Ceebs said:The best thing about making the switch?
I upgraded to the Logitech G35 which are extremely uncomfortable during the first month, but you will get used to them, and they are kick ass.TheExodu5 said:Yeah the mic problem is annoying. What did you upgrade to, if I may ask? I'm looking for a better pair of comfortable headphones, with equal or better audio quality.
brain_stew said:Listen to this advice at your peril, its by far the worst recommendation in this thread. Stay far, far away. There's 9 speakers in them phones, by necessity each one of them has to be absolute trash, and since they're so close together the separation will be shit. Don't say I didn't warn you.
Wrekt said:If you've followed the thread, you realize this is a very loaded question. As soon as someone recommends a headset, someone else jumps out and says his equipment is shit. Then someone else comes out and insults his choice as well. Razor, Logitech, Sannheiser, Bose, Plantronics or Turtle Beach are always shit to someone on this board. It's a vicious cycle.
I honestly couldn't tell you the model I use. I'll be the first to admit that I don't listen close enough to tell the difference between some generic earbuds and a pair of $100 headphones. I bought a headset during a woot-off and they've worked out ok. They could be a little more comfortable but my mic never gets any static or feedback and the arm stays put. I went cheap because I hardly used them. Then I bought L4D2 and upgrading my headset has taken priority over upgrading my 4 year old computer.
godhandiscen said:I upgraded to the Logitech G35 which are extremely uncomfortable during the first month, but you will get used to them, and they are kick ass.
Sound quality has never been an issue for me, but many reviews say they are too soft, so I guess it is a problem with quality control. The only issue with the G35 is that the software acts funny every month or so, and I find myself having to re-install it. It is a PITA.
Other than that, I would recommend these:
http://www.astrogaming.com/products/detail/3/Audio-Systems/
I am getting them definitely during 2010.
Druz said:Don't buy a controller for your PC... you'd be missing the point entirely
Druz said:Don't buy a controller for your PC... you'd be missing the point entirely
brain_stew said:I assume this is a joke post? A 360 controller + Saturn USB are essential purchases for a PC gamer in my book.
TheExodu5 said:I'd get the Astros if they didn't charge like $150 to ship to Canada. Ridiculous.
Meh, I'll probably not switch from my Plantronics 770 until they die. Sound is decent (almost as good as the Sennhsier PC151 I used to have). Extremely comfortable. Even though the mic is super low (as in, below my jaw), it sounds just fine.
Batman with a controller on my TV is so awesome <3 Sometimes I even forget I'm on a PC aside from the Anti-Aliasing / model / texture quality.Druz said:If he wants to play emulators, sure. Otherwise there is no way that a controller is "essential".
Druz said:If he wants to play emulators, sure. Otherwise there is no way that a controller is "essential".
zon said:If you want a good PC, you only need to spend 1k (high end cpu/gpu, one hard drive etc).
If you want a monster PC, you have to spend ~3k.
Unless you have a steady stream of income, or a decent amount of savings, I wouldn't go for the 'monster'.
The Saturn pad is definitely my preferred control method in Street Fighter IV. It's also great with indie games.Druz said:If he wants to play emulators, sure. Otherwise there is no way that a controller is "essential".
Druz said:If he wants to play emulators, sure. Otherwise there is no way that a controller is "essential".
brain_stew said:Of course it is, there's a whole bunch of games that play better on a controller. Why gimp the controls in a game when you don't have to? This isn't console gaming, you get to choose how you play your games on the PC.
zon said:If you want a good PC, you only need to spend 1k (high end cpu/gpu, one hard drive etc).
If you want a monster PC, you have to spend ~3k.
Unless you have a steady stream of income, or a decent amount of savings, I wouldn't go for the 'monster'.
Scipius said:Because for some of us, a PC game that is best played with a controller is not a proper PC game, but a console port. If the game is properly adapted for the PC, it will be playable with keyboard and mouse. The major PC game franchises (FPS, RTS, RPG, etc) all control better with kb/m. Emulators, particularly console emulators, naturally require a controller.
Racing games should be played with a wheel, of course.
Fragamemnon said:The only way I could see getting up past 3k is some multi-GPU monstrousity with some sort of ridonkulous eyefinity setup. In other words, complete and foolish overkill.
Personally I think OP has it kinda wrong-you get hooked on a game THEN you decide you gotta play other PC games like it and expand from there, not decide one day that you want to game on the PC. The games drive the platform which in turn drives the hardware, in my book. Some people love their gear but it's always a backseat to the software available on the PC, at least for me.
o_0TacticalFox88 said:Well I'm crossing over to the darkside. I have 4k now to spend. And I've decided to become a PC gamer. Not exclusively, but yeah I want to play every game no matter what platform it comes out on. So yeah, I need help choosing the type of PC and starting games I need. So far only two games are on my mind: Crysis and Company of Heroes. I have 4k to spend and want to spend it wisely, and where I can get my money's worth.
brain_stew said:I stand by the assertion that a gamepad is an essential purchase for any serious PC gamer, an Xbox 360 pad specifically.
Scipius said:Wrong obviously, because many "serious" PC gamers are not even interested in the type of games that are best played with a controller (i.e. console ports). Someone who is primarily interested in e.g. FPS or RTS (of which there is an abundance on the PC) does not need a controller.
Some of us don't want to degrade our PCs to become an oversized X-Box. That's what the little set-top boxes are for. Right now the concession for some games is that you will need the controller, but we're already seeing more and more of the console restrictions and bullshit invading PC gaming.
