• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Gamergate targeting victims of Patreon hack

GamerGate only became especially angry and indignant once the threads got banned and people migrated to a new treehouse. It was rather self-contained and tame when it started out.

Real niggas posted in Lanky Kong threads anyway.

You have a very weird definition of tame.
 
Thanks for proving the exact point I was making. This is why I can't take Gamergate threads seriously.



Speaking of drive-by shit-posting, good to see mods leading by example.
tumblr_inline_mhv5q3YhW01qz4rgp.gif
 
I think the best part is that literally the last thread he posted in before this one was about the "Star Citizen/Escapist" thing where he accuses Neogaf of acting like Gamergate.

1376350204667.gif
Honestly, his entire post history is fascinating because 80% of it is him being a shithead.
 
It's actually really really bad for your pets to dye their fur. It can damage their livers, cause skin diseases, etc. Not to mention potential psychological harm one might be causing the animal. Any vets or groomers worth their salt will tell you not to do this.

Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.

Carry on.

Yeah, this is true. Dyeing an animal is really fucking irresponsible.
 
Always thought gamergate was about journalism ethics but never really paid attention to it.
Didn't know it was mostly a hate group, didn't really care to find out.

That aside, the Sarah Nyberg being a child predator is fucking cold crazy.
People defending her over wanting to fuck kids are equally horrible people.
 
Always thought gamergate was about journalism ethics but never really paid attention to it.
Didn't know it was mostly a hate group, didn't really care to find out.

That aside, the Sarah Nyberg being a child predator is fucking cold crazy.
People defending her over wanting to fuck kids are equally horrible people.

...reading's not your strong suit, is it
 
Whatever GamerGate stood for when it began is cloudy. I never paid attention to it, so Idk. Someone people claim the intentions weren't at all malicious and everything became fucked, others claim it was a shitshow from the start.

My point being, these people, whichever group they think they apart of, whatever cause they think they stand for, they're just assholes. It's not gamergate, it's not whatevergate, it's "assholes that think they stand for something."
 
Always thought gamergate was about journalism ethics but never really paid attention to it.
Didn't know it was mostly a hate group, didn't really care to find out.

That aside, the Sarah Nyberg being a child predator is fucking cold crazy.
People defending her over wanting to fuck kids are equally horrible people.
Oh boy.
 
Always thought gamergate was about journalism ethics but never really paid attention to it.
Didn't know it was mostly a hate group, didn't really care to find out.

That aside, the Sarah Nyberg being a child predator is fucking cold crazy.
People defending her over wanting to fuck kids are equally horrible people.

The accusation and the proof are two separate things. The accusation is enough for Gaters but most reasonable people want the other.

See: the letter to the where he says she is a child predator but even Breitbart uses "claimed."
 
Always thought gamergate was about journalism ethics but never really paid attention to it.
Didn't know it was mostly a hate group, didn't really care to find out.

That aside, the Sarah Nyberg being a child predator is fucking cold crazy.
People defending her over wanting to fuck kids are equally horrible people.

Try to be less obvious next time.
 
I guess not. Didn't know enough about it but had read the breibart site.
Saw gamergate threads on here and never checked it out up until that breibart report.
My bad

Gamergate is trying their hardest to destroy the lives of the people who oppose them and/or what GG considers to be online feminism in general.
 
Always thought gamergate was about journalism ethics but never really paid attention to it.
Didn't know it was mostly a hate group, didn't really care to find out.

That aside, the Sarah Nyberg being a child predator is fucking cold crazy.
People defending her over wanting to fuck kids are equally horrible people.

"Maybe if I preface my post by pretending to act like I've never followed Gamergate, I can evade being banned for repeating Gamergate propaganda!"
 

Chat logs from an IRC room I was in nearly a decade ago were leaked to gamergate. To say the contents of those logs were not flattering would be putting it lightly. They are, in some ways, much what you’d expect from an early-2000’s chatroom of 4chan expats trying too hard to outdo each other for shock value. Even with that context, much of what I said was gross and disturbing, and I have no interest in defending it. Since then, I’ve learned that intent isn’t magic, and a playground of the taboo isn’t particularly conducive to moral growth. That I’ve grown past the person I was back then is something I am deeply and forever thankful for.
So was her posts on IRC about wanting to have sex with kids fake or real? Or because no crime was commited & because she was younger, trying to 'one up another' IRC user, it was all ok?
 
So was her posts on IRC about wanting to have sex with kids fake or real? Or because no crime was commited & because she was younger, trying to 'one up another' IRC user, it was all ok?

"Hi I don't know anything about gamergate but let me attack this person they are attacking."
 
Yeah, this is true. Dyeing an animal is really fucking irresponsible.

It's awful and I don't condone it as a fellow animal owner/lover, but really it has nothing to do with "SJWs", journalism ethics and whatnot. It's just obviously a means to defame someone opposed to them.
 
So was her posts on IRC about wanting to have sex with kids fake or real? Or because no crime was commited & because she was younger, trying to 'one up another' IRC user, it was all ok?

