The benefits of RAM can't be boiled down to how many frames you get.

Benefits emerge when switching between applications without needing to use pagefiles (HDD space). Let's say I'm gaming with Chrome up on one monitor, Skype running in the background and resource hog of a game on the other and I want to shift between them regularly. I can guarantee more RAM is better.

Edit: On Topic: I've been using Chrome with no issues, but I haven't touched Firefox since around 2010. I've heard things have improved greatly since then.
 
For me Edge has FAR superior hardware acceleration. It's the only browser on my aging PC (Q6600 and GTX 670) that can handle twitch adequately

Yeah, the HTML5 video player in Edge must use hardware decode support in GPUs better than Chrome or Firefox. On my rickety old Phenom II I can't play 1080p60 videos on YouTube reliably in anything but Edge. And on 720p60 videos it only uses 3-4% CPU versus 30% with Chrome. It's the difference between being able to play a game with a video on my 2nd monitor with no performance penalty and not.
 
I've just given up on using anything else now, Edge does what I need it to do albeit without some addons that I would like to see. I did however install Firefox yesterday to complete an assignment for uni but that's all I've used it for so far.

Can't really go back to any other browser, Edge just works.

No ad block = no way. Sure, you can get around it by using host files and stuff, but eeeeh. A good ad blocker like uBlock is just so convenient.
 
Top Bottom