If you want a monster PC, you have to spend ~3k.
brain_stew said:So you buy games that play better on a joypad on your console instead? How exactly do you benefit from that? Give me a ÂŁ15 saving on game prices and much better performance and graphics every time. A PC is what you want it to be, and that's why its such a great platform, its the jack of all trades and the master of them all to boot.
Forgetting that, what about the bunch of indie titles that appear up on Steam and the like? Do you just ignore all the ones that play better on a controller, just because? Any 3D title where you move your avatar independent of the camera is prone to playing better on a controller, and I don't think that leaves just console "ports" (that word in itself is rather misleading, anyway).
An ÂŁ18 purchase that will improve your experience in a bunch of games, seems a fair deal to me. If you can justyf a ÂŁ50+ wheel for a single genre, why not a pad?
God, do you suck.Scipius said:What I object to is the idea that one needs a controller for current PC games. One doesn't or rather, one shouldn't. Only if you use emulators, or if you insist on playing console ports, like you do.
Any properly adapted 3D game will work just fine with kb/m. The fact that PC games sometimes indeed work better with a controller is not an indication of the quality of the controller as an input device, but rather an indication of a lazy developer not wanting to dedicate the resources to implementing different controls. Hence why "port" is entirely the right word. I suspect though that what we consider "playing better" may differ; once you have a controller you're more inclined to use it, even if the game will work just fine with kb/m.
Price is not the issue. A proper PC experience is. I consider the X-Box 360 to be an inferior hardware platform and it irks me that people are encouraging developers to treat the PC as a souped-up 360, thereby dragging the PC down to its level. What I don't want is for developers to assume that a controller is now "standard" for PC gaming. The PC can do better than that. Don't buy console ports if they're substandard work.
Druz said:If he wants to play emulators, sure. Otherwise there is no way that a controller is "essential".
Poohblaster said:If your spending more than 1k on a build you're probably paying for speed that could be handled by overclocking.
Fixed1979 said:Or paying for speed and then overclocking it...
People who only play two genres don't need a controller. Gotcha.Scipius said:Wrong obviously, because many "serious" PC gamers are not even interested in the type of games that are best played with a controller (i.e. console ports). Someone who is primarily interested in e.g. FPS or RTS (of which there is an abundance on the PC) does not need a controller.
Some of us don't want to degrade our PCs to become an oversized X-Box. That's what the little set-top boxes are for. Right now the concession for some games is that you will need the controller, but we're already seeing more and more of the console restrictions and bullshit invading PC gaming.
I want to see the build for this 3k monster. I'm assuming the largest SSD money can buy + 3D Vision?zon said:If you want a good PC, you only need to spend 1k (high end cpu/gpu, one hard drive etc).
If you want a monster PC, you have to spend ~3k.
Unless you have a steady stream of income, or a decent amount of savings, I wouldn't go for the 'monster'.
Scipius said:What I object to is the idea that one needs a controller for current PC games. One doesn't or rather, one shouldn't. Only if you use emulators, or if you insist on playing console ports, like you do.
Any properly adapted 3D game will work just fine with kb/m. The fact that PC games sometimes indeed work better with a controller is not an indication of the quality of the controller as an input device, but rather an indication of a lazy developer not wanting to dedicate the resources to implementing different controls. Hence why "port" is entirely the right word. I suspect though that what we consider "playing better" may differ; once you have a controller you're more inclined to use it, even if the game will work just fine with kb/m.
Price is not the issue. A proper PC experience is. I consider the X-Box 360 to be an inferior hardware platform and it irks me that people are encouraging developers to treat the PC as a souped-up 360, thereby dragging the PC down to its level. What I don't want is for developers to assume that a controller is now "standard" for PC gaming. The PC can do better than that. Don't buy console ports if they're substandard work.
Scipius said:What I object to is the idea that one needs a controller for current PC games. One doesn't or rather, one shouldn't. Only if you use emulators, or if you insist on playing console ports, like you do.
Any properly adapted 3D game will work just fine with kb/m. The fact that PC games sometimes indeed work better with a controller is not an indication of the quality of the controller as an input device, but rather an indication of a lazy developer not wanting to dedicate the resources to implementing different controls. Hence why "port" is entirely the right word. I suspect though that what we consider "playing better" may differ; once you have a controller you're more inclined to use it, even if the game will work just fine with kb/m.
Scipius said:What I object to is the idea that one needs a controller for current PC games. One doesn't or rather, one shouldn't. Only if you use emulators, or if you insist on playing console ports, like you do.
Any properly adapted 3D game will work just fine with kb/m. The fact that PC games sometimes indeed work better with a controller is not an indication of the quality of the controller as an input device, but rather an indication of a lazy developer not wanting to dedicate the resources to implementing different controls. Hence why "port" is entirely the right word. I suspect though that what we consider "playing better" may differ; once you have a controller you're more inclined to use it, even if the game will work just fine with kb/m.
Price is not the issue. A proper PC experience is. I consider the X-Box 360 to be an inferior hardware platform and it irks me that people are encouraging developers to treat the PC as a souped-up 360, thereby dragging the PC down to its level. What I don't want is for developers to assume that a controller is now "standard" for PC gaming. The PC can do better than that. Don't buy console ports if they're substandard work.
Firestorm said:Since it's fun to go wild. A build without thinking about budget:
Total: $2725
Man. There's still more money I could be using here! Add some Noctua case fans? =P
brain_stew said:How the hell do you spend $3k on a PC anyway? And no, buying Intel extreme processors doesn't count, considering a OCed $200 CPU will outperform them by some margin.