So crazy. I have no idea what I wrote 10 years ago in some chat room. If you showed me a log of anything.

Dr.Acula: Man, the Leafs really suck.

I couldn't confirm or deny that.

Oh. you have the IP logs? Well shit, that was like 3 ISPs ago and my IP isn't static anyway. Plus it's a chat room, anyone can use my name.

Srsly.

Go Shaggy defence on that "it wasn't me."
 
So was her posts on IRC about wanting to have sex with kids fake or real? Or because no crime was commited & because she was younger, trying to 'one up another' IRC user, it was all ok?

I don't know what you mean by "ok", but it's not something you should be sending emails about to an illegally circulated list of Randi Harper's Patreon supporters. Please try to stay on topic.
 
So was her posts on IRC about wanting to have sex with kids fake or real? Or because no crime was commited & because she was younger, trying to 'one up another' IRC user, it was all ok?

She's never shown any evidence of being a pedophile and has stated she regretted acting that way online in those IRC logs that are over a decade old. She was young and acted stupid online, what a game-changer :/

Please try to stay on topic.

It'll refrain from getting into this side-topic as well from now on.
 
She's never shown any evidence of being a pedophile and has stated she regretted acting that way online in those IRC logs that are over a decade old. She was young and acted stupid online, what a game-changer :/

I'm sure most of the people criticizing her for this shit probably posted stuff just as awful on /b/ at some point in their life.
 
So crazy. I have no idea what I wrote 10 years ago in some chat room. If you showed me a log of anything.



I couldn't confirm or deny that.

Oh. you have the IP logs? Well shit, that was like 3 ISPs ago and my IP isn't static anyway. Plus it's a chat room, anyone can use my name.

Srsly.

Go Shaggy defence on that "it wasn't me."

She doesn't deny the chat logs being hers. I'm not pro-pedo, but she wanted to have sex with a relative under age. Was fixated on the idea and talked about it in detail with other people interested in kids aged 7-9 years old. Theer is no law against these thoughts so there was no legal action taken.

If you can say " Hey I probably takled about wanting to molest kids 10 years ago, sorry about that, I'm all good now." It's far from normal.
Not to mention hinting about literal CP. Again, not normal.

I'm the prick harassing someone though by mentioning something sounds really fishy about this person? I don't support harasssment, and I definitely don't support CP or acts of sexual nature towards children.
 
I have very esoteric tastes. Let me tell you about my notepad collection.



Wait. Are you accusing me of trying to score points against Randi Harper? ...you do know I'm the op of this thread, right?

Pretty sure they were talking about GG/the sender of the e-mails, not you.
 
She's never shown any evidence of being a pedophile and has stated she regretted acting that way online in those IRC logs that are over a decade old. She was young and acted stupid online, what a game-changer :/
This has absolutely nothing to do with gaming beside about a bunch of #GGers acting like well. #GGers. But I'm not going to defend "edgelords". This is gonna get way too personal for me. Nope. I'm out, sorry.
 
are you serious right now

does this happen with all GG threads?

Yes, gators came up with this brilliant plan, where they pretend to not know anything about GG, and be a 'normie' and just innocently skirt around 'ethics in game journalism'

They lovingly refer to it as 'operation volcano'. They think its super secret.
 
She doesn't deny the chat logs being hers. I'm not pro-pedo, but she wanted to have sex with a relative under age. Was fixated on the idea and talked about it in detail with other people interested in kids aged 7-9 years old. Theer is no law against these thoughts so there was no legal action taken.

If you can say " Hey I probably takled about wanting to molest kids 10 years ago, sorry about that, I'm all good now." It's far from normal.
Not to mention hinting about literal CP. Again, not normal.

I'm the prick harassing someone though by mentioning something sounds really fishy about this person? I don't support harasssment, and I definitely don't support CP or acts of sexual nature towards children.

I asked nicely once. Stay on topic. Here, I'll help: Gamergate targeting victims of Patreon hack
 
So was her posts on IRC about wanting to have sex with kids fake or real? Or because no crime was commited & because she was younger, trying to 'one up another' IRC user, it was all ok?
People say foolish things online with their name attached to it. It's not okay and we can certainly hold people to task who make inconsiderate, disrespectful, immoral, crass, damaging, and hurtful statements.

While saying something in the quoted IRC chat logs is not acceptable, it does not immediately mean somebody is a pedophile, a child stalker, or mean they deserve to have the entirety of their life based on said fucked up statements.

What was said, was said. A legit reflection since then has occurred by the offending party. Personal changes in attitude have happened based on that person's life experiences. Nobody was in any real or even perceived danger.

They point isn't "it's completely okay for people to be edgelords on the internet" the point is "sometimes people say stupid stuff for dumb reasons, realize it was dumb, and shouldn't have their life ruined over it." Based on Sarah's discussion on the topic, I'm willing to bet it was a stupid kid being a stupid kid, just on the internet so it exists forever.

Either way, emailing people threats regarding their job is unacceptable.

I asked nicely once. Stay on topic.

My apologies, I just saw this. I'll drop it.
 
Top Bottom