YOU'RE the write for Gaming in the Clinton Years??AstroLad said:I dunno man, I don't think it takes that much effort.
My Review of Water Warfare, After Zero Plays
Water Warfare is a compelling first-person shooter title for Nintendo's "Wii Ware" system. First-person shooter games are most commonly associated with World War II or The Future, and the words "first-person shooter" might bring brief arousal, or at least curiosity, to the system's long-suffering older Nintendofans looking for at least an ersatz Killzone or Halo. But such arousal would be misplaced here.
It turns out that while the game purports to be an FPS, it is only one in name, and not in spirit. Gone is the amazing arsenal from Resistance or the hellish nightmarescape from Doom. Those essential features of any FPS have instead been replaced by squirt guns and water balloons, and the "Beach," and "Playground" maps. You don't "frag" your opponents, you simply get them wet. What is perhaps most frustrating is that the game often misleads users into thinking the experience will be far more mature than it really is. For example, we were unable to cause a single death in our hours of playtesting the so-called "Death Match" mode. Even using the Wii Zapper had very little actual effect on the gameplay. If you are expecting a Modern Warfare-type experience, you will be sorely disappointed, and your Fun Factor will very likely be sub-zero, as mine was (editor's note: when a game receives a score below zero in any of our three ratings categories, such as Fun Factor, then the points below zero are deducted equally from the two other categories--Sound and Graphics).
Fun Factor: -1.0 (out of 5.0).
Now for the important stuff: the Graphics. Nintendo fans have by now been conditioned to expect almost nothing from the Wii's graphics, instead pointing to the system's revolutionary distinguishing features, such as games where you use water pistols instead of guns. And this game continues in that proud tradition. By far the closest analogues for this game's graphics are virtual-reality games from the early 90s, such as Dactyl Nightmare, which you may remember from numerous GamePro TV episodes starring J.D. Roth. As much as I would love to instead make the comparison to Nintendo's Virtual Boy games, they had much cleaner and more attractive graphics.
Graphics: 1.0.
The game's Sound quality may be its only saving grace. Water Warfare boasts the trademark 8-bit ditties that Hudson is loved for. The songs are so catchy that I might be motivated to give the game a 4.0 for Sound, were it not for the leftover negative Fun Factor points. My only two major complaints are that the realistic footstep sounds (perhaps the only realistic and gritty part of the game) are not made when you are walking sideways, something which really takes you out of the game. Also, the squirt gun sounds more like a laser gun than a squirt gun, yet another feature inhibiting suspension of disbelief.
Sound: 3.5.
Conclusion: 4.0
Darklord said:People are angry at the OP because he pointed out a reviewer who was a lazy, stealing, fool and could have potentially gotten GamePro into deep shit? What are you, idiots? It's the number 1 rule in his field of work. It would be like a Chef serving raw chicken.
I'm embarrassed to say that it took me almost a year after MM came out before I got that.webrunner said:It's Tatl Tael
Unless Zelda was a LIE
Fuzzy said:I'm embarrassed to say that it took me almost a year after MM came out before I got that.
Hey, maybe the poor guy idolized Doris Kearns Goodwin and Stephen Ambrose.Cyan said:Any writer should know that if you get caught plagiarizing, you pay the price.
Holy shit.webrunner said:It's Tatl Tael
Unless Zelda was a LIE
JSnake said:FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCKKKKKK I JUST GOT IT
There were people in that mind-blowing stuff thread who didn't get that the Biggoron Sword in OoT was made by a Big Goron.alistairw said:smh
Seriously? How could you not have noticed...eh. Never mind.
as a kid I read it as bigger-on swordEmCeeGramr said:There were people in that mind-blowing stuff thread who didn't get that the Biggoron Sword in OoT was made by a Big Goron.
I'm not even joking.
C'mon you guys, even I know plagiarism is a big no-no. Jesus christ.nincompoop said::lol
Would be funnier if shagg_187 edited his post to say that though.
webrunner said:It's Tatl Tael
Unless Zelda was a LIE
It's okay you're young.JSnake said:FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCKKKKKK I JUST GOT IT
Ok, what's your excuse?Tathanen said:HOLY SHIT
MidnightScott said:I swear us gaffers don't plagiarize when we write reviews for free. But people who get paid to write reviews plagiarize.
Gaming Journalism is 100% reliable, especially when you have companies buying out game reviews, and people plagiarizing. We just need to start a NeoGAF website, and have the whole forum participate. We can have editors who can filter through any of the shit that comes about
Welcome to the thread.AFreak said:Maybe IGn plagiarized GamePro's review.
EmCeeGramr said:There were people in that mind-blowing stuff thread who didn't get that the Biggoron Sword in OoT was made by a Big Goron.
I'm not even joking.
Jaded Alyx said:Welcome to the thread.
MidnightScott said:I swear us gaffers don't plagiarize when we write reviews for free. But people who get paid to write reviews plagiarize.
Gaming Journalism is 100% reliable, especially when you have companies buying out game reviews, and people plagiarizing. We just need to start a NeoGAF website, and have the whole forum participate. We can have editors who can filter through any of the shit that comes about
AllMusic sells their content out to places like Columbia House etc to make money. I still have reviews floating around on About.com, Blockbuster.com etc from when I did game reviews for their gaming side.TheChillyAcademic said:Eh, so does itunes from AllMusic, everything's connected anyway
W.........TF?!!!!!No its not :lol :lolshagg_187 said:Yes. I know plagiarism is a big deal and it's a bigger deal if you copy/paste your own work a year later. Plagiarizing yourself is also plagiarism in professional field and Daemon Hatfield is fond of plagiarizing himself.
Plagiarism software that professors use?jarosh said:eh, this seems like one hell of a coincidence.
black stuff is identical. how likely is it that someone would word these sentences almost EXACTLY the same, talking about the same game, within a matter of days?
maybe there's some secret pr fact sheet that was handed out to reviewers that we don't know about, but otherwise i think the case is pretty clear.
Dave D. said:If anything good comes out of this, I hope it's Gamepro's new company-wide policy making turnitin.com mandatory for all article submissions.
Also, let's recap. This guy got fired because of this... thing. How do you think he feels right now?
BlackGoku03 said:Plagiarism software that professors use?
I think that's just Word.GameGamer said:Lawyers use the same comparison software(s).
pakkit said:How stupid do you have to be to plagiarize IGN? That'd be like plagiarizing Wikipedia on your term paper. You WILL get caught.
That too.Musashi Wins! said:I was thinking it was more the shame of copying that level of writing.
:lol That was my first thought, but since the Gamepro reviewer admitted to it and got fired... I guess the IGN guy got lucky this time.Jetku said:are we sure that they both didn't just reword some portions of the fact sheet included with the review copy..?
*raises hand*EmCeeGramr said:There were people in that mind-blowing stuff thread who didn't get that the Biggoron Sword in OoT was made by a Big Goron.
I'm not even joking.
Firestorm said:Ok, what's your excuse?