Squirrel Killer said:Those poor skiers.
No they are gorgeous. Actually you might have shot yourself in the foot!The_Inquisitor said:I took this photo outdoors today and did a little post processing. I submitted it to the decay assignment thread. This is my first time post-processing. Did I overdo it?
Celery&Lager said:No they are gorgeous. Actually you might have shot yourself in the foot!
Futureman said:Do you guys ever feel sick of trying to make things look pretty?
I don't know if that's a weird thing to think or feel, but I feel like it's a frustrating aspect of photography to always be trying to make things look beautiful or interesting when that doesn't necessarily mirror reality.
meh.
guess said:
aidan said:Guess, what ISO did you take that at? It's got a weird texture to it.
chaostrophy said:Chicago after the snow a couple of weeks ago:
yeah, 400Chorazin said:I'm not Guess, but according to the EXIF reader I installed in Chrome it's at 400.
I actually didn't even notice the texture when I posted the image. I can only see it from certain angles on my laptop lcd.aidan said:Guess, what ISO did you take that at? It's got a weird texture to it.
killertofu said:This thread makes me depressed that I don't have time to shoot
mrkgoo said:ALso, I feel RAW is still a little overkill for a lot of my shots. I think I'm going to work in a bit of both JPEG and RAW into my usual workflow.
Menelaus said:I'm the same way. When I transitioned from an XTi to my 5D, I switched to RAW exclusively. Yes, every image MUST be edited in some way now, but I'll take the massive flexibility RAW provides over JPEG any day.
Because I don't need every image to take up 25 MB. So I see my cat sleeping in a funny position and snap 4 images - bam, 100 MB.Chorazin said:I'm not sure why you wouldn't just shoot in RAW all the time. It's going to look just as good as the jpeg at the moment you snap the pic, with the bonus of being way, way more editable if something was screwy you didn't notice in the field. I guess maybe if space is a concern....
I guess I"m just a RAW guy because I've shot in RAW from the moment I got my D40, never used JPEG.
hEist said:thinkin' about to start a "project 52 weeks", to kick myself to take more photos.
365 is a bit too hard, i think.
anyone doing something like this (52weeks/365 days)?
the_log_ride said:Tried last year. 'Got about 150ish days into it, and couldn't keep up. Trying again this year, but already failing.
hEist said:yeah thinking the same about 365 days, so my 2nd thought was to try 52weeks instead,then i have more time.
ugh no way i could do that, i take too many as it is.hEist said:thinkin' about to start a "project 52 weeks", to kick myself to take more photos.
365 is a bit too hard, i think.
anyone doing something like this (52weeks/365 days)?
The_Inquisitor said:Hey Mrkgoo, I am applying the new update to Aperture 3. Did you see a huge difference in performance?
mrkgoo said:Yeah, feels a bit more robust. I haven't used as heavily and I did do a rebuild of my library afterwards, but its' fairly smooth sailing. I think it fixed the memory leaks, plus it does feel a bit snappier.
I've also since discovered that some of my performance is due to the large iPhoto Library I have - even if I just rename the folder that my 900 project folders are in, it takes 45 minutes to resolve, and another 45 to update on exit.
At first, I thought it was hanging, but I gave it a good hour on beachball, and it resolved (I've noticed that the database rebuilding takes around 45 minutes too). Don't know if 3.0.1 resolved it better or if I should just be waiting, but I do 'feel' that 3.0.1 is a bit more stable. No crashes yet.
The_Inquisitor said:Hum I am pretty sure I updated to 3.0.2 today. Maybe check software update?
captive said:ugh no way i could do that, i take too many as it is.
These guys are doing it and so far they have some amazing stuff and some of it i find meh
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Todd-and-Brad-Reed-Photography/76033885410
mrkgoo said:You are confusing me greatly. You ask me about the update, so I tell you about it, then you tell me about it.
Anyway, there was a RAW compatibility update, but not one for Aperture, I believe. I 'll go check, though.
hookedonritalin said:GO Train shots
Chorazin said:I had my camera with me when I hit up Starbucks for a coffee and a read and thought this would make a cool shot.
The_Inquisitor said:So question photo GAF. I have decided to go back through and keyword my photos. I upload all my photos to Flickr. The problem is is that I don't think I can sync my Flickr keywords back to the photos. Plus some flick uploads were done in iPhoto before i got Aperture. Do I need to basically go through my photos twice and update the pictures?\
Honestly if I have to double up, I will probably do it in just Flickr. I store my aperture library on my external HDD, so Flickr is really the only resource always with me.
Futureman said:
I wanna do something else here, maybe a naked lady.
Futureman said:
I wanna do something else here, maybe a naked lady.