Essentially, you want the change from the status quo to be justified. That's a reasonable position to take, typically. However, I imagine the Republicans in Wisconsin would turn that around and ask that the status quo itself be justified. That would be my position, at least. What good reason is there to keep people from working when they want to unless they first get government's permission? I think that, at the very least, the fear of abuse should be substantiated before that infringement is considered justified.
And I'd like to see you prove this wouldn't be something to be abused. And you would go back and forth. At some point, I'd call you a poopyhead but probably apologize later!
I would feel more comfortable about this change if the Wisconsin legislature had statistics to back up why they felt this is a necessary change that we can debate. They don't. That worries me. I would then call for a study to measure it's effectiveness. I don't think that would pass, but now we're speaking in hypotheticals.