to your first point about higher degrees of concentrated vitamins in juice when compared to a piece of fruit: again, this is only because you're consuming the equivalent of five oranges' juice (just an approximation) in an average juice glass. hey, great, you say, more vitamins. but there's also more of the sugars that inevitably come with fruit juice.
to the second point about whether the fact that you actually have to eat a piece of fruit should be a consideration when making that decision, my contention--and that of pretty much any nutritionist i've ever read or spoken with--is that in the big battle of fruit versus fruit juice, the fruit is better to maintain health. there's a number of reasons for this, but the most obvious reason is that whole fruit has fiber, which makes you feel full; it also gives you the satisfaction of having eaten something. studies have been done that link "crunch" to satiety when discussing snacks, and so something like an apple (presuming you get a good one) serves the dual purpose of nourishing both your body and your brain, signaling to you that you've had a good snack.
and that's not "visible sugar" in the middle of a strawberry man, come on :lol
yes. thank you. the misinformation on the subject of fruit juices and their relative benefits is insane in this country. it's something that can be enjoyed in moderation, just like pepsi.