People have been ranting about female designs for years, it just never quite boiled up tot he top of the community till pretty recently.
I remember plenty of snark for old RPGs with fanservicy characters back in the day. Remember when Champions of Norrath had a girly calender as a pre-order bonus, along with scores of jiggling, scantly clad girls in game? there was quite a bit of folks who commented negatively about all that.
I think most of us realize this is a problem but we don't think this game is the right target.
That's good! That's the debate that people should be having, whether it should be held to the same standard. The issue is that people try to dismiss that discussion by pretending that it's about free speech, censorship, the supposed right of an artist to not have their work criticised (lol), etc.I don't think sexualised characters should fall to those same standards of acceptability, especially not in the context of a niche project.
Reads like a YouTube comment.
New lows hit here. Even for GAF.
This game is in fact a wrong target, because all three of its female characters have wildly different character designs, with a different philosophy behind them. There has been put thought into characters, which is what I assumed (and still think) feminists want.
Yes you are right, and I am free, in turn, to call the complaints illegitimate.Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from criticism or consequence, it just means no government censorship. The rest of us are more then free to rip them a new one, so to speak.
Industry veteran Art director with a unique style that's heading up his own games...vs some dime a dozen zbrush slave that works for shithouse gearbox of all places.
Is this real life?
I think most of us realize this is a problem but we don't think this game is the right target.
Don't remember that calendar but the Champions games were amazing.
Only image I could find of the calendar:
![]()
Yes you are right, and I am free, in turn, to call the complaints illegitimate.
Fuck Kotaku for making this an issue, buncha of low life hacks.
Industry veteran Art director with a unique style that's heading up his own games...vs some dime a dozen zbrush slave that works for shithouse gearbox of all places.
Is this real life?
Playing catchup on the thread, but it seems the point she was trying to make was that the sexualized character designs will put women off to this game, and gaming altogether as a hobby.
My wife doesn't play games, so I showed her the sorceress character. Her response was as follows:
"Cool, what type of magic can she do?"
So then I explained to her the controversey and what this Gearbox artist had to say. Her response was as follows:
"It's a fantasy game, I mean, putting aside that an artist is bashing someone else's art, I have more of a problem with someone generalizing all women to say we would or should be offended by it. Also its art, so you are telling others they shouldn't appreciate it because you're projecting some meaning that's not there. It's messed up. Did it get cancelled?"
Me: No
Wife: "Good, it's a stupid argument."
Yeah. It feels like opposite day for me, considering I'm usually one of the ones arguing about sexism in games. I just can't see why Dragon's Crown is the target and not, I dunno, nearly every AAA game with a female character in it. There is some straight up stupid sexist garbage in a lot of games, but it just seems weird to pile onto Dragon's Crown. I'm surprised Far Cry 3 got by so unscathed.
It's especially weird given that the sorceress is one character in the game, not the entirety of how it portrays women.
Also, people attacking the artist in the OP's comments because of her looks? WWOOOOOOOWWWWWW.
People were attacking her because of her looks? I posted on page one and came back to like... page 15 so I missed a lot. I don't feel like reading it all, my head will start spinning :\
Yeah. It feels like opposite day for me, considering I'm usually one of the ones arguing about sexism in games. I just can't see why Dragon's Crown is the target and not, I dunno, nearly every AAA game with a female character in it. There is some straight up stupid sexist garbage in a lot of games, but it just seems weird to pile onto Dragon's Crown.
It's especially weird given that the sorceress is one character in the game, not the entirety of how it portrays women.
Granted, he wasn't singing.To the best of my knowledge it's not illegal to put a blackfaced minstrel in a movie now, but nobody does it.
What do you expect? By criticizing it it seems to imply "this shouldn't exist" even if we know that you aren't actually gathering all the copies in the square and burning them.True, but a lot of folks seem to think that by criticizing X, we are somehow censoring X. I see this every day, not just in this debate.
Wife: "It's a fantasy game, I mean, putting aside that an artist is bashing someone else's art, I have more of a problem with someone generalizing all women to say we would or should be offended by it. Also its art, so you are telling others they shouldn't appreciate it because you're projecting some meaning that's not there. It's messed up. Did it get cancelled?"
Me: No
Wife: "Good, it's a stupid argument."
The extent to which Dragon's Crown has been controversial has been almost entirely a function of people reacting to perceived outrage rather than many people being legitimately offended by it. The "controversy" directed at Dragon's Crown has consisted of:
- A snarky, insulting two-paragraph blog post on Kotaku with an explicit call to stop
- A handful of message board posters criticizing the style but not calling for censorship
- This forum post from a Gearbox employee criticizing the style but not calling for censorship
If that's what constitutes "dogpiling" and "censorship" then we might as well nuke every message board on the Internet. If that's all it takes to make people feel irrationally attacked and get on the defensive over something that they aren't even associated with, then the outrage truly is misplaced, but not in the way they think it is.
no sorceress gifs yet? we need to have the evidence on the table.
What do you expect? By criticizing it it seems to imply "this shouldn't exist" even if we know that you aren't actually gathering all the copies in the square and burning them.
The amazon's far stupider than the sorceress.
What do you expect? By criticizing it it seems to imply "this shouldn't exist" even if we know that you aren't actually gathering all the copies in the square and burning them.
And you know what? Dragon's Crown - and many things with similar content- should exist, as they are now, untouched.
Even the suggestion that its wrong from a feminist standpoint makes me bristle. It's normal, it's healthy entertainment, it serves a need in the human experience.
In my ideal world, this game exists side by side with all the progressive content that anyone in this thread ever dreamed of.
Attacking something that people actually might like is going to harm your point, every time. Focus on what you want to see, because hating on what you don't will just launch you into a battle with those who enjoy it.
That misses the subtlety of what I'm saying. No one thinks anything is immune to criticism.Better shut down NeoGAF. And all message boards. And all user review sections. Actually the entire concept of reviews altogether.
I wonder if all this negative publicity might end up helping the game.
Granted, he wasn't singing.
The amazon's far stupider than the sorceress.
As a feminist, and general lover of art, Dragon's Crown is the kind of game I want to see. People putting thought into their lore, universe, characters etc. This game is doing things right but it's getting punished for not doing the "right kind of right". That's incredibly sad to see, as I expect more from people who present themselves as knowledgeable on these kinds of deconstructions.
No, that's been a discussion that's been ongoing for years. Not really centered around that character though. Just the absurdity of fantasy women's armor always taking the form of a metal bikini.I find it hilarious there is a new "debate/issue" with dragon's crown's character designs almost everyday.
Fironia Vie from Everquest never got this much vitriol but I guess she didn't have a D+ cupsize so nobody cared?
That misses the subtlety of what I'm saying. No one thinks anything is immune to criticism.
But saying "this game is offensive and bad 'for the industry'" is implicitly a statement implying "it shouldn't exist - not like this"
You don't have to actually be censoring it for people to respond in defense of the game's existence.
I find it hilarious there is a new "debate/issue" with dragon's crown's character designs almost everyday.
Fironia Vie from Everquest never got this much vitriol but I guess she didn't have a D+ cupsize so nobody cared?
Even the suggestion that its wrong from a feminist standpoint makes me bristle. It's normal, it's healthy entertainment, it serves a need in the human experience.
Kind of incredible how much publicity this game is getting because of those tits.